Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Rick@Livernois
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-04-2013, 07:24 AM   #1
PhoenixZL1
Banned
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: MD
Posts: 299
Accessory Splash Guards, cool or not?

Just curious what the opinion is on the factory Accessory splash guards are here. Cool because they give the car a little bit of ground effect look, or bad because they make the Camaro look like a 4x4 or just any other typical car? I'm on the fence about them just wondering what the consensus is about them.
PhoenixZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 07:52 AM   #2
Denis


 
Denis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yorktown Heights, NY
Posts: 7,706
yea, ive neve been a fan. i got the rear splash guards off the ZL1 because i didnt like the other options. the ZL1 guards are hardly noticable.
__________________
Denis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 07:55 AM   #3
Steve RS/SS
 
Steve RS/SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 296
I think they are more functional than cool. I also think they really dont look bad but I made the decision to install them after i read about all the people saying they got peppered with rock chips and I noticed a couple of little chips on my own car and that was it. It's been over three years and I have no chips except the ones I had before I installed the splash guards. I recommend them if you want to minimze the damge...Just my opinion
__________________
Steve RS/SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 08:59 AM   #4
Chevyman2
 
Chevyman2's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 C7(awaiting delivery)
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 386
Get them they are well worth the time and money. Looks good but this is based on ones own preference it's subjective.
Chevyman2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 09:06 AM   #5
camaro_RS
Emerald Coast Camaros
 
camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Drives: A lot of show, not much go.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Emerald Coast
Posts: 3,390
I say get them if you're not getting ground effects otherwise. They can help prevent paint chips from what I assume.
__________________
-White Mary Jane....build thread [COTW 6/11/12] :

camaro_RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 09:20 AM   #6
Cincy10SSRS

 
Cincy10SSRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS RS M6
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cincinnati area
Posts: 1,524
I had them on my IBM 2LT/RS and thought they looked very good and certainly helped with the road spray/rock chip aspect. Like an earlier poster said, if you aren't going GFX, definitely get them.
__________________
Traded-in car: K&N Typhoon intake, JBA Shorty headers, Solo mid-pipes/hi-flow cats, GMPP Track Pack axle-back, Vmax ported TB, Billet Custom catch can, billet tensioner pulley, Hines Hex Vents, Z/TA rear spoiler, ProCustom headlight covers, Drake black/riveted quarter window covers, GM satin fuel door, chrome and brushed caps/covers under the hood, EmblemPros underhood bowtie & fuel rail "Camaro" plates, chrome "SS" door kick-panels, chrome trunk latch plate & strut rods, Street Scene lower grille ducts w/LED lights, front bowtie-delete, Yates Performance pedals, 35% tint, etc.
Cincy10SSRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 09:56 AM   #7
RubyCamaro
Jan
 
RubyCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT Red Jewel tintcoat
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Springfield, TN
Posts: 15,367
That was Ruby's first mod. She already had a few paint chips in her gill area before they were installed. I have never been sorry. No chips in that area since. My car is no garage queen. I drive her so this was a good investment for me. I think they look good too. As a PS I prefer to be behind someone in Camarovans, who also has the quarter flares. They don't throw as many rocks at me!

__________________
RubyCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 10:00 AM   #8
upflying


 
upflying's Avatar
 
Drives: '86 Monte Carlo SS
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,119
Mud flaps belong on trucks.
upflying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 10:02 AM   #9
GoEagles88
 
GoEagles88's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2LT RS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 31
Send a message via AIM to GoEagles88
Sorry, don't like them. You asked for opinions. It makes the car look dated. If you're worried about rock dings, get them...but it sounds like you're more concerned about if they'll look good.
__________________
2012 RS 2LT Convertible in Inferno Orange
It's my wife's car. I just get to keep it clean.
GoEagles88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 10:11 AM   #10
45thCamaro


 
45thCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 45th Anniversary RS
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 2,319
I like them on mine, glad I purchased them. Helps keep the car clean. I don't understand why so many people don't like them.
45thCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 10:11 AM   #11
AKA-22

 
AKA-22's Avatar
 
Drives: ELLE-1
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Farmington ,mo
Posts: 1,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by upflying View Post
Mud flaps belong on trucks.
yeah it looks cool for rocks to actually change the color of my black Camaro to a white .....thats why they r called quarterflares instead of mud flaps, if i had a truck that's what i would call them but i dont... i have a camaro and if i didnt have the quarterflares my paint would be destroyed in certain areas....
__________________
AKA-22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 10:12 AM   #12
mcdoogle6969

 
mcdoogle6969's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,912
Ugly.
__________________
mcdoogle6969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 10:21 AM   #13
edgehead2000
2016 Camaro 1LT 2.0T
 
edgehead2000's Avatar
 
Drives: Nemesis
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 830
I like them. So what if they make the car look dated? It's that nostalgic look that some of us are shooting for anyway. I'd rather have an older/dated looking car than the newer looking 2014!

edgehead2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 10:22 AM   #14
ckaram

 
ckaram's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS RS, 1968 ragtop
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,850
Do a search. You'll see plenty of threads on the debate. For me, my SS is a year-rounder so I have them. I happen to think they also look cool.

Kinda like paint dripping off a canvas. I dig it. The above pic displays it nicely.
__________________
1968 Camaro convertible, LS1 & T56, Texas Speed 228R cam, 3.73 posi, 17" Torque Thrusts
2011 2SS/RS, LS3, M6, IOM in and out, factory Hurst short throw, GMPP axleback exhaust SOLD! Now in a 2016 Challenger Scat Pack Shaker, M6
ckaram is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.