![]() |
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics Camaro ZL1 specific topics |
| View Poll Results: What do you prefer in your Z/28? | |||
| TT V6, 450 HP, -150 lbs than SS, $40,000. |
|
25 | 17.24% |
| DI V8, 450 HP, same weight as SS, $40,000. |
|
27 | 18.62% |
| LSA, 550 HP, + 150 lbs than SS, $46,000. |
|
93 | 64.14% |
| Voters: 145. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
It Will Be Mine
Drives: A 2014 Z28 or a C7? Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Road
Posts: 4,385
|
I just had to.................................
Understand the braking, handling, cosmetics, etc. would be the same.
For those wanting more power consider the upgradability of each offering, not I want an LS9 or an LS7. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Camaro➎ moderator
|
that is......?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator, USN
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
It Will Be Mine
Drives: A 2014 Z28 or a C7? Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Road
Posts: 4,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Camaro➎ moderator
|
FYI a DI V8 wouldn't need as much diplacement to make the same power. Therefore, making it smaller and lowering weight.
So try a lighter weight 5.5L DI V8 pushing right over 450-460HP at the crank. Not that I know anything..... Just saying.....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator, USN
|
Now that there's a poll, can we edit it? Prices aren't necessary to determine interest or preference in any of these products.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
It Will Be Mine
Drives: A 2014 Z28 or a C7? Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Road
Posts: 4,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
It Will Be Mine
Drives: A 2014 Z28 or a C7? Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Road
Posts: 4,385
|
Quote:
Any weight difference would be nill. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
juggernaut
|
a DI v8 at 6.2 liters would surely be over 500 hp. especially if 5.5l is pushing 470 in the GT2 class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm still wondering why people are even wanting a a 500 HP motor. The only thing that is going to compete with the GT500, which we all know will be it's main competition, would be an LSA. Unless they perform some sort of miracle and get 570 HP+ out of TTV6 set-up, the only thing that will be able to reach that sort of HP, at a reasonable cost, would be an LSA. A 450 HP DI would barely be a HP increase at all from the SS...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
Quote:
I'd LOVE to have the LSA. LOVE IT. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Drives a Maro
|
a simple tune could get you the DI V8 with an SS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
I like the LSA...in fact, I love it...everything about it is perfection to me...
BUT -- I would buy the SS as it is, if it were called the Z/28. (I'd modifiy it to just under 500 hp, and upgrade the suspension, and call it a day). The raw power is not what I'm interested in, its the handling, and the style. If they make the Z/28 with an LSA...I'll have to "live with the extra power"...how ever will I survive? ![]() SO -- I want a DI V8, because I want that amount of power, I want maximum efficiency, and I want that V8 sound....something a TT V6 can never replicate (it can get close, though...) ![]() (I would like to see all of the above in the Camaro lineup, however...but my vision of a Z28 is relatively specific...) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '12 Camaro ZL1 #1255 Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 1,283
|
im down with the LSA. who cars if theres extra weight that comes with it. check out the cts-v and what numbers it pulls off with that motor and it weight north of 4000lbs
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Waiting...
Drives: 2009 G8 GXP M6 Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jamestown NC
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
__________________
SOLD 2009 Maverick Silver G8 GXP M6
Engine Mods: TVS 2300 Magnacharger 6.5lbs, ARH 1 7/8" long tubes with catted x-pipe Roto-Fab Intake, Custom Fuel System, Tuned by Me Drivetrain Mods: Stage 4 Monster Clutch, GForce 300M Race Axles Suspension Mods: Pedders/Wretched basic drag pack - BMR trailing arms and toe rods Misc Mods: Jamesbiz Catch can - GRRRR8 Heater hose relo kit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Petro-sexual
Drives: Ultra-Grin Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 12,951
|
LSA.
I'm still going to ask how much weight a TT V6 setup will save over even a DI 6.2? How much does each turbo weigh? How much are the cooling lines and related components going to weigh? What - it isn't going to be necessary to strengthen the chassis and powertrain? How much torque is this set-up going to put out? Sorry - LSA, IMVHO, is the obvious choice (for me, at least). I think a 500 horse' DI 6.2 would be sweet, but unless it looses another 300 lbs. on top of that, I just don't see a significant justification for that over an LSA. That DI 6.2 isn't going to have the torque the LSA will have and this car needs torque. I don't want to have to wind the 3.6 out to 5K RPMs in order to get some good acceleration. LSA makes great torque down low and great power up top. I think DI is the direction gasoline engines are going to go for maximum efficiency, but I think it's going to be several more years before we see it in Camaro - I think it'll be in Corvette first. LSA
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||||
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
You're thoughts are pretty much in line with mine...with one addition (which ultimately led me to choose the DI V8 over the LSA...)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't think you'll need to rev a turbo V6 from GM in order to get good accel. ![]() hmmm......... |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Group Provocateur
Drives: Long Distances Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,008
|
Would have been nice to see a 450hp DI VVT motor added into the polling mix.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
VVT will most likely be part of the GenV engine lineup...which is what I assumed the OP meant by "DI V8"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 12,061
|
Anybody else suprised the one with the most power is winning??
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Petro-sexual
Drives: Ultra-Grin Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 12,951
|
Quote:
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Group Provocateur
Drives: Long Distances Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,008
|
I voted for the LSA for a Z-28 model...I just think it begs for it. But if they offered what my idea of an RS should be (1LE package)...with a smaller DI VVT motor & handling package...I would opt for that over a Z-28.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
juggernaut
|
hmmm guess the DI info out there isn't enough for people to have a good understanding why it's better. and 6.2L DI will put down north of 500 hp with out breaking a sweat. so who knows why people are stuck on the LSA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
I am the internets.
|
I can't imagine GM putting the new DI V8 in ONLY the Z28. I imagine it'll go in the SS as well, like when the LS1 replaced the LT1.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|