Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2009, 01:10 PM   #29
RLHMARINES
1st Civ. Div.
 
RLHMARINES's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Black, aka "Big SexZ"
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,111
The motor trend video was shot at my old duty station that's been closed down in southern orange county in the city of Irvine, Ca. Made a visit back in Jan and the place is almost completely torn down, brought tears to my eyes.:flag1:

Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) El Toro had two 8,000 feet long runways and two 10,000 feet long runways located on the 5 freeway not far from the "Y" intersection of the 5 and 405 freeways.
RLHMARINES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 01:17 PM   #30
Xanthos
Almost-Original Postwhore
 
Xanthos's Avatar
 
Drives: Stick
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 12,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilKnightFalcon View Post
Well duh the GT500 destroyed the SS. That is like saying "OMG the GT500 destroyed a Mustang GT!!". If you want a fair race pit a stock SS against a stock GT and we'll see who wins. Just wait for the Z28...then we'll see how well the little GT500 holds up.
It beat it by a tenth and you consider that "destroyed?"

Heck, even if you look at best trap speeds between the two, 118 vs 111 is a difference, but is it a 17,000 dollar difference?

I think not.
- X
__________________
Xanthos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 02:32 PM   #31
Lauryn200
I Pity The Fool
 
Lauryn200's Avatar
 
Drives: Jeep Wrangler '06 & VW GTI 09
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 875
Ooooooooooooo someone needs to race all three muscle cars..side by side

Dodge vs Chevy vs Ford....... "Bring It"
__________________
........"Is custom faded?"
Jeep Wrangler 06 & VW GTI 09
"My Fast"-
Lauryn200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 02:32 PM   #32
Jeffro19

 
Jeffro19's Avatar
 
Drives: 1991 GMC Syclone, 2016 Silverado HC
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 1,887
If thats the best Ford can do with a 50k mustang? That is something I wouldnt be proud of
__________________
Previous Camaro's - 2002 Z28 6 spd manual, T tops, Sebring Silver - 2010 2SS 6 spd manual, Cyber Gray Metallic

Current Vehicles - 1991 GMC Syclone, All original, 8600 miles - 2016 Silverado High Country, Daily Driver
Jeffro19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 02:36 PM   #33
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,495
stop it.

Both of you.

please.

Stay on Topic.
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 03:07 PM   #34
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by snizzle View Post
Yup, they said traction was a major issue with the GT500 stock rubber but not so with the Camaro. The Camaro made up the HP deficit there.
Agreed but only for the first 1/8th. After that the power in the GT500 is just too much.

But, I am stoked that the ss hung in there. another 12 sec run. Awesome.

Great Vid. And I'm not buying that mustang guys see the gt500 as a direct competitor to the SS. My guess is Motor trend needed an excuse for this comparison...

GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 04:20 PM   #35
Sack Rat 2SS

 
Sack Rat 2SS's Avatar
 
Drives: Silver SS/RS, Man 6
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DFW area, Texas
Posts: 882
The 29 feet win margin is approx. two car lengths. Still not too shaby. I agree with the earlier post regardint the tinny sounding exhaust during burnout's. Also, the Mustang would be a great little roadcourse car.
__________________
Silver 2SS/RS Man/6
CTS-V front 6-Piston Calipers,
GM 3.91 Rear Gears
Sack Rat 2SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 04:28 PM   #36
Camaro_Corvette
36.833283,-76.021958
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTAHVIT View Post
Agreed but only for the first 1/8th. After that the power in the GT500 is just too much.

But, I am stoked that the ss hung in there. another 12 sec run. Awesome.

Great Vid. And I'm not buying that mustang guys see the gt500 as a direct competitor to the SS. My guess is Motor trend needed an excuse for this comparison...

