Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Cold Air Inductions
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-03-2008, 06:46 PM   #1
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: Off Into The Sunset
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cape Coral, Florida
Posts: 3,842
Exclamation New Camaro Could Get This Engine: Pontiac Solstice Coupe to pack 300 horses?

Whoa...Since Camaro is a candidate for the current 260hp 4cyl. turbo, it could wind up with this version of the same engine.

I still have to have my 400hp plus V8 with manual trans, but this could make Camaro even more appealing for more people, and help CAFE numbers so we can keep driving our V8's.



http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/03/s...ck-300-horses/
camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 06:57 PM   #2
NOODLESgoneWILD
IS IT 2009 YET???
 
NOODLESgoneWILD's Avatar
 
Drives: '05 Z51 Black Vette & '06 H2
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mill Creek, Washington
Posts: 408
Send a message via MSN to NOODLESgoneWILD
HHMMmmmmmmmmmmm...Very interesting! What kind of MPG would this engine produce in the new camaro??? 22 to 28??? (HYW)
__________________
Don't love me just for my FBod
NOODLESgoneWILD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 07:02 PM   #3
jhitson
 
jhitson's Avatar
 
Drives: 88 Camaro, 01 S-10, 06 G6 GTP
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 78
Thats cool I guess. I like the solstice because, in my opinion, it is what the corvette was originally intended to be. A small 2-seat roadster. Now the vette is "supercar". I understand the upping the power to compete, but that is what has taken the vette so far from its roots. Would be a nice option in the camaro.
jhitson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 07:11 PM   #4
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: Off Into The Sunset
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cape Coral, Florida
Posts: 3,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOODLESgoneWILD View Post
HHMMmmmmmmmmmmm...Very interesting! What kind of MPG would this engine produce in the new camaro??? 22 to 28??? (HYW)
Well, Bob Lutz said the 3.6L V6 gets 17mpg city, 25mpg hwy.

So this 2.0L 4cyl should do better if you stay off the boost.

Probably 28mpg hwy could happen, or maybe 30mpg which I saw quoted way back.

I just saw a Kia commercial with their little POS bragging about 32 mpg hwy. No performance, style, or comfort.

Everyone's going to need a Camaro - different versions for different people. Then it can live forever!
camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 07:46 PM   #5
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 23,079
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
I love the power/mileage ratio that GM's cars produce. I don't want a 4 banger in my Camaro. Even if it had 400 hp, I'd still rather have the V8. I don't expect this 300 hp engine to deliver spectacular mileage though. Look at the Evo and the WRX STi. They make ~300 hp on a turbo I4 and get mid 20's for mileage and be a little bit lighter than the Camaro will be, not too much though.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 08:55 PM   #6
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,816
Pontiac NEEDS to make a 4 door AWD sedan/hatch and put this new upgraded engine in it to go head to head to head with the STI and Evo. Now that would be a G5 to be proud of.
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 09:13 PM   #7
Camaro68


 
Camaro68's Avatar
 
Drives: 68 Camaro 327ci 2SS/RS 376ci LS3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Prince William, VA
Posts: 2,697
Talking for all the rest that likes way better gas mpg

But I would still get the V8 V8 V8 LS3 gota have more power
Camaro68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 11:36 PM   #8
LS9CamaroSS
 
LS9CamaroSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Cavalier RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jordan, NY
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhitson View Post
Thats cool I guess. I like the solstice because, in my opinion, it is what the corvette was originally intended to be. A small 2-seat roadster. Now the vette is "supercar". I understand the upping the power to compete, but that is what has taken the vette so far from its roots. Would be a nice option in the camaro.
how has the Vette strayed from its roots at all? still all fiberglass body. The first one to be non-fiberglass will be the ZR1 with fiberglass/CF on it. it hasn't changed size really. It still has 2 seats, and it still has only V8's in the engine bay. so where has the straying happened? Because back in the day the C1 was a world class contender in autosports...
LS9CamaroSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 01:14 AM   #9
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 23,079
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS9CamaroSS View Post
how has the Vette strayed from its roots at all? still all fiberglass body. The first one to be non-fiberglass will be the ZR1 with fiberglass/CF on it. it hasn't changed size really. It still has 2 seats, and it still has only V8's in the engine bay. so where has the straying happened? Because back in the day the C1 was a world class contender in autosports...
when I think of C1's I think of a happy little roadster not a world beating sports car. After that it got an attitude adjustment and became an icon. Thats how I see it. If you were to debadge the cars and sit a C1, a C6, and Solstice. Then get someone who doesn't know anything about cars, and tell them one car is an old corvette, which is the new corvette? I'd bet most would say the pontiac and not the C6.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 08:08 AM   #10
BumbleBee
Yes, I am a girl
 
BumbleBee's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Pontiac Vibe
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 379
Talking Don't forget the Vibe

Quote:
Originally Posted by stovt001 View Post
Pontiac NEEDS to make a 4 door AWD sedan/hatch and put this new upgraded engine in it to go head to head to head with the STI and Evo. Now that would be a G5 to be proud of.
Pontiac already makes a hatchback, Vibe, but I do agree they need to put a more powerful engine in it. The 2.4 4 cyl is an upgrade from the 1.6 of prevous years, but they need a turbo.
__________________
You can check on the rep...

