Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
sjm autoprod
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-22-2013, 04:08 PM   #1
11syn3rgy
JT Synergy RS/2SS
 
11syn3rgy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
Maggie dyno guesstimates (L99)

I'm headed out to the dyno tomorrow afternoon to get everything checked for Jannetty and I wanted to hear what you guys think I should be running for HP numbers? As the title says, I have the L99 and the Magnacharger TVS 2300. I am only running the stock 3.8 pulley and stock air box for the time being. I do have 1 7/8 LT headers, high-flow cats, Borla axle-back S-type and a SCT from the magician, Jannetty.

What should I be running?

For what it's worth, it is a Mustang dyno. I know these dynos typically produce less HP than their Dynojet counterpart.
11syn3rgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 04:15 PM   #2
11syn3rgy
JT Synergy RS/2SS
 
11syn3rgy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
I should add that I also have the LS9 injectors and ZR1 spark plugs as well
11syn3rgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 05:36 PM   #3
Unavowed
 
Drives: Car
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Yes
Posts: 195
499.98
Unavowed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 05:50 PM   #4
11syn3rgy
JT Synergy RS/2SS
 
11syn3rgy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unavowed View Post
499.98
I hope you're right, but I'm thinking it will be much less on the Mustang dyno? I guess we'll see...
11syn3rgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 06:20 PM   #5
bmbbl be

 
bmbbl be's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 CAMARO SS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: tallmadge, ohio
Posts: 1,293
450
bmbbl be is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 06:23 PM   #6
11syn3rgy
JT Synergy RS/2SS
 
11syn3rgy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
That's what I'm thinking, just wasn't sure how close I'd be?
11syn3rgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 06:30 PM   #7
bmbbl be

 
bmbbl be's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 CAMARO SS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: tallmadge, ohio
Posts: 1,293
CAI and a 3.6 pulley would make a nice improvement....
bmbbl be is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 06:32 PM   #8
11syn3rgy
JT Synergy RS/2SS
 
11syn3rgy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmbbl be View Post
CAI and a 3.6 pulley would make a nice improvement....
Yup. They're next on the list. Along with an MSD voltage booster. Trying to take baby steps. It's so damn difficult though.
11syn3rgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 06:38 PM   #9
bmbbl be

 
bmbbl be's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 CAMARO SS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: tallmadge, ohio
Posts: 1,293
here is my set-up

L99
Maggie 3.6 pulley
ZL1 fuel pump
livernois 2C cam
livernois ported heads
long tube headers and HF cats
roto-fab cai
DDS aluminum drive shaft

tuned by livernois

I made 586 to the rear with 22's on the car !
Attached Images
 
bmbbl be is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 06:47 PM   #10
11syn3rgy
JT Synergy RS/2SS
 
11syn3rgy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
Very nice!! Looks sweet. Unfortunately, I do not see a cam or ported heads in my future, but thanks for the post.
11syn3rgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 07:10 PM   #11
pdiddy

 
Drives: 2011 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 885
good luck tomorrow hope everything goes well, I was def surprised with my numbers they where about 30 more than I expected hope u r surprised as well and yes i have read that the mustang Dynos do read lower as well
__________________
2011 2SS,fti th400, ECS 1500, Flex Fuel, Boost built 376, squash fuel system
pdiddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 07:21 PM   #12
bct10985

 
Drives: 2010 2SS LS3, 06 F-150
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dover, De
Posts: 962
On a mustang mine made 525 on a dynojet made 577
__________________
ECS Novi 1500 supercharger, FSP cam, Tsp 2" longtubes, ZL1 fuel pump, Adm fpcm, Id850s, Aem meth, Mcleod rxt, ZL1 3.73 diff, BMR suspension, 17" weld rts, 4.5" M&H skinnies, 305 MT ET street R. 650rwhp mustang dyno. 10.93@125 1.6 60'-before cam. 4L80 swap in progress
bct10985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 07:46 PM   #13
11syn3rgy
JT Synergy RS/2SS
 
11syn3rgy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdiddy View Post
good luck tomorrow hope everything goes well, I was def surprised with my numbers they where about 30 more than I expected hope u r surprised as well and yes i have read that the mustang Dynos do read lower as well
Thanks Phil! We'll see how she does?
11syn3rgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 07:50 PM   #14
11syn3rgy
JT Synergy RS/2SS
 
11syn3rgy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by bct10985 View Post
On a mustang mine made 525 on a dynojet made 577
Yeah, I've read that the Mustang dyno numbers are typically 10-12% lower, which is exactly what you're saying. Even the owner of the shop said that guys are always disappointed with their results on this dyno, but he likes it because its much more "real world". It's an impressive system. You can see how it's able to simulate real driving conditions. It can put an amazing amount of pressure/resistance on the rear wheels. I'll be happy with 440-450 on this dyno. We'll see....
11syn3rgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 10:36 PM   #15
BowenSS1
 
BowenSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: She totaled it!
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: houston tx
Posts: 231
489rwhp 496rwtq
BowenSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 10:46 PM   #16
11syn3rgy
JT Synergy RS/2SS
 
11syn3rgy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowenSS1 View Post
489rwhp 496rwtq
I would be one happy camper with those numbers!!
11syn3rgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2013, 02:55 AM   #17
lincoln361

 
lincoln361's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: corpus christi tx
Posts: 907
When i did my dyno on the dynojet. I was at 449rwhp. I have lg headers, slp1, 3.8 pulley, no cats (straight pipe), factory cai and had 22's wheels when i did my dyno. I honestly was not pleased with it, so i ordered the 3.6 pulley and lingenfelter cai. Now i just got to get it retuned.Good luck tomorrow
__________________
SLP TVS 2300- 1 7/8 LG Headers- RDS NX Plate- 75 Shot- No Cats- SLP Loudmouth 2- VMAX Throttle Body- 3.6 Pulley-ZL1 Fuel Pump- MSD BAP- RotoFab CAI- Apex CAI Scoop- Pat G Tune- Nitto 555R 275/40/20- BMR Trailing Arms- BMR 1'' Drop Springs- BMR Toe Rods- BMR Rear Cradle Bushings- BMR Upper Control Arm Bushings- BMR Extreme Anti- Rollbar- Hotchkis Subframe Brace- Prosport Evo Boost & F/A Ratio
lincoln361 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.