They were bored... Everybody knows the results of this race. It's simple physics. Just a bunch of guys with nothing better to do than pit two really fast cars against each other. A job I would not mind having by the way.
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 05:04 PM   #37
Sleestack
 
Sleestack's Avatar
 
Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by XanthosV6 View Post
Heck, even if you look at best trap speeds between the two, 118 vs 111 is a difference, but is it a 17,000 dollar difference?

I think not.
- X

Trap speed shows the true power of a vehicle. Are you aware that Stock C6's trap around 116mph? 118mph is pretty significant. I guess the driver of a Toyota Camry (101mph trap) may be equally unimpressed by the Camaro SS (111mph trap).
__________________
Sleestack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 05:05 PM   #38
Elvisuperman
TCB
 
Elvisuperman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Chevrolet Malibu LT
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 137
B.S review in my opinion.
__________________
GM Forever!
Elvisuperman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 05:10 PM   #39
syr74
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Thunderbird
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
Interesting to me how the comparos are all over the place. Car and Driver preferred the Mustang GT to the Camaro SS while Motor Trend preferred the the SS to the GT. Take it up a notch to the GT500 and, in Motor Trend's opinion, the GT500 arguably eeks out a less convincing win than the GT did over the SS in the Car and Driver issue, although none of those victories was a landslide by any means.

I think the most telling aspect of all of these comparos is that all of them seem to be wins by a nose so to speak.
syr74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 05:35 PM   #40
Supermans
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
 
Supermans's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ#48Racing View Post
It's clear the Gt500's disadvantage is in the tires. The 4 1/2 mph advantage the GT500 had over the SS is a much better indication of potential than the 0.1 sec e.t. would suggest. If the GT500 was running the same tires, it would have widened it's margin of victory significantly. That being said, the SS is impressive and I'd rather have it with or without a supercharger over the GT500, but that's JMHO.
To the credit of the Motor Trend Review, they did use the stock tires both cars came with.. You'd have to spend more money on the GT500 to give it the same quality tires the Camaro SS has.. The Camaro did a good job keeping up and in no way is humiliated by this defeat. On the contrary, for less than $7,000 more, you can get a faster car than the GT500's base price....
__________________
Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266
Supermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 05:46 PM   #41
MuscleCarz
 
Drives: 5.4 3v
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Lake
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by syr74 View Post
Interesting to me how the comparos are all over the place. Car and Driver preferred the Mustang GT to the Camaro SS while Motor Trend preferred the the SS to the GT. Take it up a notch to the GT500 and, in Motor Trend's opinion, the GT500 arguably eeks out a less convincing win than the GT did over the SS in the Car and Driver issue, although none of those victories was a landslide by any means.

I think the most telling aspect of all of these comparos is that all of them seem to be wins by a nose so to speak.
Even the GT500 v Hennesy Camaro comparison comes to mind.

This just proves that people should buy what they like! That's what really matters anyway when making such a big purchase.
MuscleCarz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 05:52 PM   #42
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack View Post
Trap speed shows the true power of a vehicle. Are you aware that Stock C6's trap around 116mph? 118mph is pretty significant. I guess the driver of a Toyota Camry (101mph trap) may be equally unimpressed by the Camaro SS (111mph trap).

Trap speed is great, but it doesn't win races. (E.T.) wins races. I also have a feeling a Camaro SS can beat a Camry by more than .1 tenth in a street race 1/4 mile. But this video shows (stock vs stock), the Camaro can hold its own prettty good against a Cobra GT500.
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 Number 3 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 31 04-17-2011 03:24 PM
Help the Camaro win Motortrend's Championship truth411 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 56 07-02-2009 05:10 AM
Motorgen LA Invasion Videos (58) and Pics Thread SeanPlunk USA - California 5 05-31-2009 01:23 AM
2010 Camaro SS vs 2009 Shelby GT500 price difference(and Challenger SRT8) porcupinekiller 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 30 03-01-2009 12:22 PM
Camaro SS vs GT500 not KR chewy4ce 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 99 01-29-2009 10:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.