...second to none
BumbleBee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 10:26 AM   #11
Bruno
 
Drives: 2010 CGM 2SS
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: OH now
Posts: 315
Excellent news! SC cars are easy to extract more power from too. Could we possibly see many turbo 4's with higher hp's than V6 versions with just a reflash or chip??
Bruno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 12:00 PM   #12
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno View Post
Excellent news! SC cars are easy to extract more power from too. Could we possibly see many turbo 4's with higher hp's than V6 versions with just a reflash or chip??


This is exactly the thinking I've had and why I would prefer FI this go around. It's hard to identify a pulley change whereas a big cam or big exhaust will wave a big flag where I live. Shoot, a boost controller on that turbo engine would easily allow it to make more power and most would not know the better. Of course, this could come at an expense to durability in the long-run...

I can't do as much cool or fun stuff to my car because of the tree huggers so even though I won't be looking at a turbo-4 or V6, I think it's these little engines that will allow our car to have engines that I, personally, hope will be available in a few years. Everything around here revolves around CARB numbers so the more stealthy my modifications, the better.

To sum up: anything GM can do to give us the most power for good fuel economy the better (DUH!) If this will allow GM to creap even more powerful engines into the line-up later, EVEN BETTER. If you ask me: WAY TO GO GM!!!
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 12:26 AM   #13
JustinZS
 
Drives: waitin on 2010 !!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003 View Post


This is exactly the thinking I've had and why I would prefer FI this go around. It's hard to identify a pulley change whereas a big cam or big exhaust will wave a big flag where I live. Shoot, a boost controller on that turbo engine would easily allow it to make more power and most would not know the better. Of course, this could come at an expense to durability in the long-run...
A boost controller (ECU reflash or piggyback etc.) won't necessarily come at the expense of durability. I'm not sure what the top end and how good the internals on the ECOTEC engines are but if it's high, upping the boost a bit won't really hurt durability in the long run.

The idea of a boosted Camaro is definitely new to me and something I gotta get used to but it really does open up new sales demographic and big aftermarket tuning market.
JustinZS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 02:16 AM   #14
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003 View Post


This is exactly the thinking I've had and why I would prefer FI this go around. It's hard to identify a pulley change whereas a big cam or big exhaust will wave a big flag where I live. Shoot, a boost controller on that turbo engine would easily allow it to make more power and most would not know the better. Of course, this could come at an expense to durability in the long-run...

I can't do as much cool or fun stuff to my car because of the tree huggers so even though I won't be looking at a turbo-4 or V6, I think it's these little engines that will allow our car to have engines that I, personally, hope will be available in a few years. Everything around here revolves around CARB numbers so the more stealthy my modifications, the better.

To sum up: anything GM can do to give us the most power for good fuel economy the better (DUH!) If this will allow GM to creap even more powerful engines into the line-up later, EVEN BETTER. If you ask me: WAY TO GO GM!!!
I know what you're saying. My future brother in law lives in Elk Grove and apparently gets nailed all the time for supposedly illegal mods on his car all the time. Apparently a big problem up there is that the police really enforce the "each mod by itself passes CARB, but together they don't" regulations. His friend who works as a tuner says all of their cars pass the sniffer test, but get nailed on visual inspections. One more reason I'm looking to get out of California. Kinda , but does anyone know how the car emissions laws are in Florida? In the company I work for, everyone seems to do some time out there, so that's probably where I'll end up.
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 02:35 AM   #15
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: Off Into The Sunset
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cape Coral, Florida
Posts: 3,842
Emissions? What's that?

No inspections at all.

I think it's wild what you guys go through in Cali.

Come on down to Florida - the air's fine and CARB is just something I used to have on my car engine made by Holley.
camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 11:13 AM   #16
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro5 View Post
Emissions? What's that?

No inspections at all.

I think it's wild what you guys go through in Cali.

Come on down to Florida - the air's fine and CARB is just something I used to have on my car engine made by Holley.
Eat crap j/k California sucks...

Yeah; if we get pulled over, and don't have CARB numbers showing, on the parts themselves, they'll write us up a ticket and we get to pay a big fine and even go to the smog referee sometimes. I've been there and done that. That's why I'm pushing a forced-induction engine option since it will be easier to sneak by a visual inspection. I don't think a pulley or boost controller really comes into play under conditions smog tests are conducted so it just seems like it will be easier to get more power without running the risk of fines.

I think 300 horses to start is great though.
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2008, 06:02 AM   #17
leifhain
 
Drives: lancia delta integrale
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: belgium
Posts: 6
My experience (Lancia Thema V6 and 2.0 Turbo) makes me believe that the 4 cyl 2.0 Turbo will only have a better fuel economy than the V6 if you stay off the throttle. Most people can't. I definitely would go for the V6 if it comes to fuel economy.
leifhain is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro Product Manager - interview Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 11 04-04-2012 07:10 PM
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 08:33 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 08:05 PM
Camaro (concept) Press Release!! Pencil.Fight 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 4 07-21-2008 04:33 PM
Holden Monaro coupe could be produced Scotsman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 4 03-11-2008 10:27 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.