Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Apex Paul
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro Z/28 Forum - Z/28 Specific Topics


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2013, 11:58 AM   #35
Zfatuated

 
Zfatuated's Avatar
 
Drives: BAC Mono
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Reno
Posts: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
I will admit I did not word my post well at all. Still early need more coffee!

When I said both sides, what I should have said was this

I understand that this car is not a race car, and that people are going to be able to track it and do very well with it. It is a very track capable street car

The "other side" would be I can understand how some people may be upset/disappointed that with how track focused this car is, and how it follows the heritage of the 67-69 Z/28s that it as it sits wasnt really built to race in a specific series, but GM also stated that when the released the car. Maybe Im still not wording that right, lol. but I think it made sense as to what I should have said haha.
Let me clarify I am not personally attacking you, simply making my points with gusto and emotion

Drag and Tracking have nothing in common other than a car is used for both sports. As has been posted here ad infinitum, ad nauseum, trackers "get it" and non-trackers are trying to make arguments that make no sense

The Z/28 is a fantastic package for its intended purpose. If people will stop interpreting it as something it is not nor was ever meant to be, we can generate more pixels about its tasty goodness and lose the moronic worry over it's "legality" <face palm>

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Moreno View Post
STRAIGHT FROM THE PRESS RELEASE FROM 3/27

The car is not meant for any organized racing, and GM acknowledges that. It is a HPDE enthusiast car. "track ready" not "SCCA ready"
Thank you Sir. That is the kind of homework I can respect and relate to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by backtotintops View Post
Suits me perfect!!!

And i think Justin just flushed thepill down the proverbial crapper forever.
Zfatuated is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 12:24 PM   #36
90503


 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 11,472
Actually this thread (didn't bother reading the Pill's comments) has been pretty informative for me...The true sanctioned, legal, SCAA, whatever, etc. type of hard core racing is total pie-in-the sky for me....

"Track Events" sound more appealing and do-able anyways...lol....And if the Z/28 is made for that purpose and not out of place for the type of build that it is going to be, then all the better....just sayin'.....
90503 is online now  
Old 07-12-2013, 12:34 PM   #37
Rock36
I just like V8s
 
Rock36's Avatar
 
Drives: 2007 Corvette Z06
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 919
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90503 View Post
Actually this thread (didn't bother reading the Pill's comments) has been pretty informative for me...The true sanctioned, legal, SCAA, whatever, etc. type of hard core racing is total pie-in-the sky for me....
"Track Events" sound more appealing and do-able anyways...lol....And if the Z/28 is made for that purpose and not out of place for the type of build that it is going to be, then all the better....just sayin'.....
__________________
"Anyone know who sells the driver mods?"

2007 Corvette Z06: Le Mans blue, 2LZ

Rock36 is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 12:39 PM   #38
Zfatuated

 
Zfatuated's Avatar
 
Drives: BAC Mono
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Reno
Posts: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by backtotintops View Post
Huh? I ran a street car in SCCA T1 for many years. Kept plates on it too.
Understood. I was thinking GrandAm/ALMS because that is what the 302S/R are designed to fit within the rules of essentially out of the box. That kind of car never was street legal nor can it ever be made so. A "pure and intended" race car if you will.

OP's argument was based on a race car fitting certain rules.
Zfatuated is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 12:53 PM   #39
www.MorenoMotorsports.com
~ G5Carbon.com ~

 
www.MorenoMotorsports.com's Avatar
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
He has many valid points. Chevy is marketing this car as a track ready purpose built car, yet it is unable to compete in any meaningful sanctioned events. The other interesting info I got out of this post is that it seems that the 1LE is not even competitive with the standard 5.0 GT never mind the Boss in the sanctioned SCCA events. There are 7-mustangs ranked above the 1LE some base GTs. Do the 1LE drivers competing not know how to drive? Regardless GM should have made certain that the Z/28 would be able to compete in these events and not just lightning lap articles.
those are not "base GT's"

here is the list thepill posted...



here is the camaro from that list



and a couple SCCA mustangs





which reminds me... this guy has been saying all boss 302's come from the factory built around the rulebook. dont the street 302's come with 19" wheels? which violate the 18" max wheel diameter rule that he posted?

thePill's posts are strangely funny i'll admit... I LOL'd at his chops with the joker in them.
__________________
<img src=http://www.camaro5.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=32176&dateline=1430409495 border=0 alt= />

Last edited by www.MorenoMotorsports.com; 07-12-2013 at 01:04 PM.
www.MorenoMotorsports.com is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 12:58 PM   #40
shaffe

 
Drives: 2012 Focus
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Burr Ridge
Posts: 2,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zfatuated View Post
Let me clarify I am not personally attacking you, simply making my points with gusto and emotion

Drag and Tracking have nothing in common other than a car is used for both sports. As has been posted here ad infinitum, ad nauseum, trackers "get it" and non-trackers are trying to make arguments that make no sense

The Z/28 is a fantastic package for its intended purpose. If people will stop interpreting it as something it is not nor was ever meant to be, we can generate more pixels about its tasty goodness and lose the moronic worry over it's "legality" <face palm>



Thank you Sir. That is the kind of homework I can respect and relate to.



