Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions

5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions General 5th generation Camaro topics not covered by other subforums.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2006, 01:50 AM   #26
Seanskny
 
Drives: 2011 2SS RS delivered 6-22-10
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi
Posts: 34
I am 32 y/o. I grew up in Corvette's, Trans Am's and Camaro's. My first car was a Camaro, and my last car will be a Camaro if my walker will fit in the trunk. If it doesn't fit, I will crawl around on my arthritic knees to get in and out of it. The Camaro isn't just a car, it's an American passion/past-time like baseball. For those who are posting "I won't buy if..." Then don't! A production car has not been unveiled yet so stop the crying and whining. The Zo6 w/ the IRS does pretty damn good in the 1/4 (11.7@ 125.2 MotorTrend Dec 06). For those crying about the IRS, please take that into consideration. Chevy is going to go with IRS and they apparently have it down a hell of a lot better than ford did a few years ago. I remember a few years ago watching motortrend on speed channel testing the 4th gen camaro, and the big complaint was handling. With the IRS, maybe we all can have a rocket w/ the handling to kill the riceburners. We can all dream and hope for the best.
Seanskny is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 12:36 PM   #27
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: THRSS #2 / CGM#1
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,247
I know you talking in general and not to anyone specifically, but the ONLY reason I ever stated I wouldn't buy it, was if it was priced too high. Then it would be out of my price range. Other than that, this will be my 4th Camaro for sure!
__________________
The build of THRSS #2
TAG UR IT is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 12:59 AM   #28
Rockhead
Hoser.
 
Rockhead's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS/RS LS3 Black
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Greatest Country in the world.
Posts: 945
I guess he didn't buy one.
__________________
Speed is a substitute for clearance.
Rockhead is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 01:20 AM   #29
AlSuwaidi


 
AlSuwaidi's Avatar
 
Drives: BLACK LS3 GCC-Spec
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UAE - SHARJAH
Posts: 2,878
how did you find this thread to revive it! its sooo old!
AlSuwaidi is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 01:36 AM   #30
two_wheel_mayhem
Would rather be riding
 
two_wheel_mayhem's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,723
They did screw the pooch with the IRS for the straight line guys. I remember when Ford tried it with their Mustang Cobra, and same deal..nothing but trouble when trying to get it to holeshot well.

I like the IRS, but I dont care to drag race or worry about hard launches.

IRS sucks for drag racing, say what you will it can be made better or whatever.

Not worth the trouble if all you want is a straight line car.
two_wheel_mayhem is online now  
Old 05-18-2010, 01:36 AM   #31
zebra
just can't seem to leave
 
zebra's Avatar
 
Drives: your mom wild!!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: cold & windy
Posts: 11,576
man, y'all're gettin bored! this is the umpteenth super-necro i've seen in 5 minutes!!
__________________
zebra is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 08:32 AM   #32
superdave99
 
superdave99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS CGM L99
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 145
Where were you in 2006?!
__________________
2G1FJ1EJ8A9173456
1SS CGM w/ Black Stripes L99
3/14/10
superdave99 is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 09:11 AM   #33
Berean


 
Drives: Truck
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 2,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by 302 Wild Mouse View Post

When I "ordered" my 69. It was was one of a few that had "deleted" options. I ordered the car with the "front air dam" deleted and the "rear spoiler" deleted. Ordered 410 gears, Vinyl Roof, upgraded interior, delete guages. I never seen another one like it.

If GM is planning on only building 100,000 of these they better make it so we can order one that is as special now, as it was then.


The OP has a point here. I'd love to see GM go back to the old days when you could actually order what you want.

I would have ordered an LS with a 6.2 if that were an option.
Berean is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 09:22 AM   #34
RSHugger
 
Drives: 1969 RS Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albany OR
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berean View Post
The OP has a point here. I'd love to see GM go back to the old days when you could actually order what you want.

