Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
RDP Motorsport
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions

5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions General 5th generation Camaro topics not covered by other subforums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2008, 01:26 PM   #26
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,128
I think it was not a bad review. It said the car would beat the other 2 competing v6 builds. As far as the price. I think 25k is gonna be with RS.

Don't forget the automatic is gonna be 1000-2000 upgrade. So a base LS with manual and the recreate 78 steel wheels could be as low as 20k.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 01:46 PM   #27
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 25,266
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vash View Post
I think it was not a bad review. It said the car would beat the other 2 competing v6 builds. As far as the price. I think 25k is gonna be with RS.

Don't forget the automatic is gonna be 1000-2000 upgrade. So a base LS with manual and the recreate 78 steel wheels could be as low as 20k.
Not necessarily. The automatic could...I stress that word: could...be standard with the manual being a no-cost option. With so many people opting for automatics nowadays (especially in the majority-sales car), I can see it being standard....
__________________
"Keep the faith." - - Read Before You Post.

Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:01 PM   #28
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,128
Well it's a TH and a 6 speed with electronic shift $$$. They are big and cost a lot more than the simple smaller manual gearboxes. GM has been charging optional for the auto for a long time. You could be right.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:03 PM   #29
pinkcamaro10


 
pinkcamaro10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,747
Send a message via MSN to pinkcamaro10 Send a message via Yahoo to pinkcamaro10
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323 View Post
If you cant take a mullet joke than that might be the problem..... lol jk
no what i can't take is the misinformation.
__________________

3000 3/26
3300:4/30
3400:5/7
3800:5/14 2G1FC1EV1A9110079
4104:5/20
4200:5/30
delivered: 6/9/2009
pinkcamaro10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:04 PM   #30
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,128
Time to watch Joe Dirt again.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:17 PM   #31
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkcamaro10 View Post
no what i can't take is the misinformation.
what was the misinformation I breezed through the article. Are you talking about the price? I would assume they would know what it would be around, or not lol.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:22 PM   #32
GTAHVIT
One Lucky Guy.
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: #22 Tom Henry Racing 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,317
Stay on topic please.
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:24 PM   #33
pinkcamaro10


 
pinkcamaro10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,747
Send a message via MSN to pinkcamaro10 Send a message via Yahoo to pinkcamaro10
im not really sure what is off topic, we're talking about the article, it's not like we're talking about ice cream.
__________________

3000 3/26
3300:4/30
3400:5/7
3800:5/14 2G1FC1EV1A9110079
4104:5/20
4200:5/30
delivered: 6/9/2009
pinkcamaro10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:25 PM   #34
seattlecamaroboy
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS RS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003 View Post
I don't think it would be asking too much to have it priced right between a base and a Mustang GT. I mean, you'll be getting close to the same acceleration, and I'm sure better handling, hands-down. That's only the performance end, as I'm sure ergonimically, it will be superior also. Now, is that a reasonable price to those in the market, maybe not. I'll have to really represent itself well, IMHO. I'm confident GM won't shoot themselves in the foot though.
Same acceleration? LOL The GT does 0 to 60 in 5.1 seconds. That's not the same acceleration. That's 1 second slower, if 6 seconds as advertised.
seattlecamaroboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:28 PM   #35
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,128
Sorry the Joe Dirt Comment was from the mullet reference in said article. I was one of them so I lived it.. (redneck with a 78 and doors that would not open).

Anyway it looks like another positive article. I love those 18 Alum IROC style wheels. Looks like a caliper paint kit would be a nice low cost complement to them. Also we see a picture of the Automatic shifter.. drool. Well I have a bad back (disks) so I need auto.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:40 PM   #36
BowtieGuy
Enlightened
 
BowtieGuy's Avatar
 
Drives: Nothing Currently
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkcamaro10 View Post
I love how they made it sound like the Iroc was the only camaro with t-tops. lol

I hate the stereotype of mullets and stupid redneck crap with camaros. Its just dumb, they need to get over it. It is not 1980 anymore.
I'm glad someone saw it the way I did.
__________________
If you believe it is your right to speak freely no matter the content, relevance, or intelligence of statement, then it is my duty to the powers that be to set you straight.

People have to talk about something just to keep their voice boxes in working order. So they'll have good voice boxes in case there's ever anything really meaningful to say.
Kurt Vonnegut
BowtieGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:41 PM   #37
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 12,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlecamaroboy View Post
Same acceleration? LOL The GT does 0 to 60 in 5.1 seconds. That's not the same acceleration. That's 1 second slower, if 6 seconds as advertised.
Well, if we are going to squable over semantics, I did say close, and if you've even stood next to two cars racing at the track, one second isn't too big a spread. If I remember correctly, GM also stated that they are confident they can get a couple more tenths out of the car before final numbers are released, but I digress.
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:42 PM   #38
EZ28
 
EZ28's Avatar
 
Drives: Hopefully a Camaro soon! ;-)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 67
My second post I think, but you've got to take the pricing with a grain of salt. Motor Trend is about to test drive and write a review about the same prototype V6 and said it will be in the low to mid $20K range. So who's to say what the price will be until we here it from horses (GM's) mouth.

http://www.motortrend.com/features/a...res/index.html

I hope to buy an SS later next year.
EZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:45 PM   #39
dayvedayve
 
Drives: 2006 Chevy Avalanche
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gulf Coast of Texas
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vash View Post
Time to watch Joe Dirt again.
Tisk Tisk now Joe was a Hemi fanboy
dayvedayve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:46 PM   #40
EZ28
 
EZ28's Avatar
 
Drives: Hopefully a Camaro soon! ;-)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 67
Read the last paragraph of the Motor Trend Thread.

