Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
River City Camaro Customs
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-28-2013, 07:09 PM   #1
partymn

 
partymn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1ss 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 873
1 PSI boost to 3.5 PSI back pressure???

So my car is having some issues with post turbo back pressure as it climbs higher in the boost. My tuner is saying that my down pipe and possibly the turbo are to small for my LS3, 67/67 turbo and 3 inch down pipe with 2 1/2 inch pipes all the way back with no cats. I really wish that I would have realized this when I first installed the turbo but I was so excited to finally get it that I over looked this detail. On the bright side its nice to have my car in the hands of a shop that knows what they are doing. The initial shop that tuned the car missed this.

So maybe its time for us all to get better educated on this topic. Any of our experts want to throw out some information on this?
Am I heading down the same road as GbrilliantQ with bent rods and blown out engine blocks?
__________________
2014 1SS 1LE, bone stock for now.

Last edited by partymn; 06-28-2013 at 07:54 PM.
partymn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 07:31 PM   #2
GbrilliantQ
¡ʇuɐıןןıɹq
 
GbrilliantQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro IOM 2SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Decatur, Illinois
Posts: 2,598
Hmmmm.... I've been without my car for almost 8 months now. I better not have this problem.

From my Note
__________________
GbrilliantQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 07:43 PM   #3
partymn

 
partymn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1ss 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 873
Its hard to say if you will or not, I sure hope not.
__________________
2014 1SS 1LE, bone stock for now.
partymn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 07:47 PM   #4
killmode_on
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 131
Holy crap, that's really not good.
You have a single 67/67 with a single 2.5" down pipe? That is totally unacceptable. A single 2.5" pipe is good for less than stock HP.
__________________
Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm hunting GT500's.
killmode_on is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 07:53 PM   #5
partymn

 
partymn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1ss 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 873
Sorry for the mistake but the down pipe is 3 inches and the merge pipe is 2 1/2 inches, I will change the original post. However, its still not good.
__________________
2014 1SS 1LE, bone stock for now.
partymn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 08:17 PM   #6
JLE58

 
Drives: CGM,twin turbo, cam 2010 SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ROCKMART, GA
Posts: 2,189
The turbo would be fine for 7-8 psi. Anything more than that is to much. I've said it more times than I can count a 67mm turbine wheel is to small for a ls3. That kit was never supposed to have a 67mm turbo of course it also wasn't supposed to be crammed between the motor and radiator either. Either way I wouldnt think backpressure would be a big problem at your boost level.
JLE58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 08:30 PM   #7
partymn

 
partymn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1ss 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 873
Its 29 PSI at 8.13 PSI of boost. Everything that I have read says this is not a good thing.
__________________
2014 1SS 1LE, bone stock for now.
partymn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 09:10 PM   #8
JLE58

 
Drives: CGM,twin turbo, cam 2010 SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ROCKMART, GA
Posts: 2,189
I wouldn't think it would be that high. All of the turbonetics kits have a 67mm turbine turbo I believe. I'd see what some of those guys are doing to keep backpressure down. I'm sure most of them have never tested it. A larger down pipe would be the first step. That turbo does have a t4 .96 ar exhaust housing correct? You don't have much room for a larger turbo....
JLE58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 09:29 PM   #9
partymn

 
partymn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1ss 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 873
Yes it does and no I don't have much room left. I think SSDIAZ is running a 72mm but I am not sure. All I know is that the back pressure is high as hell and it is limiting me to 546 HP and 600 on torque at 8.13 PSI.
__________________
2014 1SS 1LE, bone stock for now.
partymn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 09:35 PM   #10
partymn

 
partymn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1ss 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 873
Are there other ways to help this problem that don't require me to have a down pipe made and a new tune after that.
__________________
2014 1SS 1LE, bone stock for now.
partymn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 11:57 PM   #11
killmode_on
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 131
You need a bigger turbine wheel #1.
And a bigger down pipe or at least expansion chamber right out of the turbo #2.

Single on a 6.2L motor should be a minimum of a 75mm turbine wheel if you want everything to work HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY.
__________________
Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm hunting GT500's.
killmode_on is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 07:59 AM   #12
dekan513
chevy pride
 
dekan513's Avatar
 
Drives: 2ss/rs
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: pikeville ky
Posts: 2,139
killmode , hit it on the head. im not a turbo man but . he thinking just as i am.
__________________

check out ky speeds fb page https://www.facebook.com/kyspeed
dekan513 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 08:57 AM   #13
JLE58

 
Drives: CGM,twin turbo, cam 2010 SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ROCKMART, GA
Posts: 2,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by partymn View Post
Yes it does and no I don't have much room left. I think SSDIAZ is running a 72mm but I am not sure. All I know is that the back pressure is high as hell and it is limiting me to 546 HP and 600 on torque at 8.13 PSI.
Your not going to make much more than that even with a bigger down pipe on that turbo. If it was mine I would move the turbo over to the driver side bring it up and point it towards the head light. Build a bigger cross over and down pipe and put a bigger turbo on it... That would be the way to make it right would also help with the drain issues. What turbo is on it Comp? I'm not sure how Diaz got the turbonetics turbo but my guess would be Chris pulled it off another car and charged Diaz full price for it. Either way I would bet money he never bought that turbo new from turbonetics.

Last edited by JLE58; 06-29-2013 at 09:55 AM.
JLE58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 09:57 AM   #14
Unreal


 
Drives: 2006 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 4,522
Even with a bigger downpipe the turbine is too small. Sell it to a honda/evo/subaru guy and get a proper setup.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp
Unreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 11:14 AM   #15
GbrilliantQ
¡ʇuɐıןןıɹq
 
GbrilliantQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro IOM 2SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Decatur, Illinois
Posts: 2,598
You know its funny how no one mentioned or thought this turbo was to small over a year ago when Chris introduced this kit. Now everyone is saying it....

From my Note
__________________
GbrilliantQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 11:28 AM   #16
JLE58

 
Drives: CGM,twin turbo, cam 2010 SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ROCKMART, GA
Posts: 2,189
It has the same turbine wheel size as the turbonetics kit... I think even Chris said the kit was for 550 Rwhp. The kit was supposed to have 76/75 turbos originally. I'm not sure when the 67mm stuff started I still wouldn't have thought back pressure would have been that high.

Last edited by JLE58; 06-29-2013 at 11:43 AM.
JLE58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 12:49 PM   #17
partymn

 
partymn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1ss 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 873
You know I really didn't want this to turn into another HPS bash session. I think that we all agree on what type of shop it was and have had enough fun blaming them for this kit.

I would like options to correct the problem with the kit set up the way it is. I cant afford to redesign the kit right now nor can I afford to buy a larger turbo. There has got to be a cheaper way to lower the pressure that doesn't require me to change the whole design of the kit. I need to get the backpressure down to a reasonable level to keep my engine alive.

I have a set of exhaust cutouts that will be going on when I get the car back, will that help while they are open? Will it need retuned afterword? I know that it normally wouldn't but I am not sure if it will in this situation.

Could the stock cans that I still have on the car exaggerate this issue? Could they be damaged internally and cause this high pressure? If so those can go away for some flowmasters.

If I get the backpressure down to, lets say, a 1:2:1 ratio will the car need to be retuned? I probably already know the answer to that but you never know.

Could my lack of a catch can also exaggerate this issue?
__________________
2014 1SS 1LE, bone stock for now.
partymn is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.