Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
PFYC
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics

Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics Camaro ZL1 specific topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-21-2010, 06:56 PM   #51
boxmonkeyracing
juggernaut
 
boxmonkeyracing's Avatar
 
Drives: VRSCF, 2011 SS vert
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: kenly, nc
Posts: 3,345
Send a message via AIM to boxmonkeyracing Send a message via Yahoo to boxmonkeyracing
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobby35ny View Post
So we just sit and watch the 2011 Stang get more market share until 2012?
Thats the old GM way of thinking......
I'll BET, that the 2011 sales for the Camaro will suffer because of the 5.0 debut and we had nothing to counter it.
-bobby
guess that's what the vert and the Z-28 will be. . . but you forget about those? I expected the coupe to drop in sales this year no matter what. the initial demand and new factor is wearing off. the gotta have it now croud has purchased or moved on to the so called better stang.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbodfather View Post
We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name.
boxmonkeyracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 07:43 PM   #52
VADER SS L99

 
VADER SS L99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobby35ny View Post
So we just sit and watch the 2011 Stang get more market share until 2012?
Thats the old GM way of thinking......
I'll BET, that the 2011 sales for the Camaro will suffer because of the 5.0 debut and we had nothing to counter it.
-bobby
What are you talking about? The difference between the SS and GT is a drivers race and in 2 test I read about, the SS beat the GT by 2 tenths and 2mph in the quarter. The 6.2 also only gets 1mpg less than the much smaller 5.0 and thats with the SS weighing 300lbs more. The funny thing to me about the Coyote motor with all the R & D they put in it, with all the trick parts it still fell short or maybe right on par with the SS. Dont get me wrong I think its a great motor and makes killer power for its displacement but make no mistake they made it to run away from the SS. The fact is it didnt come close to doing that. The real funny thing is is that they could have made a NA aluminum block DOHC 5.4 that would have done just that and all they would have had to make for it is a intake manifold because the rest of the parts already existed. They also have a SOHC 6.2 in the parts bin that would have done the job. It would have been fun to see what GM would have made to counter it but now that they have seen it they are probably saying "whats the point?"
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009.
VADER SS L99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 08:29 AM   #53
rayhawk

 
rayhawk's Avatar
 
Drives: Trailblazer SS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 849
Quote:
Originally Posted by VADER SS L99 View Post
What are you talking about? The difference between the SS and GT is a drivers race and in 2 test I read about, the SS beat the GT by 2 tenths and 2mph in the quarter. The 6.2 also only gets 1mpg less than the much smaller 5.0 and thats with the SS weighing 300lbs more. The funny thing to me about the Coyote motor with all the R & D they put in it, with all the trick parts it still fell short or maybe right on par with the SS. Dont get me wrong I think its a great motor and makes killer power for its displacement but make no mistake they made it to run away from the SS. The fact is it didnt come close to doing that. The real funny thing is is that they could have made a NA aluminum block DOHC 5.4 that would have done just that and all they would have had to make for it is a intake manifold because the rest of the parts already existed. They also have a SOHC 6.2 in the parts bin that would have done the job. It would have been fun to see what GM would have made to counter it but now that they have seen it they are probably saying "whats the point?"

I feel exactly the same way, I think Ford got so caught up in offering a "5.0" that they dropped the ball. The 5.0 block is already maxxed out displacement wise, so there is no growth potential either from this major redesign. A 5.4 DOHC motor would have been a much better match, and they could have started with a slightly lower output version, then bumped it up in a few years. As it is, they have left very little on the table. I don't know, maybe they can put these 5.0 parts on the 5.4 down the road, and that is their plan for the future. Otherwise, when GM revises the LS3, Ford will need a supercharger AGAIN to compete.
__________________
Hooters, hooters, yum yum yum, hooters, hooters on a girl thats dumb.
-Al Bundy

07 2WD Trailblazer SS, LS1 E-fans, 4" FWI, pcmforless tune
72 VW Beetle, 2275cc, Dual 44 IDF's
rayhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2011 Camaro pricing & information announced! HUD, Synergy Green, V6 rated at 312hp! Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 962 12-27-2011 04:34 AM
Do you want the Z28? ChrisB Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 1616 09-04-2010 11:49 PM
WOW just seen new Caddy, 556hp, will the Z28 get that? Maurdib Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 78 08-20-2010 05:46 PM
motortrend march issue Jer4251 Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 15 02-21-2010 12:10 AM
News on Z28 Monaro Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 37 07-25-2008 07:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.