"Pictured above is a shot of the V-6 Camaro with its two bogies -- the Dodge Challenger SRT8 and Ford Mustang GT, along with shots of the V-8-powered RS model below."

That's got to be a miss print. The shots look like the RS V6. Will the RS/SS be missing the mail slot?
EZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:49 PM   #41
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 12,949
I think the RS/SS will have the mail slot, and that you're right in noticing their error.
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:50 PM   #42
EZ28
 
EZ28's Avatar
 
Drives: Hopefully a Camaro soon! ;-)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 67
Very cool. I knew it had to be a miss print.
EZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:50 PM   #43
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by dayvedayve View Post
Tisk Tisk now Joe was a Hemi fanboy
hehe....
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:53 PM   #44
Lucas718
 
Drives: Jeep Wrangler
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkcamaro10 View Post
I love how they made it sound like the Iroc was the only camaro with t-tops. lol

I hate the stereotype of mullets and stupid redneck crap with camaros. Its just dumb, they need to get over it. It is not 1980 anymore.
I was thinking the same thing when I read that article. I'm getting a little tired of nearly every article portraying Camaro owners as mullet-headed rednecks. That stereotype just doesn't fit anymore.
Lucas718 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:12 PM   #45
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,128
lol yea I guess it's not the best comparison. But it's more of a generational thing. I think if it as a good thing (Camaro lore).
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:24 PM   #46
scorpio
 
scorpio's Avatar
 
Drives: E46 BMW
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car and Driver
Around the 10Best loop, the Camaro showed remarkable poise, with the suspension handling the pockmarked roads with hardly any disturbance to the cabin.
This concerns me a little. I have a difficult time believing that a suspension setup can be performance oriented and provide good feedback to the driver and at the same time handle a 'pockmarked' road with 'hardly any disturbance'.

Don't get me wrong, the Camaro is no all-out sports car, I am not looking for a super-stiff suspension, but even a 'compromise' setup like the stock sport suspension on a BMW 3 series or Z-4 (non-M) will give you feedback about imperfections in the road in a way that I would not describe as 'hardly any disturbance'.
scorpio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:32 PM   #47
BowtieGuy
Enlightened
 
BowtieGuy's Avatar
 
Drives: Nothing Currently
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio View Post
This concerns me a little. I have a difficult time believing that a suspension setup can be performance oriented and provide good feedback to the driver and at the same time handle a 'pockmarked' road with 'hardly any disturbance'.

Don't get me wrong, the Camaro is no all-out sports car, I am not looking for a super-stiff suspension, but even a 'compromise' setup like the stock sport suspension on a BMW 3 series or Z-4 (non-M) will give you feedback about imperfections in the road in a way that I would not describe as 'hardly any disturbance'.
It's Car and Driver man, they don't know what they're talking about. They probably couldn't give you the definition of "road feel". Or, they meant they felt it though the steering wheel and pedals (responsiveness) but not in the seat (cabin disturbance).
__________________
If you believe it is your right to speak freely no matter the content, relevance, or intelligence of statement, then it is my duty to the powers that be to set you straight.

People have to talk about something just to keep their voice boxes in working order. So they'll have good voice boxes in case there's ever anything really meaningful to say.
Kurt Vonnegut
BowtieGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:35 PM   #48
GTAHVIT
One Lucky Guy.
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: #22 Tom Henry Racing 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio View Post
This concerns me a little. I have a difficult time believing that a suspension setup can be performance oriented and provide good feedback to the driver and at the same time handle a 'pockmarked' road with 'hardly any disturbance'.

Don't get me wrong, the Camaro is no all-out sports car, I am not looking for a super-stiff suspension, but even a 'compromise' setup like the stock sport suspension on a BMW 3 series or Z-4 (non-M) will give you feedback about imperfections in the road in a way that I would not describe as 'hardly any disturbance'.
I undersand your concern. But, their description of the road is up for grabs. Who knows what they mean by pockmarked. It might be as bad a pot holes or just cracks in the pavement. I think all of this is still real subjective. To even talk about suspesion feel is subjective, It's like trying to find one color for everyone. We all want something different in a suspension setup.

GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:40 PM   #49
MrGazinya

 
MrGazinya's Avatar
 
Drives: Aggressive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southampton, PA.
Posts: 1,067
Automobilemag.com did a review to. alot better than caranddriver in my opinion.
__________________
Black 2SS RS LS3 Inferno Int. Plastidipped 20's {MODS} KOOKS LT: Borla S-Type: Roto-Fab CAI: Hurst ST.: Diabloed by Jannetty Racing: PFADT Stage 2, Trailing arms, Tie Rods:

MrGazinya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 08:20 PM   #50
GameOver620
 
GameOver620's Avatar
 
Drives: 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockland County, NY
Posts: 179
this probably isn't that important because i plan on purchasing an ss/rs anyway. but i wonder how many people can fit into the back seat comfortably? i'm 6'1'' so i drive with my seat all the way back.
GameOver620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro Slated for Grand-Am KONI Challenge GS Class in 2009. garfin Camaro Motorsports Discussions 8 05-23-2009 12:15 PM
Car And Drive Magazine drummerstevey 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 71 08-07-2008 03:25 PM
Comparison Test, by Proxy: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 AirGoya Chevy Camaro vs... 86 07-24-2008 11:20 AM
KEEP THE FAITH!! shadowed_Stranger 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 25 07-22-2008 11:52 AM
Zeta platform car and driver review (basis for new Camaro and GM cars) 2001ragtop General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 0 11-15-2006 02:25 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.