Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Dynomax Exhaust
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2009, 01:28 AM   #1
diV6
 
Drives: 94 camaro z28
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: bay area, ca
Posts: 31
Motortrend: ss v. gt500

Looked but didn't see it posted.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html

gt500 wins, but not by much.
diV6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 05:56 AM   #2
ironpeddler
 
Drives: 2010 Shelby GT500
Join Date: May 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 288
I thought that the Camaro's weight distribution was 50/50? On the spec sheet at the end of this article it sys the Maro's weight distribution is 58/42 same as the Stang.

Last edited by ironpeddler; 07-06-2009 at 07:11 AM.
ironpeddler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 06:36 AM   #3
ihc95
 
ihc95's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW 335i E92
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 649
Arrow VIDEO! Motortrend Drag Race between GT500 and Camaro SS!



At first I thought, "What a poor comparison." But Im suprised to see the Camaro did pretty well against the Shelby. 12.9 @ 111mph?
ihc95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 06:51 AM   #4
Zabo
Gunning for Sixth
 
Zabo's Avatar
 
Drives: '03 ZR2 Blazer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Woodhaven, Michigan
Posts: 9,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by ihc95 View Post


At first I thought, "What a poor comparison." But I'm surprised to see the Camaro did pretty well against the Shelby. 12.9 @ 111mph?
I know.. saw it this morning and just uttered "wat" followed by splashing myself with a cup of coffee to make sure I wasn't dreaming about watching a youtube video of all things.
Zabo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 07:00 AM   #5
NightmareSS

 
NightmareSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS 92 300zx 2001 Ram
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Staten Island, NYC
Posts: 1,388
not bad...camaro held its own pretty dam good...how bout we throw a supercharger on the maro and re-race?
__________________

Last edited by NightmareSS; 07-06-2009 at 06:25 PM.
NightmareSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 07:11 AM   #6
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 2SS MT 45th AE
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,033
Pretty sure it's heavier on the front end.
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 07:35 AM   #7
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 2SS MT 45th AE
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,033
"Just as the Mustang GT is a lot closer to the Camaro SS than its horsepower difference suggests it ought to be, the Camaro SS is a lot closer to the GT500than you'd think."

Looks like the GT500 is the pure raw track car while the SS is the daily driver muscle. I'd say that's pretty accurate and where both manufacturers are trying to position their respective cars. At least they admit it makes more sense to compare it to the GT..... this from the same people who pit the ZR1 against a jet.
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 07:46 AM   #8
MTron
 
Drives: 99 Grand Prix
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by ironpeddler View Post
I thought that the Camaro's weight distribution was 50/50? On the spec sheet at the end of this article it sys the Maro's weight distribution is 58/42 same as the Stang.
hmmm....i thought it was 52/48....but i dont actually remember reading that, so it might just be my wishful thinking!

besides, im sure the aftermarket is going to come out with some stronger, lighter suspension and body parts to replace some of the heavier components to lighten up the car

Just right off the bat, i can see swaybars (but probably heavier for less roll and greter stiffness) IRS control arms, linkages ect, i can see some lighter stuff hear vs the stamped steel stockers.
MTron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 09:29 AM   #9
DevilKnightFalcon

 
DevilKnightFalcon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT/RS
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,406
Send a message via AIM to DevilKnightFalcon Send a message via Yahoo to DevilKnightFalcon
Well duh the GT500 destroyed the SS. That is like saying "OMG the GT500 destroyed a Mustang GT!!". If you want a fair race pit a stock SS against a stock GT and we'll see who wins. Just wait for the Z28...then we'll see how well the little GT500 holds up.
__________________

MBRP Catback/Magnaflow Resonated X/Airraid V2 CAI/Dash ABL/Interior LEDs/Custom Paint/Jet Coated American Racing LT Headers/High Flow cats/Trifecta Tune
DevilKnightFalcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 09:29 AM   #10
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 2SS MT 45th AE
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,033
Yup, they said traction was a major issue with the GT500 stock rubber but not so with the Camaro. The Camaro made up the HP deficit there.
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 09:58 AM   #11
MerlinZero
Big Orange
 
MerlinZero's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilKnightFalcon View Post
Well duh the GT500 destroyed the SS. That is like saying "OMG the GT500 destroyed a Mustang GT!!". If you want a fair race pit a stock SS against a stock GT and we'll see who wins. Just wait for the Z28...then we'll see how well the little GT500 holds up.
They'd already done that. Thats what brought about this race.
__________________
" First, there was darkness, Then, On March 16th, Scott said LET THERE BE CAMARO, and there was Camaro, and Scott saw that it was good. Camaro5 3:16"

VIN: 2G1FT1EWXA9120523
ETA 7/6/09 (Delivered 7/10/09)
MerlinZero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 10:05 AM   #12
c0rsa180
 
c0rsa180's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS IOM
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 208
I love the ending, you get what you pay for, and in this case you pay an extra $580 per foot...

I'm impressed the camaro held up as well as it did!
__________________


Inferno Orange Metallic
2SS
RS
M6
ordered 2/17/09
c0rsa180 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 10:09 AM   #13
Andro
NOICE!!! ™
 
Andro's Avatar
 
Drives: Force Fed 427
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: GOT BOOST?
Posts: 5,214
Not bad for a N/A car against a F/I vehicle
__________________
Andro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 10:18 AM   #14
PsyDoc
 
Drives: Soon-to-be 1st Gen
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southeast
Posts: 249
I love how they state that it's not a fair comparison and the time they got out of the Camaro are very good. The one thing that was just awful for me was when they revved the engines. The Mustang sounded like a muscle car; the Camaro much less so...and I am referring to that rattle-can sound at the very end of the Camaro's rev.
PsyDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 Number 3 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 31 04-17-2011 03:24 PM
Help the Camaro win Motortrend's Championship truth411 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 56 07-02-2009 05:10 AM
Motorgen LA Invasion Videos (58) and Pics Thread SeanPlunk USA - California 5 05-31-2009 01:23 AM
2010 Camaro SS vs 2009 Shelby GT500 price difference(and Challenger SRT8) porcupinekiller 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 30 03-01-2009 12:22 PM
Camaro SS vs GT500 not KR chewy4ce 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 99 01-29-2009 10:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.