Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Gen5DIY
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-18-2008, 10:19 AM   #1
camaro1O
 
Drives: 2002 Z06 Corvette
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: dallas
Posts: 2
2010 Camaro 3.6L

Everyone is talking about the SS, but I just saw the numbers for the 3.6L and its suppose to put out 300 hp and 273 torque. Thats pretty crazy considering what the old LT1's and LS1's put out, its pretty cool how things change sometimes


2010 Camaro
camaro1O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 10:32 AM   #2
Xanthos
Almost-Original Postwhore
 
Xanthos's Avatar
 
Drives: Stick
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 12,566
The 3.6 has been netting a good bit of popularity, believe me. Just head over to the V6 discussion boards.
- Xanthos
__________________
Xanthos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 10:43 AM   #3
TheMadHatter99
Kept the Faith
 
TheMadHatter99's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro 2SS/RS CGM
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 721
/\ +1

And the V6 has even won over a few die-hard V8 enthusiasts (possibly myself included...still undecided).
__________________
TheMadHatter99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 10:48 AM   #4
Georgie

 
Georgie's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro... soon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,217
whats the mpg on the 6 like
Georgie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 10:57 AM   #5
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1LE...Drove: 2012 ZL1
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 27,837
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
27mpg...they estimate 26, though until the EPA does their thing.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - - Read Twice Before You Post.
...Anxiously waiting to order a silver "Z"...

Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 01:27 PM   #6
FenwickHockey65
General Motors Aficionado
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Drives: 2003 GMC Envoy/2007 Ford F-150
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 33,917
Send a message via AIM to FenwickHockey65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
27mpg...they estimate 26, though until the EPA does their thing.
Is 27 MPG with the manual and 26 with the auto?
__________________
FenwickHockey65's GM Thread!

2003 GMC Envoy SLE - Airaid Cold Air Intake, Gibson Performance Catback Exhaust
2007 Ford F-150 XL SuperCab (State-issued)
FenwickHockey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 01:38 PM   #7
rolnslo
Rolling along...
 
rolnslo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS SGM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Is 27 MPG with the manual and 26 with the auto?
It's all an educated guess at the moment until final specs are released.

For comparison, the 2008 Cadillac CTS with the same engine/trans combos:

3.6l DI + 6L50 Automatic: 17city/26hwy
3.6l DI + Aisin AY6 Manual: 16city/25hwy

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx...Field=Findacar
rolnslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 01:25 PM   #8
Doug 97SS
 
Drives: 1997 Camaro SS #1499
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 24
I'd like to add (even though I don't post a lot I do read a lot here)...

I know many of you are concerned (as am I) about gas mileage.

But, when I drove to Indy in 2000 (damn 8years ago!!) with a 6speed and 4.10 gears in my 97 Camaro SS i actually got 30mpg on my way out there from Maryland. A friend who was traveling in his 94 Z28 couldn't understand why his gas mileage was worst because he had 3.42's (he had a 6speed too) that all that up and downshifting killed his gas mileage where for me, the car stayed in 6th gear and I cruised....Just food for thought.

So when you see those numbers I am willing to bet there will be a few of us that WILL get even better then that with the right gear ratio.
Doug 97SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 01:35 PM   #9
rayainsw
 
Drives: G8 GT\Corvette Coupe [ gone ]
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 64
2010 Camaro V6 vs 2009 CTS 300 HP V6

I rented a CTS ( not with the DI 300+ HP version of the V6 ) a few months ago. With the announcement of GM’s Employee Pricing For everyone – and the ( surprising, to me ) inclusion of the 2009 CTS in this promotion – I decided to schedule a quick test drive.

Given that this CTS essentially has the same motor that will be in the base Camaro. . .

And given that the automatic trans. in the CTS is also a 6L50 – same as in the Camaro . . .

And given that the CTS’s final drive ratio is 3.42:1 – a bit more aggressive ( approx. 4.5% ) than the Camaro V6’s 3.27 . . .

And the CTS’s weight is only about 200 #s ( approx. 6% ) more than the announced weight of the Camaro V6 . . .

Well – I truly hope that 200 # weight advantage for the Camaro makes a whole lot more difference than I’d expect in acceleration – or I fear that many will be disappointed in this aspect. The R&T test of a CTS, with performance options but few luxury options, shows 0 – 60 = 6.0 seconds. And the Quarter in 14.5 @ 98.2.

Though I may be somewhat ‘spoiled’ by the Corvette I drive daily, I really was underwhelmed by the 300 HP CTS’s acceleration. ( MSRP was nearly $50K, BTW ) I do not see what these numbers represent as a particularly sporting or sprightly level of acceleration.