I would have ordered an LS with a 6.2 if that were an option.
Keep in mind that times have changed... they have changed A LOT. It costs money for a manufacturer to offer multiple options for a car. The Camaro is successful right now for the options it offers... and GM is reaping that benefit. As FBodfather states you can't make everyone happy all of the time... and then those who aren't initially happy they will typically warm up to the idea later. The Camaro can be personalized any way you want it once you get it into your garage. Please don't try to burden GM with trying to make everyone happy... they are doing a great job making a lot of people happy.
RSHugger is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 09:28 AM   #35
AdnanHfuda

 
AdnanHfuda's Avatar
 
Drives: none :(
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,128
THE THREAD IS DEAD PEOPLE!!! let it rest in peace
__________________
AdnanHfuda is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 09:30 AM   #36
ZED SLED
a.k.a. mclark10
 
ZED SLED's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 CRT ZL1 Vert M6, 2011 Equinox
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cortland, NY
Posts: 4,338

Must have been one hell of a search to dig one up almost 4 years old.
__________________
Under hood airbrush by JT's Custom Paint Garage
Moroso CC, CAI Inc intake


(Click above image to learn about UpstateC5)
ZED SLED is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 09:32 AM   #37
Berean


 
Drives: Truck
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 2,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by RSHugger View Post
Keep in mind that times have changed... they have changed A LOT. It costs money for a manufacturer to offer multiple options for a car. The Camaro is successful right now for the options it offers... and GM is reaping that benefit. As FBodfather states you can't make everyone happy all of the time... and then those who aren't initially happy they will typically warm up to the idea later. The Camaro can be personalized any way you want it once you get it into your garage. Please don't try to burden GM with trying to make everyone happy... they are doing a great job making a lot of people happy.

Well sure you can make everyone happy. Let them order what they want. GM can get away with selling option "packages" because buying a car is a singular event that doesn't happen that often and customers are willing to buy stuff they don't really want or do without, which is exactly why GM operates that way.

If most business used this model, they'd quickly go out of business with the attitude "we can't make everyone happy".

McDonalds "Yes sir, our Big Mac option package comes with pickles, mustard and fries."

Customer "I don't want fries"

McDonalds "No problem sir. We have a plain Big Mac basic option"

Customer "I don't want a plain Big Mac. I want pickles and ketchup"

McDonald "No problem sir. We have our fully loaded 2LT Mac. It has everything you want but it does include fries."

Customer "I just want a Big Mac with pickles and ketchup."

McDonalds "I'm sorry sir, what you're asking for is something only 2% of our customers would buy and it would be too expensive for us to make a Big Mac that way"

Customer "Never mind"

McDonalds "I'm sorry sir but you can't expect us to make every customer happy."
Berean is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 09:54 AM   #38
esperman
You Can Call Me Jay
 
esperman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1LT RJT Manual w/CAI & Solo
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisville, KY area
Posts: 1,247
um...yeah....
esperman is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:07 AM   #39
wylde1
I am the Stig
 
wylde1's Avatar
 
Drives: Black w/ IOM stripe 1SS
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saskatoon, SK, CAN
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berean View Post
Well sure you can make everyone happy. Let them order what they want. GM can get away with selling option "packages" because buying a car is a singular event that doesn't happen that often and customers are willing to buy stuff they don't really want or do without, which is exactly why GM operates that way.

If most business used this model, they'd quickly go out of business with the attitude "we can't make everyone happy".

McDonalds "Yes sir, our Big Mac option package comes with pickles, mustard and fries."

Customer "I don't want fries"

McDonalds "No problem sir. We have a plain Big Mac basic option"

Customer "I don't want a plain Big Mac. I want pickles and ketchup"

McDonald "No problem sir. We have our fully loaded 2LT Mac. It has everything you want but it does include fries."

Customer "I just want a Big Mac with pickles and ketchup."

McDonalds "I'm sorry sir, what you're asking for is something only 2% of our customers would buy and it would be too expensive for us to make a Big Mac that way"

Customer "Never mind"

McDonalds "I'm sorry sir but you can't expect us to make every customer happy."

