Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
BORLA
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-27-2009, 08:40 AM   #15
levi1922

 
levi1922's Avatar
 
Drives: 2LT RS CGM
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,379
first person to post a picture wins!
__________________
levi1922 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 08:42 AM   #16
ssump29
LOL at most people here.
 
ssump29's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 GTO,2006 M6, 2007 300 Touring
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 1,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOLDDOG View Post
Back up sensors on your muscle cars, not good. I have them on our minivan and thats where they belong. Bet ya the Mustang and Challenger forums will have a field day with this option.
HMM no, you can get back sensors in the Mustang right now so why would they have a field day. And where does it say you can have sensors on a muscle car. Step into the 2000s man where tech is king quit living in the past.
__________________
Number 5952. oh yeahhhhhhh
ssump29 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 08:43 AM   #17
CamaroScotty
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Your new SLP Camaro!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cedarburg, WI
Posts: 6,801
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroScotty
Back up sensors will be included on the 2SS, 2LT and 1LT w/SRJ package.
CamaroScotty is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 08:45 AM   #18
jcamere94z28

 
jcamere94z28's Avatar
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,269
more useless weight... lol they should be taking weight out... instead of adding weight (any)
jcamere94z28 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 08:48 AM   #19
Dan3
Captain of the Failboat
 
Dan3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USAF Seymour Johnson- Goldsboro, NC
Posts: 405
Not a fan of backup sensors, I just know how big my assend is.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS - Imperial Blue w/Black Leather Interior
Ordered - 22 June 2009
Produced - 10 August 2009 : #34143
Delivered - 25 August 2009
Dan3 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 08:50 AM   #20
ssump29
LOL at most people here.
 
ssump29's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 GTO,2006 M6, 2007 300 Touring
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 1,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcamere94z28 View Post
more useless weight... lol they should be taking weight out... instead of adding weight (any)
Given the fact that the majority of people buying these cars aren't planning to be race heads, your point is moot. More non-racers will buy these cars then you think, the majority sold will be V6s so I'm pretty sure people buying the V6s aren't worried about being the fastest and worrying about the weight of the car.
__________________
Number 5952. oh yeahhhhhhh
ssump29 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 08:51 AM   #21
R6P

 
R6P's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Quahog, Rhode Island
Posts: 1,161
[QUOTE=caverman;849947]Can someone confirm the increase in MSRP? I heard it was basically $300 increase.

Yes, $295.00
R6P is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 08:53 AM   #22
GOLDDOG
 
GOLDDOG's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT/RS & 08 JSB Corvette
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssump29 View Post
HMM no, you can get back sensors in the Mustang right now so why would they have a field day. And where does it say you can have sensors on a muscle car. Step into the 2000s man where tech is king quit living in the past.
I'm all for tech. But as a proud V6 owner, it funny how our cars are considered inferior, by some - not all, because we didn't get the true muscle car V8. It is my opinion that it doesn't belong on this type of car, thats all.
__________________
GOLDDOG is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 08:59 AM   #23
levi1922

 
levi1922's Avatar
 
Drives: 2LT RS CGM
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOLDDOG View Post
I'm all for tech. But as a proud V6 owner, it funny how our cars are considered inferior, by some - not all, because we didn't get the true muscle car V8. It is my opinion that it doesn't belong on this type of car, thats all.


im a fan boy for the park assist, but for some who have view such as yours, there should be a delete option on 2SS ans 2LT.
__________________
levi1922 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 08:59 AM   #24
MLL67RSSS

 
MLL67RSSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 67 Indy Pace Car
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,472
Judging from the back-up light discussions, I forsee an abundance of "OMG ugly back up sensors" threads and posts. Gee I can hardly wait.
MLL67RSSS is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 09:00 AM   #25
MikesZ
Group Provocateur
 
Drives: Long Distances
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,022
IMO this is a good choice by GM to add the backup sensors. Many people have requested this feature in multiple threads on this website. It is great that GM is listening.
MikesZ is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 09:05 AM   #26
ssump29
LOL at most people here.
 
ssump29's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 GTO,2006 M6, 2007 300 Touring
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 1,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOLDDOG View Post
I'm all for tech. But as a proud V6 owner, it funny how our cars are considered inferior, by some - not all, because we didn't get the true muscle car V8. It is my opinion that it doesn't belong on this type of car, thats all.
Where did I ever say the v6 was considered inferior?? I didn't, I respond to a post that said they need to lower weight not add it and my reply was simply that the majority of people buying this car will buy a V6, meaning they aren't looking for more ways to get faster. There's nothing wrong with the V6 at all and I never knocked it I simply pointed out that have a car weight less means nothing to the general public.
__________________
Number 5952. oh yeahhhhhhh
ssump29 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 09:06 AM   #27
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,714
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
No thanks. I have mirrors.
__________________
PQ is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 09:07 AM   #28
Ammo7
I GOT HER
 
Ammo7's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2ss/rs RJT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Duluth Ga 30097
Posts: 399
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikesZ View Post
IMO this is a good choice by GM to add the backup sensors. Many people have requested this feature in multiple threads on this website. It is great that GM is listening.
I agree better to have a couple of dots then a scratched/banged up bumper
__________________
2SS RJT sun roof RS package Auto.
Order Detail # NMMXX3.
Order date- 07/21/2009
2000, Order accepted by GM0-8/11/09
3000, Order accepted by production control 8/12/2009 TPW 09/07/2009
3300, Order scheduled for production 08/25/09
3800, Order produced 09/12/09 2G1FK1EJ6A9145958
4200, shipped 09/14/09
5000 vehicle at dealer 09/28/09
6000 vehicle delivered to customer 09/28/09
Ammo7 is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Product! 2010 Camaro Rear Trunk Panel Blackout Kit! RPI Designs Exterior Parts & Accessories 23 09-09-2016 10:04 AM
Camaro Laws ChevyNut Off-topic Discussions 102 06-06-2011 10:34 PM
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 07:33 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 07:05 PM
Abu Dhabi Hosts 2010 Chevrolet Camaro Regional Premiere camaro5 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 4 11-28-2008 06:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.