Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
BeckyD@RodgersChevrolet
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-19-2008, 06:11 PM   #113
Maven
Bowtie Technician
 
Drives: 1969 Corvette
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 38
WOW, this one is going nuts. I think everyone needs to calm down and for a multitude of reasones. Like has been said, they arent making you buy a 4cyl car.....Its not destroying any heritage or tradition because the Camaro has had a four-banger before. It also shouldnt be a real big suprise because that they are gonna offer multiple lower level engines(non-V8s) nor should it be a cause anyone to wanna scream blasphemy since the only years that Chevy sold more V8 than base Camaros was during the IROC frenzy in 85-88.

I like several others are vey happy that they are planning on installing the LNF(2.0 turbo) into the Camaro as the base engine. Its so far superior to the 60deg OHV engines that its not even funny. I wouldve been pissed if they put a 3.5/3.9 in the Camaro.

Now lets get to the power issue. This engine makes 260hp @5300rpm, and 260ftlbs @ 2000rpm. No its not a typo. thats TWO HUNDRED SIXTY pounds of torque at 2,000rpm. So it actually makes MORE torque than the 3.6L LY7(253ftlbs), and it loses the hp race by only 3. More important is HOW the LNF delivers its power. There is 260ftlbs of torque available from 2,000rpm ALL THE WAY to the horsepower peak of 5300rpm. Max torque from 2,000-5,300.
The 3.6L cant claim that.

As for lacking power in general....Well the LNF Sky's and Solsti' are putting down 240's to the GROUND. Thats only about 10hp less than a stock LT1.

The ECO's also have a great aftermarket whereas the 3.6L's.....well, dont.

The ECO also responds well to mods, and has extremely high potential, you can get over 300hp at the crank from just a handheld tuner!!!!

The ECOTEC engine itself is good to about 550hp with a simple rod/piston upgrade.

Solstice guys are getting 20+hp from intercooler upgrades.


I see the inclusion of the ECOTEC brand in the new Camaro as a great thing, now instead of only having one engine worth upgrading(the V8) and therefore having a hefty initial purchase price if your looking to be able easily modify your car, we now have two. This I feel is going to make the Camaro appealing to MANY more people, especially if GM campaigns a base Camaro in the Drift series, or offers "tuner" type cars with limited options, designed to be blank slates for the customizing companies out there or setup like the "Club Sport" Solstices for SCCA racing, I can see the LNF F's becoming very popular, and doing well in a class like G-stock Solo by destroying V6 Mustangs and 4Th gen F's

Since having our 3rd car cost 30k is out of the question, I can see myself driving a Camaro that goes PSSHHHHHHT. and being perfectly happy about it.
__________________
ASE Master Auto Technician & Advanced Engine Performance Specialist
GM Mark Of Excellence Platinum Award winner

Oft consequences unintended, result from plans ill comprehended.
Maven is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:12 PM   #114
flaguy
 
flaguy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 2SS RS Spring Edition
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ga
Posts: 230
Last week I was under the impression that the Camaro will be priced with the Mustang, that the V6 will have 300hp, that a turbo was going into the cobalt. Today I find the Camaro will cost more, excuse me, will be at a premium compared to the Mustang, the V6 just lost 40hp, and the turbo has entered the Camaro.

What next? Dare I say it???????????????
























PREPO HEADLIGHTS ARE STAYING???????????


After reading this thread, I'm sure GM could **** this up some more....they're on a good start.
flaguy is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:13 PM   #115
Warghost
 
Drives: Camaros & Mustangs
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Port St Lucie, FL.
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
He didn't completely drop it. He said it will be more, and that's nothing new. If you're thinking thousands more...your insane (and if that's the truth...well, so's GM.) But ~$1000 more for an EXTREMELY superior car. That's not unreasonable to me.
I agree. I don't think a Camaro will be $5,000 more than a comparably priced Mustang. That would be suicide and GM knows it. However, considering the full independent suspension, better interior quality and components, upgraded wheel packages (20"+), etc., I think Lutz was just preparing the public for the bottom line: nice options cost more money. I don't think this is anything we should be concerned with, and I don't think it's anything most people weren't prepared to hear anyway. And these options aren't even available with the Mustang or Challenger anyway!