I see the point your trying to make there... but we're not talking about a $3 big mac here. and there is no design work to remove fries from the package or extra tooling involved.

to re-engineer and stock all the parts to have something like a solid rear axle option.... your talking tens of millions of dollars alone. then factor in the extra space in a shop it takes to store these parts, how much longer it will take to build each car if they had so many options "the way you like it". now your talking HUNDREDS of millions. which would be spread out over the range to re-coup those costs making everyones cars more expensive. It's a MUCH better business decision to build a car that makes MOST people happy, and let the ones who aren't happy spend their own money to make it what they want. You can't have a custom car from an assembly line, that company would be out of business in a heartbeat.


gotta love zombie threads!
__________________
2010 Camaro - 1SS, Black w/ Orange stripes
wylde1 is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:12 AM   #40
tangorover
 
tangorover's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro 2LT Summit White
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 469
Holy crap I didnt realize this thread was from 3 years ago :-)
tangorover is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:15 AM   #41
AdnanHfuda

 
AdnanHfuda's Avatar
 
Drives: none :(
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangorover View Post
Holy crap I didnt realize this thread was from 3 years ago :-)
4 dude
__________________
AdnanHfuda is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:16 AM   #42
Doc
Dances With Mustangs
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS MT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 3,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by wylde1 View Post
I see the point your trying to make there... but we're not talking about a $3 big mac here. and there is no design work to remove fries from the package or extra tooling involved.

to re-engineer and stock all the parts to have something like a solid rear axle option.... your talking tens of millions of dollars alone. then factor in the extra space in a shop it takes to store these parts, how much longer it will take to build each car if they had so many options "the way you like it". now your talking HUNDREDS of millions. which would be spread out over the range to re-coup those costs making everyones cars more expensive. It's a MUCH better business decision to build a car that makes MOST people happy, and let the ones who aren't happy spend their own money to make it what they want. You can't have a custom car from an assembly line, that company would be out of business in a heartbeat.


gotta love zombie threads!
Don't forget the crash and safety tests that have to be run! Not cheap.

In the "old days" they didn't have very costly emissions tests/certifications to pass, crash safety tests to pass, nor had they just filed bankruptcy. There was also ZERO competition from foreign manufacturers.

They can't do things the old way because the old days are gone.
__________________

Blue Angel is here!!
1SS/RS LS3 M6 IBM
Doc is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:29 AM   #43
Scrappy Doo


 
Scrappy Doo's Avatar
 
Drives: Taylor Made SLDR
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: W8n 4 Snow, Minnesota
Posts: 4,647
Good Lord.

Thanks everybody.

I thought i spent a lot of time on here.

A 4 year old thread.........

WTF
Scrappy Doo is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:32 AM   #44
Berean


 
Drives: Truck
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 2,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by wylde1 View Post
I see the point your trying to make there... but we're not talking about a $3 big mac here. and there is no design work to remove fries from the package or extra tooling involved.

to re-engineer and stock all the parts to have something like a solid rear axle option.... your talking tens of millions of dollars alone. then factor in the extra space in a shop it takes to store these parts, how much longer it will take to build each car if they had so many options "the way you like it". now your talking HUNDREDS of millions. which would be spread out over the range to re-coup those costs making everyones cars more expensive. It's a MUCH better business decision to build a car that makes MOST people happy, and let the ones who aren't happy spend their own money to make it what they want. You can't have a custom car from an assembly line, that company would be out of business in a heartbeat.


gotta love zombie threads!

I don't disagree with that assessment but my point wasn't toward the live rear axle but toward the "options" within what they are already offering on Camaro's, i.e. I want an LS with a 6.2 engine. (In other words a 1SS with "delete options". That requires nothing more than some special oversight on the assembly line, sort of like the old COPO Camaro's. If that costs a little extra on an individual basis and customers are willing to pay for it, why would GM say "Sorry, we can't make everyone happy."

Maybe I want a leather steering wheel without the C&C package etc. Why can't they do that for a price? They can. They just don't want to.


And yes, +1 for zombie threads.
Berean is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 12:14 PM   #45
RSHugger
 
Drives: 1969 RS Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albany OR
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berean View Post
I don't disagree with that assessment but my point wasn't toward the live rear axle but toward the "options" within what they are already offering on Camaro's, i.e. I want an LS with a 6.2 engine. (In other words a 1SS with "delete options". That requires nothing more than some special oversight on the assembly line, sort of like the old COPO Camaro's. If that costs a little extra on an individual basis and customers are willing to pay for it, why would GM say "Sorry, we can't make everyone happy."

Maybe I want a leather steering wheel without the C&C package etc. Why can't they do that for a price? They can. They just don't want to.