The CTS did not feel quick to me, at all . . .

- Ray
Hoping for the best here . . .

Note:
CTS’s Michelin tires = 235/50x18
Camaro V6 = 245/55x18
rayainsw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 01:41 PM   #10
The_Blur
Rock Chalk
 
The_Blur's Avatar
 
Drives: Demon Super Sport
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,687
Send a message via AIM to The_Blur
That V6 is really lucrative. It's definitely no slouch to the competition out there.
The_Blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 02:20 PM   #11
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,057
I think a base car that runs in the 14s is no slouch. As you stated earlier, this power is not far from LS1s even (although, they aren't known to be pretty underrated.) Regardless, my LT1 ran low 14s stock, so I don't think the DI V6 at 300+ horse' running similar times is anything to sneeze at personally. It all comes down to what your preferrences are though
__________________
05 Hummer H2 SUV on OEM Air Ride
Forged 11.1:1 408 LQ4 (K1 crank & rods; Mahle pistons)/CPP LS3 CNC heads/BTR Stage IV LS3 cam and valvetrain/home ported L92 intake manifold/ported 90mm TB/custom Volant CAI/mid-length headers/AFE dual 3" CB/Corvette Servo/el cheapo lift/Cognito UCAs/e'fan conversion/aluminum radiator/Moroso catchcan/HPTuners by me/LED exterior lighting/Pioneer AVH-5600BHS/Pioneer GM-9601/2-Pioneer TS-W310D4/Obcon Labyrinth dual-12 box/lots of other stuff
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 03:31 PM   #12
Txturbo
Keeper of the Faith
 
Txturbo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2001 Z28 Agressively
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rosenberg,Texas
Posts: 1,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayainsw View Post
I rented a CTS ( not with the DI 300+ HP version of the V6 ) a few months ago. With the announcement of GM’s Employee Pricing For everyone – and the ( surprising, to me ) inclusion of the 2009 CTS in this promotion – I decided to schedule a quick test drive.

Given that this CTS essentially has the same motor that will be in the base Camaro. . .

And given that the automatic trans. in the CTS is also a 6L50 – same as in the Camaro . . .

And given that the CTS’s final drive ratio is 3.42:1 – a bit more aggressive ( approx. 4.5% ) than the Camaro V6’s 3.27 . . .

And the CTS’s weight is only about 200 #s ( approx. 6% ) more than the announced weight of the Camaro V6 . . .

Well – I truly hope that 200 # weight advantage for the Camaro makes a whole lot more difference than I’d expect in acceleration – or I fear that many will be disappointed in this aspect. The R&T test of a CTS, with performance options but few luxury options, shows 0 – 60 = 6.0 seconds. And the Quarter in 14.5 @ 98.2.

Though I may be somewhat ‘spoiled’ by the Corvette I drive daily, I really was underwhelmed by the 300 HP CTS’s acceleration. ( MSRP was nearly $50K, BTW ) I do not see what these numbers represent as a particularly sporting or sprightly level of acceleration.

The CTS did not feel quick to me, at all . . .

- Ray
Hoping for the best here . . .

Note:
CTS’s Michelin tires = 235/50x18
Camaro V6 = 245/55x18
200#s more weight and 40hp less in a luxury car. I'm sure its going to accelerate faster than the CTS you drove. I'm sure the shift points and firmness will make it quicker feeling. Quiet and smooth never feels fast even if it is.
__________________

2010 Camaro SS R6P
2001 Camaro Z28
1969 Camaro SS clone

Txturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 04:06 PM   #13
JEFF2010SSMANUAL
JEFF2010SSMANUAL
 
JEFF2010SSMANUAL's Avatar
 
Drives: IOM 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 1,953
The V6 Camaro will run 0-60 6.0 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 14.5 at best.
JEFF2010SSMANUAL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 04:27 PM   #14
Congoman775

 
Congoman775's Avatar
 
Drives: Muscle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEFF2010SSMANUAL View Post
The V6 Camaro will run 0-60 6.0 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 14.5 at best.
Wrong.


The CTS does 0-60 in 5.7 and the Camaro is lighter/sportier than the CTS

look for the 0-60 to be 5.5 and 1/4 in 14.1
Congoman775 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro Laws ChevyNut Off-topic Discussions 102 06-06-2011 10:34 PM
FINAL Production 2010/2009 Camaro! (PICS) rray200 Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 799 05-19-2011 11:48 PM
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 07:33 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 07:05 PM
2010 Camaro Engine Line-Up Guess camaro5 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 75 04-11-2008 02:25 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.