Getting back to the 4-cylinder turbo motor....I can definitely understand how some people find this engine to be "un-American". It's got small displacement and a power adding system usually only found in European and Japanese vehicles. American muscle has usually been the opposite: large naturally aspirated displacement. I would prefer GM not release a 4-cyl turbo, because it's automatically associated with the ricer crowd, but if it's necessary to keep the Camaro alive, then so be it. I wouldn't want to own one, but it wouldn't be any worse than a 210HP V6, right? That's what the Mustang is offering in their base model.

Just keep the faith, guys. Like I said earlier, I am happy to hear the Camaro will not be a "cheap" car anymore, that can only help its reputation and status...and I'm pretty sure that it will still be priced about the same as a COMPARABLE Mustang. But just remember, there will be no Mustang or Challenger that is comparable to this car!
Warghost is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:14 PM   #116
linkwpc
The punching cat
 
linkwpc's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro SS Black W/Hugger&W/IOI
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 4,046
The only thing I have to say is that I'm NOT buying 4 or 6 for my new car! 4 cyl just sucks!
linkwpc is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:15 PM   #117
Sweeper
 
Sweeper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Suburban
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 40
Camaro's Korean cousin






Camaro's Korean cousin
Set for public debut at the New York Auto show in two days, press photos of the yet to be revealed Hyundai Genesis Coupe have leaked. Sent to us as a tip (thanks Evan), the photos were found over at MyRide.com who added these pictures to an old article from the Genesis Coupe Concept debut in Los Angeles last year.

If the new Genesis sedan is an indicator of things to come, the Genesis Coupe, as the Tiburon replacement, will be a far superior car with greater quality, performance and driving dynamics. With a rear wheel drive platform and the entry level engine as a 2.0 liter turbo producing 215hp, the Genesis Coupe is off to a great start. But Hyundai is out for blood and takes it a bit further with a 3.8 liter V6 making approximately 310hp. As a result, the Genesis Coupe is going to get a lot of attention in New York and it's no surprise why.

Awww. Look. It's next to a Mustang. I wonder what it will look like next to the Camaro???
Sweeper is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:26 PM   #118
Jose_The_Great_Cuervo
 
Jose_The_Great_Cuervo's Avatar
 
Drives: Purple/Pink Ford Escort Lx
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 65
"3.8 liter V6 making approximately 310hp"

Wow, if a this and a Caddy w/ a V6 can produce that much hp then I don't see why the Camaro can't ATLEAST match it...
Jose_The_Great_Cuervo is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:26 PM   #119
Sweeper
 
Sweeper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Suburban
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maven View Post
Since having our 3rd car cost 30k is out of the question, I can see myself driving a Camaro that goes PSSHHHHHHT. and being perfectly happy about it.
I second that remark. If the base model is priced low enough. It would be the a steal!!! I would love to have a low priced RWD sports car with the great looks of a Camaro.

What do you think about.....
$24k 4 cylinder turbo_____260hp
$32k DI V6_____________306hp
$40k V8________________400hp
$50k Supercharged V8____500hp
Sweeper is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:29 PM   #120
stevenm357
 
Drives: 98 Trans am 00 Trans am 01 corvette
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 380
awesome news... since i may have to wait an extra year or two... i'll hope they come out with a real GT500 destroyer shortly after
__________________

2001 Corvette
Heads,Big cam, 4:11, Custom Exhaust, MGW Shifter Baer Eradispeed +2 2 pieces rotors, Hotchkiss swaybars. and a few other little things.

1998 Trans Am A4 ( was STS turbo until the turbo and oil pump died)

2000 WS6 Trans AM under the knife ( sadly turned into long term project.
stevenm357 is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:29 PM   #121
z28camaro2471
C5 Member #227
 
z28camaro2471's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaros
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 808
I'm all for selling more Camaros. I understand economics, business, etc. If the I4 got 45 mpg, the v6 got 28 mph and the v8 got let's say 18mpg, I could completely understand the business case. Additionally, if the I4 Camaro was $18,000, the v6 Camaro was $23,000 and the base v8 was $28,000, again I could understand the business case.

There are problems with both of the above, the fuel economy on the I4 (as noted in 1 or maybe 2 previous posts) is not that much better than the v6. I'm guessing on the second one because we have no knowledge on price, but I don't see the I4 undercutting the v6 that much by price.