And yes, +1 for zombie threads.
I am not disagreeing with the idea... just not sure you realize the additional effort associated with that. GM had to restructure to simplify their business... to streamline and make it more efficient. Oldsmobile, Saturn, Pontiac, Hummer... too much overhead and costs. The more efficient you make any process the more money you can put in your pocket for profit and future endeavors... add to that process and you can impact both.
RSHugger is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 12:17 PM   #46
Doc
Dances With Mustangs
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS MT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 3,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berean View Post
I don't disagree with that assessment but my point wasn't toward the live rear axle but toward the "options" within what they are already offering on Camaro's, i.e. I want an LS with a 6.2 engine. (In other words a 1SS with "delete options". That requires nothing more than some special oversight on the assembly line, sort of like the old COPO Camaro's. If that costs a little extra on an individual basis and customers are willing to pay for it, why would GM say "Sorry, we can't make everyone happy."

Maybe I want a leather steering wheel without the C&C package etc. Why can't they do that for a price? They can. They just don't want to.


And yes, +1 for zombie threads.
Dude; read my post above. They CAN'T do things like "they used to" because the times have changed as to what and how things are required to be done BY LAW. They're struggling back from a bankruptcy.

It's now up to 3rd parties to do the kind of customization you want because the manufacturers simply can't afford all the costs of complying with the regulation certifications requirements for every variation you think you want. Putting a different motor in it requires crash and safety testing and emissions certifications for that motor in that car and all that is bloody expensive!! THEY WENT BANKRUPT!!! They HAVE to be more conservative now; that's just the way it is. Be thankful (I know I sure am) that they were able to even build the Camaro we have at all!

You want a different steering wheel? Customize it yourself; to a lot of people that's half the fun of owning cars like this. Being able to customize it so it's "your car" is a great American tradition and in that regard, at least doing that is still a lot like "the old days". The manufacturers can't do things like they used to not because they don't want to but because the laws and requlations don't allow it anymore.
__________________

Blue Angel is here!!
1SS/RS LS3 M6 IBM
Doc is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 12:25 PM   #47
Edrock

 
Edrock's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro 2SS LS3
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jamestown, NC
Posts: 964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berean View Post
Well sure you can make everyone happy. Let them order what they want. GM can get away with selling option "packages" because buying a car is a singular event that doesn't happen that often and customers are willing to buy stuff they don't really want or do without, which is exactly why GM operates that way.

If most business used this model, they'd quickly go out of business with the attitude "we can't make everyone happy".

McDonalds "Yes sir, our Big Mac option package comes with pickles, mustard and fries."

Customer "I don't want fries"

McDonalds "No problem sir. We have a plain Big Mac basic option"

Customer "I don't want a plain Big Mac. I want pickles and ketchup"

McDonald "No problem sir. We have our fully loaded 2LT Mac. It has everything you want but it does include fries."

Customer "I just want a Big Mac with pickles and ketchup."

McDonalds "I'm sorry sir, what you're asking for is something only 2% of our customers would buy and it would be too expensive for us to make a Big Mac that way"

Customer "Never mind"

McDonalds "I'm sorry sir but you can't expect us to make every customer happy."

Dude...this is absolutely not an apples to apples comparison. Comparing the assembly of a hamburger to what goes on in the automotive industry? C'mon.....FAIL.
__________________
DT Shorties, Solo hi-flow Cats, X-pipe, resonator delete, Flowmaster Super-44s, VMAX TB, Stronger MAF, C.A.I. Intake with race scoop, and JRE Tune!
WOT is my happy place!!
Edrock is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 12:43 PM   #48
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrappy Doo View Post
Good Lord.

Thanks everybody.

I thought i spent a lot of time on here.

A 4 year old thread.........

WTF
Holly crap! You got me there!!! It looks like the OP's two posts really paid off...
radz28 is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 12:50 PM   #49
Berean


 
Drives: Truck
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 2,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edrock View Post
Dude...this is absolutely not an apples to apples comparison. Comparing the assembly of a hamburger to what goes on in the automotive industry? C'mon.....FAIL.

Read it a couple more times, you might get my point.
Berean is offline  
Old 05-18-2010, 12:54 PM   #50
HOZAY
The Eponymous Jose
 
HOZAY's Avatar
 
Drives: A V6. Yes. A LLT.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Miami
Posts: 403
When this thread "ended" for the first time, I was a junior @ UM. Probably working on my final project. My gawd, it's been 3 1/2 years, lol
__________________
HOZAY is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 12 03-15-2009 04:38 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.