Got ya
shaffe is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 01:42 PM   #41
Witt
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Witt's Avatar
 
Drives: Locomotives
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Aliquippa PA
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Moreno View Post
which reminds me... this guy has been saying all boss 302's come from the factory built around the rulebook. dont the street 302's come with 19" wheels? which violate the 18" max wheel diameter rule that he posted?
T1 permits 19x13 and 19x11 inch wheels which is the class the Boss runs in. The Z/28 brakes prohibit the car from competing in T1.
__________________
Certified Internet Master Mechanic
Witt is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 01:44 PM   #42
www.MorenoMotorsports.com
~ G5Carbon.com ~

 
www.MorenoMotorsports.com's Avatar
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Witt View Post
T1 permits 19x13 and 19x11 inch wheels which is the class the Boss runs in. The Z/28 brakes prohibit the car from competing in T1.
ah. thanks.
__________________
<img src=http://www.camaro5.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=32176&dateline=1430409495 border=0 alt= />
www.MorenoMotorsports.com is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 02:15 PM   #43
Doc
Dances With Mustangs
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS MT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 3,606
Well now... after reading through all this and some of his posts on the Mustang forum it's clear that for some reason he has a chip on his shoulder against me personally. Not sure why; what was his name here on the forum?

He conveniently ignores parts of my posts about the Z/28 that do not fit his "agenda" and rants on about things taken out of context.

In my comments about the Z/28 I've talked about it being a street-legal track car which, as Zfatuated pointed out is quite different from a real race car. Race cars are not street legal for many reasons. Even if a team begins with a production car they strip it down completely and rebuild it from the ground up with everything from safety-wired fasteners to full roll-cages, fire safety systems, telemetry and other gauges, etc. none of which you'll find on a street legal production car because they're completely unnecessary.

His "points" about rules for racing which he seems to think I'm unaware of are not taking into account the other things I mentioned about the Z/28. I've said many times in my comments that there may be a new manufacturer's championship series in the works ala the original Trans Am (the Camaros and Mustangs did not compete in the Can Am series as he mentioned in one of his posts). While looking at what Chevy is doing with the Z/28 much of it seemed at odds with what appears to be its target market; HPDE and weekend racers. I noted this and also made note of Dodge announcing they're making a car to compete with the Z/28 and now Ford has reluctantly admitted they're in this game. Yet they're all holding their cards VERY close to their chest....this all seems odd to me. It looks like the big 3 are playing a huge game of poker and each of them are sitting at the table with millions of R&D dollars ready to be invested...so the stakes are high, but what game are they playing? Is all this really for HPDE and weekend racers?

The Z/28 as stated by GM is NOT "meant" for any current organized racing... Dodge and Ford are in this game now.... Do the massive development investments necessary to create cars with stripped out insulation, making custom shocks, thinner rear window glass, deleting A/C and radios, creating custom wiring harnesses, putting in cooling and track abilities that allow you to run out an entire tank of gas non-stop really sound like it's being aimed at HPDE and weekend racers? It's overkill; big-time. They could have just added an LS7 to a 1LE and made a few other improvements; brought it in for much less than a Z/28 is going to be and it would have sold well; performed beyond 98% of it's customer's abilities. There's no logical reason to do what they're doing (as well as Dodge and Ford spending this kind of development money) if it's just for HPDE and weekend racers. They already have cars that fit that bill quite nicely.

These cars don't fit anything that's current; so what kind of game are the big 3 playing here? My thought is they may be planning a new manufacturer's championship series where the rules will be what the Big 3 (and SCCA) agree they're going to be. I don't have any inside info, I'm making a purely educated guess here but to me it looks like something is in the works that they aren't talking about.... yet. They're being just as secretive about it as they are about the actual performance of these new cars they're developing. Chevy isn't done with the Z/28 yet; why not? Is all this race-level secrecy and development REALLY necessary just for HPDE and weekend racers? IMHO no. The Z/28 has been at least 2 years in development, you can be sure that Dodge and Ford didn't just suddenly decide to start their own development while watching the Z/28 announcement. They're all working on something; they're being very VERY guarded about performance and such. That kind of secrecy isn't needed for HPDE and weekend racers; it IS generally seen when involved with real racing.