And that's why I want to hurl when they mention putting a 4 cylinder in the new Camaro. Yes, I do remember the Iron Dukes. And yes I know the turbo 4 only makes 15 hp less than my LT1 so I know it's a hot little motor. I like that motor in the Cobalt, HHR, Solstice etc. It just doesn't work for me in a Camaro. Just my opinion.
z28camaro2471 is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:29 PM   #122
Maven
Bowtie Technician
 
Drives: 1969 Corvette
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweeper View Post
I second that remark. If the base model is priced low enough. It would be the a steal!!! I would love to have a low priced RWD sports car with the great looks of a Camaro.

What do you think about.....
$24k 4 cylinder turbo_____260hp
$32k DI V6_____________306hp
$40k V8________________400hp
$50k Supercharged V8____500hp
I prefer.....
$24k 4 cylinder turbo____260hp > FE1 suspension, 5spd Auto or Manual
$28k DI V6_____________306hp > FE1 suspension, FE3 optional, 6spd auto or manual
$31k V8_______________430hp > FE3 suspension, 6spd auto or manual, better brakes
$42k Supercharged V8____550hp >FE5 Suspension, 6spd manual, Brembo(iron or carbon) brakes
__________________
ASE Master Auto Technician & Advanced Engine Performance Specialist
GM Mark Of Excellence Platinum Award winner

Oft consequences unintended, result from plans ill comprehended.
Maven is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:34 PM   #123
CHVY4LF
Chevrolet For Life!!
 
CHVY4LF's Avatar
 
Drives: 07 Chevrolet Silverado Classic
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black5thgen View Post
You guys are rediculous. Has everyone forgot about the 4 cylinder camaro's of the 80's. It didn't disgrace the car's rep then, why will it now. In the 80's we were getting over the gas crunch and the ecomony sucked (just like today) and the I4 only lasted a few years. I think a 4 is a great idea. It will help with the fleet mpg's and lower the price for non-enthusiasts. WE ARE STILL GETTING THE V8, whats the big deal. Yeah, maybe ricers will buy the I-4 turbo, but that means more sales insuring the future of the camaro. The more people this car appeals to the better. The camaro has to adapt and evolve to survive. Let's not forget that the car went on hiautus because it didn't evolve. All of you that are upset that the camaro can be offered with a 4 are obsured. Go buy a turbo cobalt and get jelous when I blow past in my V8 fifth gen.
Completely agree, not only that but the I4 will get alot more people to buy camaro and that way GM won't cut production again.
__________________
When You're Really Good In A Past Life, You Come Back As Yourself!

Future Plate: PNYHNTR
Camaro of Choice: 2010 SS 6.2L 6M IOM
Current Ride: 2007 Silverado Classic Ext. Cab 5.3L DBM

CHVY4LF is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:35 PM   #124
The_Stache
SoCal Race Team #13
 
The_Stache's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS:RS:LS3:SW
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweeper View Post
I second that remark. If the base model is priced low enough. It would be the a steal!!! I would love to have a low priced RWD sports car with the great looks of a Camaro.

What do you think about.....
$24k 4 cylinder turbo_____260hp
$32k DI V6_____________306hp
$40k V8________________400hp
$50k Supercharged V8____500hp
Try this on .. its more likely the closer to the real thing..

$19k 4 cylinder turbo_____260hp
$24k DI V6_____________306hp
$32k V8________________400hp
$40k Supercharged V8____500hp
__________________
A.K.A - Diarmadhi (old handle) - So much to do.. So little money
Owner : Fast-Stache Industries LLC
The_Stache is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:37 PM   #125
z28camaro2471
C5 Member #227
 
z28camaro2471's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaros
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by diarmadhi View Post
Try this on .. its more likely the closer to the real thing..

$19k 4 cylinder turbo_____260hp
$24k DI V6_____________306hp
$32k V8________________400hp
$40k Supercharged V8____500hp
That would make sense. And then I wouldn't complain about a 4 cylinder.
z28camaro2471 is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:39 PM   #126
09fathomgreen
 
Drives: 1997 Ford
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 52
Just my two cents--to me, it doesn't matter if the engine is a four-cylinder or a V8. It's still a Camaro, and I plan on buying what I can afford regardless. I've never owned a Camaro, and I will buy a fifth gen. (Always wanted one, just never had the chance.)
To me, that's what matters--that GM is trying to return a classic car to production, which will hopefully be a quality product that will be in production for years to come.
09fathomgreen is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro ls3 news...true or false? Dark Knight Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 74 06-05-2008 05:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.