![]() |
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Cosmetics and Lighting Modification Discussions External and Internal cosmetics modifications. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() Drives: CyberGray Camaro Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Paraguay
Posts: 8
|
I don't know about you all, but apart from the fact that the rear air slots aren't cut out, the hood scoop isn't functional and the different bumpers my only real gripe would be the placement of the blinkers shown on the concept and the ones on the production model. The ones on the concept made the fascia look so much badass I think, but bringing them to the inside of the grill well to me the front doesn't look as wide as it used to i.e. I don't like it!..BUT the rest of the vehicle is tits
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Drives: fanboys and ass kissers crazy. Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 6,181
|
I thought the concepts signal lights were nice but I like the production version as well. I'll take either set-up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
|
I'm happy with them.
I'm sure a local shop will cut those slits for you. Make sure they sand and repaint the area to make it look clean.
__________________
![]() If you don't have constructive feedback, then feed your feedback back up your backside. 48:27 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
|
I do believe that those locations are mandated (most likely) by gov't and state law.
You might want to check into it before cutting and removing. If you go through all that work and then can't register/inspect your vehicle, it wouldn't be worth the risk on all the traffic tickets. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Drives: 2002 SS Camaro Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 56
|
Yeah i like the concept blinkers way better...better color and better design...they really stood out
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1987 Porsche 930 Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dawsonville, GA
Posts: 5
|
I'm with you on this one. The original blinker location looked much better IMO. The production placement makes the front end look crowded. If it is a legal issue I would have preferred they placed the blinkers on the corner of the fender as opposed to where they are now. I guess I'll have to get used to it.
I too wish they would have cut out the shark gills on the rear fender. What's the point in having them if they aren't cut out? Aerodynamic drag my butt. More like cost cutting. A 422 HP motor would have no problem dealing with what little drag if any the fender gills would create. Very disappointing. But hey, it is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Account Suspended
|
The blinkers were moved due to them being recessed in the front bumper. You couldn't see them clearly from an angle and the side turn signals are harded to see then the bigger main signal lamps.
They're easier to see from oncoming traffic on the inside of the headlights.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,762
|
Call me crazy, but I like the production light placement better...
![]() It makes the eyes look wider and the blnkers now flow with the bottom bumper better than before.. Looking at the concept now looks cross-eyed to me.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
|
I don't mind them either way. I mean, I like the placement either way. So, moving them is no gripe from me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1987 Porsche 930 Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dawsonville, GA
Posts: 5
|
I'm getting use to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
THE GoldMember
Drives: '92 Pathfinder A.K.A The BEAST Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 1,177
|
Its actually better on the inside. Now theyre out of the way and we get bigger headlights, and they canbe seen. Everybody wins.
__________________
So the Goldmember has spoken, So shall it be done.
_________________________________________________ AUGUST 2009 AURORA HITSS THE SSTREETSS!!!!! ~MY SSCHEME: BLACK W/GOLD BUMPER 2 BUMPER Z-28 SSTRIPESS.~ ^In the wise words of Pink, "NO NOT MUSTANG GOLD" Forget a automatic, a MUSCLE car needs STICK! To bad I'm getting autoQuote:
May The Beast Rest In Peace. For Now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
34.134025, -118.321644
|
I'm gonna miss them, but I understand why they moved...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
They weren't cut out back in the day of the first gens. They aren't cut out now. Big deal. If you dont' want to cut them out, an alternative is getting black vinyl stickers for them. You achieve the look without cutting the body.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() Drives: CyberGray Camaro Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Paraguay
Posts: 8
|
Thanx for the feedback gents
now I do..have to say that after watching the yellow/red v6 RS Camaro driving video on youtube that the front of the car looks if anything way more aggressive now I just have to wait for the second yr of production to come along so I can get it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
5th Gen Camaro Enthusiast
|
Camaro Turn Signals
I must say that I am pleasantly surprised at the execution of the front turn signals in the grill area. it makes total sense. i hadn't realized how nonfunctional the concept signals would have been had they been carried to production. very poor sight if you're looking at the car from an angle...of course at that point you should be able to see the front side marker signals...but I'm actually digging the traditional sig placement over the concept.
anyone else agree? or do you hate the new placement?
__________________
- Brick (yes my real name)
...soon she'll be sitting in my driveway |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Marine Poolie
Drives: 95 civic Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 5,771
|
yep im with
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
More human than human
|
what would be the point of them cut out anyway
cooling the tires off i want them hot and sticky anyway . worrying about stuff like that makes me wanna
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT/RS M6 Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fairhaven, MA
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Account Suspended
|
15? maybe per side. At least if you get the ones made by the same company that make the powered by hondacura ones.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
I don't need no V8
Drives: 07 HHR, 10 CAMARO 1LT! Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,547
|
Quote:
Now the lights. The production were moved probably for two reasons, 1 would be regulations, they HAVE a specific size they need to be to meet govermnemt standards, same with the taillights and side markers lights, that is why you do not see tiny lights or turn signals any more on cars. Another reason is visibility, they need to be able to be seen from a wide angle and with the headlight on, if they were in the concept position more than likely the glare for the headlights at night would obstruct the light from the signal lights.
__________________
QUOTE=fbodfather: "Yes -- the 2010 (3.6 V6) engine is the same as the 2011 - we simply 'certified' the engine ......."
http://www.vsra-usa.com/VSRA_Home_RQ4A.php |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Finally Some Positive CAFE opinions | stovt001 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 37 | 03-07-2008 05:18 AM |
| looking for opinions and best guesses. | joes3rdcamaro82/91/2010 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 3 | 12-04-2007 11:37 PM |
| I've made a new design / look to the site, can I get your opinions? | MarkLS2 | Site Related Announcements / Suggestions / Feedback / Questions | 22 | 07-08-2007 04:12 PM |