Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Grabiak Performance Center
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2013, 09:43 PM   #18
FaytalsCamaro
Distributor of Liquor
 
FaytalsCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: My Wife Crazy
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by wally mayfield View Post
so is the ford gt the only v8 mustang?
Also have the gt350 gt500 and boss
FaytalsCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 09:44 PM   #19
Biscuitpie

 
Biscuitpie's Avatar
 
Drives: '11 Cammed LS3, '14 Scion FRS
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by wally mayfield View Post
so is the ford gt the only v8 mustang?
The Ford GT isn't a Mustang at all. As ford V8 Mustangs there are several over the years: Mach 1, GT, Cobra, GT500, GT350, Bullitt, Boss, LX, etc. Newer bodystyle you'd be looking at the GT and GT500.
__________________

SOLD with a Z06 in the not too distant future: Cammed, boltons, axles, lowered, and more. | 476 WHP
Biscuitpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 09:45 PM   #20
Biscuitpie

 
Biscuitpie's Avatar
 
Drives: '11 Cammed LS3, '14 Scion FRS
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbis View Post
What about a 4th gen ss versus v6 stock.

Or to help answer my argument with my buddy a 2013 ls v6 with a K&N 69 air intake and RX catch can with 2000 miles on it versus a stock 2001 ss 88000 miles on it.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
4th gen Camaros were a LOT faster than Mustangs of the time. Some did 12s stock or low 13s. Wouldn't be very close unless you had the turd auto without a stall or tune vs a full bolton v6 and I still doubt the V6 would win.
__________________

SOLD with a Z06 in the not too distant future: Cammed, boltons, axles, lowered, and more. | 476 WHP
Biscuitpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 09:45 PM   #21
FaytalsCamaro
Distributor of Liquor
 
FaytalsCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: My Wife Crazy
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbis View Post
What about a 4th gen ss versus v6 stock.

Or to help answer my argument with my buddy a 2013 ls v6 with a K&N 69 air intake and RX catch can with 2000 miles on it versus a stock 2001 ss 88000 miles on it.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Give it to the ss on this one. Although it may be closer with the mileage on the ss if it wasn't well taken care of
FaytalsCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 09:46 PM   #22
Biscuitpie

 
Biscuitpie's Avatar
 
Drives: '11 Cammed LS3, '14 Scion FRS
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaytalsCamaro View Post
Give it to the ss on this one. Although it may be closer with the mileage on the ss if it wasn't well taken care of
My friend has an LS1 Trans Am with 170k on it... it's in pristine shape and runs great. It's surprising what a good owner can do for a car.
__________________

SOLD with a Z06 in the not too distant future: Cammed, boltons, axles, lowered, and more. | 476 WHP
Biscuitpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 09:50 PM   #23
FaytalsCamaro
Distributor of Liquor
 
FaytalsCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: My Wife Crazy
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biscuitpie View Post
My friend has an LS1 Trans Am with 170k on it... it's in pristine shape and runs great. It's surprising what a good owner can do for a car.
Indeed
FaytalsCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 09:51 PM   #24
fielderLS3


 
fielderLS3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Mazda6, 2011 Mustang 5.0
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portage, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,981
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbis View Post
What about a 4th gen ss versus v6 stock.

Or to help answer my argument with my buddy a 2013 ls v6 with a K&N 69 air intake and RX catch can with 2000 miles on it versus a stock 2001 ss 88000 miles on it.
An LS1 4th gen vs a 5th gen V6 would be an even bigger blowout. LS1 had 340-350hp, at least 80 ft-lbs more than the V6, and was way lighter.
__________________
"Proven V-8 power with better efficiency than a turbo V-6"

"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive."eds.
fielderLS3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 10:00 PM   #25
302-412
 
Drives: 2013 Ram Express
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Seguin Texas
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by fielderLS3 View Post
An LS1 4th gen vs a 5th gen V6 would be an even bigger blowout. LS1 had 340-350hp, at least 80 ft-lbs more than the V6, and was way lighter.
Yep, haul ass cars!
302-412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 11:58 PM   #26
BlaqWhole

 
BlaqWhole's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by DroptopZ View Post
I thought those SOHC 4.6 GTs were good for about a 14.1? I seem to recall running very even with my 94 z28. The new six is a mid 14 car, no?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkneSS View Post
The auto is a mid 14 car but a 6MT is DEFINITELY a low 14 car. I pulled a 14.1 bone stock in my old LLT and consistently ran low 14s with an intake. A pro driver could pull a 13.9-14.0 out of a stock 6MT with seat time or just an intake.
A 5sp is good for a low 14...even a 13.8-13.9 at best. Again, equal driving skills and the 99-04 Mustang GT will win.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Biscuitpie View Post
The Ford GT isn't a Mustang at all. As ford V8 Mustangs there are several over the years: Mach 1, GT, Cobra, GT500, GT350, Bullitt, Boss, LX, etc. Newer bodystyle you'd be looking at the GT and GT500.
True...the "Ford GT" is actually a supercar. It costed over $140,000 and was produced from 2004-2006 with a mid engine 5.4 DOHC supercharged engine that made about 550 hp. That car was good for mid 11s bone stock.
__________________
Nadia (2010 Camaro 2SS/RS LS3) - Vararam CAI - SLP Underdrive Pulley - V-Max TB and Power Wedge - OBX 1-7/8 LTs with HF Cats - OBX 3" Cat-Back - Custom Predator Tune - BER Ported Intake Manifold!!

