Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
HeadlightArmor
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics > Engine | Exhaust | Bolt-On | Drivetrain Modifications

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-18-2013, 09:46 AM   #1
kmthor00
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Black
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Frankfort, Illinois
Posts: 248
Roto-Fab filter, oiled or dry & why?

Looking at this CAI, certain website asks if choosing oiled or dry filter (dry is a $16 upgrade). Which filter & why? Thanks
kmthor00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 11:49 AM   #2
DangerZL1

 
Drives: Accord
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Memphis, TN Area
Posts: 1,910
I think it comes down to personal preference and whether or not you want to mess with washing, drying, and oiling a K&N type filter or just cleaning and drying a dry filter. There is also a concern over oil accumulation in the Mass Air, but haven't seen any reported incidences of this on the ZL1. It's also easy to over oil a K&N type filter.

I don't think K&N filters trap as much dirt as they claim vs a dry filter. You may have seen the display where a k&N filter and a dry filter are in a box with a fan a ping pong ball and the ping pong ball is lifted by the fan on the k&N side, while it is stationary on the paper filter side. If you look closely at the cotton gauze in the K&N filter, you'll notice tiny holes in the gauze. K&N claims the oil on the filter traps the contaminants, but I think a lot of them get through and show up a s higher silica content when an oil analysis is performed.
DangerZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 11:59 AM   #3
ModBargains.com


 
ModBargains.com's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro, 996TT, 335i, Etc.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 1721 E. Lambert Rd. Unit C, La Habra, Ca 90631
Posts: 2,153
Oiled filters, because they're oiled, can run with less filter material, which means better airflow. This of course leads to a bit more efficiency, and more power (though really negligible compared to the dry). Oiled filters require maintenance when it comes to cleaning, ie: washing, letting dry, then re-oiling.

Dry filters are thick paper filters typically and though they block out debris more than oiled filters typically do, because they're thicker, they're less efficient, which results in a bit less power. What they really are good for is less maintenance. Cleaning just involves removing from the car, and I typically take a paint brush to it and get all the dirt out of it. I never take high pressured air to it, this can lead to punctures in the filter material which of course leads to very bad news.

Personally I'd still go with oiled filters, I don't mind the extra maintenance.
__________________

Jurrian Terpstra | Modification Expert | Jurrian@ModBargains.com | (714) 582-3330 ext. 8002
We Specialize In: Camaro Wheels | Camaro Suspension | Camaro Performance | KW Coilovers |
Hours: Mon - Fri 8:00am-6:00pm | Sat 8:00am-5:00pm (PST)
ModBargains.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 05:59 PM   #4
JDP Tyler
 
JDP Tyler's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 6,980
Dry filters will not quite flow as well as oiled filters and will continually flow less and less efficiently throughout their life span. I prefer and recommend the oiled filter. Please feel free to call, PM or email me anytime with questions.

Best regards,

Tyler
888-308-6007
JDP Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 06:25 PM   #5
turboguy327
 
Drives: 2011 Chevy Camaro
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 666
I personally prefer dry filters. They filter better. Who cares about an extra 1-2 hp when it comes to filtering. I'd rather have a better filter. Just have to clean it once a month. Takes about 2 minutes.
turboguy327 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 10:45 AM   #6
BlackinBlack
 
BlackinBlack's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1 Black
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 712
When I bought my Roto-fab for my SS back in '09 I bought directly from Roto-fab. I bought with a dry filter. They said for stock NA applications the difference was minor but with FI motors the added restriction would reduce HP gains significantly.

On a ZL1 I would use the oiled filter.

Edit: I owned both filter types from Roto-fab.

Stock SS = dry filter not much difference. Less maintance

ZL1 = oiled filter due to being supercharged.
__________________
2013 ZL1 BLACK on BLACK
Roto-Fab CAI

2010 2SS/RS BLACK on BLACK <SOLD>
3" MBRP 304 Stainless Exhaust
Roto-Fab CAI
BlackinBlack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 07:40 AM   #7
h018871
 
h018871's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 2SS 1LE BlueRay Met
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 337
i sent a note to Rotofab asking for their take on oiled versus dry and got this reply:

The dry filter is preferred by those concerned about the possibility of contaminating their MAF sensor with oil. The dry filter has slightly better filtration also and is a better choice if you do a lot of driving on dusty roads. The oil version is our standard filter. It makes a little more power than the dry version. Either filter should last for the life of your car. Periodic cleaning is required.
Thanks,
Jennifer
Roto-fab LLC
260-375-4480

boils down to personal choice
h018871 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.