I don't know what Mr. Pill's issue is but he seems to have his ego and self-esteem seriously wrapped up with whatever he's driving and who makes it. I understand the rivalry between Chevy and Ford but he seems to be taking it way too far as though the only reason why anyone beats a Ford product is if they were "lucky". Saying that Chevy won the Trans Am with the Z/28 because they got "lucky" when they found Mark Donohue as a driver was just ridiculous.

So let me make my position clear: The Z/28 as we know it so far is a track car that's street legal; it's NOT a real race car that's street legal. I believe it's going to rule in HPDE and I look forward to seeing what Dodge and Ford bring to the table. If they BOTH bring cars with carbon ceramic brakes that aren't legal in any current SCCA series that I know of, then to me that indicates something else that's new might be in the works, which has been my position for some time now. I'm hoping for a new Trans Am or something similar that will be based on these new production track cars and be a new manufacturer's championship series.

Al O and Mark Stielow are not clueless idiots; they know the rules, far more so I'm sure than Mr. Pill does. They have to build cars that meet the massive amounts of laws and regulations for the street; they know what they're doing. It makes no sense for the Big 3 to be dedicating the amount of money it's going to take to bring these cars to market if its just for low-to-no public visibility HPDE and weekend racer track events. That market is so small compared to what they'd need to recover that investment that it just doesn't make any economic sense to be doing this... UNLESS they have something else going on we don't know about... yet. The cost of consumables for tires and brakes alone on these cars is out-of-range for the average Camaro/Mustang/Dodge customer, so who are these cars really being developed for? I do not believe these cars are being developed to "rip people off". I think the next 18 months are going to be VERY interesting.

This is just my opinion and I don't have any privileged access to anything.
__________________

Blue Angel is here!!
1SS/RS LS3 M6 IBM
Doc is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 03:12 PM   #44
2cnd chance
It Will Be Mine
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Z06?
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Road
Posts: 6,614
Racing? That is why GM offers the "body in white" Camaro. I watch them every chance I get in the Continental Tire Series. And they are doing quite well!
__________________
2cnd chance is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 03:15 PM   #45
www.MorenoMotorsports.com
~ G5Carbon.com ~

 
www.MorenoMotorsports.com's Avatar
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2cnd chance View Post
Racing? That is why GM offers the "body in white" Camaro. I watch them every chance I get in the Continental Tire Series. And they are doing quite well!
watching a recording right now while working on some double integrals... LOL
__________________
<img src=http://www.camaro5.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=32176&dateline=1430409495 border=0 alt= />
www.MorenoMotorsports.com is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 03:37 PM   #46
Fraxum


 
Fraxum's Avatar
 
Drives: 2003 Jetta. At least it's red.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Joisey
Posts: 3,879
Send a message via AIM to Fraxum
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc View Post
I've said many times in my comments that there may be a new manufacturer's championship series in the works ala the original Trans Am.
THIS! would be awesome. I was hoping for the same thing, but didn't make the Z/28 connection. I also hope the Z/28 is as good as your car, Doc.
__________________
Fraxum is offline  
Old 07-12-2013, 03:55 PM   #47
SnoopyAce7
(ʘ‿ʘ)
 
SnoopyAce7's Avatar
 
Drives: The one with a roof rack
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,226
So the z/28 will be too good to race SCCA ?
__________________
SnoopyAce7 is offline  
Old 07-13-2013, 12:36 PM   #48
2cnd chance
It Will Be Mine
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Z06?
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Road
Posts: 6,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Moreno View Post
watching a recording right now while working on some double integrals... LOL
__________________
2cnd chance is offline  
Old 07-13-2013, 12:37 PM   #49
2cnd chance
It Will Be Mine
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Z06?
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Road
Posts: 6,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnoopyAce7 View Post
So the z/28 will be too good to race SCCA ?
Let's just say SCCA needs to catch up with technology. Maybe create another class.
__________________
2cnd chance is offline  
Old 07-13-2013, 01:13 PM   #50
Doc
Dances With Mustangs
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS MT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 3,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2cnd chance View Post
Let's just say SCCA needs to catch up with technology. Maybe create another class.
^^this. There's a lot of big money interest involved that I'm sure would like to see the next generation of technology showcased and used on the tracks by classes other than top pros. It's time... I hope.
__________________

Blue Angel is here!!
1SS/RS LS3 M6 IBM
Doc is offline  
Old 07-13-2013, 01:38 PM   #51
MikeSVX
The magic smoke genie....
 
MikeSVX's Avatar
 
Drives: Jewels (2010 RJT 1SS)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,295
The SCCA address rule and car classification changes every year. No reason to think you won't be able to use the car in some type of competition. You may have to wait a year or two for them to figure it out, though.
__________________
Support Search & Rescue.
Get Lost.
MikeSVX is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.