Esmeralda (03 GT) - UDP, CAI, PP intake manifold/upper plenum/75mm TB, 4.10s, fully rebuilt/upgraded trans w/ Transpak, 2400 stall converter, full O/R exhaust, 04 Cobra tank/dual 255 LPH pumps, Sniper Tune!!

Saving the world...1 hp at a time!!
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 12:52 AM   #27
08-G35s/6MT

 
08-G35s/6MT's Avatar
 
Drives: racecars
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,776
Lmao those 2v are all POS slow pathetic and should be stripped of any "muscle car" pretentions that ever came with it.... There were 3 last Friday with bolt ons and skinnys in front, slicks in back running 14's @ 93-97 mph ahahahah. An Accord from 10 years ago will walk one on the highway and they put less power to the ground then an accord of the same year
08-G35s/6MT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 03:12 AM   #28
BlaqWhole

 
BlaqWhole's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT View Post
Lmao those 2v are all POS slow pathetic and should be stripped of any "muscle car" pretentions that ever came with it.... There were 3 last Friday with bolt ons and skinnys in front, slicks in back running 14's @ 93-97 mph ahahahah. An Accord from 10 years ago will walk one on the highway and they put less power to the ground then an accord of the same year
You are out of your mind. If they ran that slow then it was the driver's fault. And you are simply crazy if you think an Accord will "walk" or even keep up with one on ANY road. There are bone stock 5 speed New Edge GTs that run low 13s on slicks out here in NJ. A cam and slicks will propel a 5 speed into the 12s. You seem to have a lot of false knowledge about a lot of cars man...
__________________
Nadia (2010 Camaro 2SS/RS LS3) - Vararam CAI - SLP Underdrive Pulley - V-Max TB and Power Wedge - OBX 1-7/8 LTs with HF Cats - OBX 3" Cat-Back - Custom Predator Tune - BER Ported Intake Manifold!!

Esmeralda (03 GT) - UDP, CAI, PP intake manifold/upper plenum/75mm TB, 4.10s, fully rebuilt/upgraded trans w/ Transpak, 2400 stall converter, full O/R exhaust, 04 Cobra tank/dual 255 LPH pumps, Sniper Tune!!

Saving the world...1 hp at a time!!
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 06:28 AM   #29
302-412
 
Drives: 2013 Ram Express
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Seguin Texas
Posts: 228
With an exceptional pilot a 260 hp 2v could get into the 13's. They could be pretty quick out of the hole. Here we go......... Motor trend got 14.00 @ 100mph, just besting the s/c Lightening they were testing at the time.
302-412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 06:31 AM   #30
302-412
 
Drives: 2013 Ram Express
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Seguin Texas
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT View Post
Lmao those 2v are all POS slow pathetic and should be stripped of any "muscle car" pretentions that ever came with it.... There were 3 last Friday with bolt ons and skinnys in front, slicks in back running 14's @ 93-97 mph ahahahah. An Accord from 10 years ago will walk one on the highway and they put less power to the ground then an accord of the same year
And we should give these "muscle car pretentions" to.........Accords?
302-412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 06:42 AM   #31
trademaster
 
Drives: 06 Maserati gran sport, 12 z06
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Detroit/NYC
Posts: 691
Quote:
Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT View Post
Lmao those 2v are all POS slow pathetic and should be stripped of any "muscle car" pretentions that ever came with it.... There were 3 last Friday with bolt ons and skinnys in front, slicks in back running 14's @ 93-97 mph ahahahah. An Accord from 10 years ago will walk one on the highway and they put less power to the ground then an accord of the same year


Every single time I see you post.
trademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 06:56 AM   #32
RedWingsZL1
 
Drives: 2013 AGM M6 ZL1, 2008 Tahoe LTZ
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westfield, IN
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by trademaster View Post


Every single time I see you post.
__________________
2013 ZL1
RedWingsZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 07:58 AM   #33
72MachOne99GT

 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Drives: 1972 Mach 1, 1999 GT
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,177
My '99 isnt fast by any means, but I went 13.6@100 with 4.10s a midpipe and catback on drag Radials.

Again, nothing great, but it used to feel fun *now it feels like it cant get out of its own way compared to the new car*
__________________
2013 GT500- Grabber Blue/stripe delete, Base, Recaros,
1999 GT- Atlantic Blue, gears, exhaust, tires 13.6@100
1972 Mach 1- Med Lime Green Metallic, 351-4V, auto,
Quote:
...if you want to compare performance numbers, well, the GT500 retains it's title of the highest hp, worst performing car in the world.
72MachOne99GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 09:30 PM   #34
NYYFan325
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 509
If you want a guaranteed win vs a GT mustang in your V6 you'll have to go all the way back to the pre 99 GT's which put out 225 (or 215 I forget?) HP.

Torque and weight take away any HP advantage the V6 Camaro has!
__________________
NYYFan325 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.