![]() |
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion Come chat about other cars. |
| View Poll Results: . | |||
| Camaro |
|
0 | 0% |
| Mustang |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#26 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,339
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: V45 Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,274
|
Okay, so here's the article:
I would just like to point out that this is a truck article with ONE sentence about a Mustang. The entire thing is speculation, it doesn't say anything about the 6.2 going into the mustang at all. Soooo let's just wait for Ford to say something instead of getting all excited over nothing, k? "PickupTrucks.com is reporting that by the end of 2010, Ford will alter the three engine options that currently make up the engine choices in the F-150. What is coming in time for the 2011 model year will be a new 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 and a 5.0-liter V8 code-named "Coyote." Subbing the V6 EcoBoost for the V8 is about providing the same power with more efficiency. Said to be the premium engine for light-duty trucks, the direct-injection gas engine will offer something like 400 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque while carrying an EPA rating of "at least 23 miles-per-gallon on the highway." Those power numbers handily beat what you'll get from any of the current engines on offer, even though it's down two cylinders. The "Coyote" 5.0-liter, modular, four-valve V8 will have "huge heads," and will return the same numbers as the V6: 400 hp and 400 lb-ft. This engine will become the standard F-150 lump, returning the same gas mileage as the current 5.4-liter but with much more power. This same engine will also reportedly find its way into the Mustang. That will leave the 6.2-liter V8 (the Boss) slated for the Raptor later this year as last engine choice (unless there's a 4-cylinder EcoBoost added in 2013), and it will go into special edition F-150s and the Super Duty trucks." I bolded the one sentence about the Mustang. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,398
|
why would chevy be spooked?
Ford wont build a mustang with more power/quality for less $$ . The GT500 is evidence of that.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Petro-sexual
Drives: Ultra-Grin Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 12,949
|
Let's, please, play nice
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Apprehensive Optimist
Drives: '10 SS/RS SIM Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: JAX
Posts: 1,389
|
Ford Responds...
Wonder if it will make its way up to 427 hp....
![]() It appears that the 'shot over the bow' with the Camaro is drawing a response...let the HP wars continue! http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/20/r...ng-also-get-e/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Reality Check Specialist
|
well thank God Ford is finally going to have some competition
__________________
got tequila?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Drives: Like a bat outta hell Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 25
|
I look forward to eating ponies, no matter what they improve!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
merged threads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 95 civic Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 5,809
|
well IMO if ford puts a better engine in the mustang then GM will put a better engine in it and repeat
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() Drives: BLACK ON BLACK 2012 CAMARO SS Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LOS ANGELES, CA
Posts: 743
|
This will be interesting. Like I said in that last epic thread about the mythical 5.0/400HP Mustang... I just don't see it happening. I don't claim to know the costs of these engines, and I'm sure the economies of scale will definitely be in play being that the motor will be shared by the #1 selling vehicle in the world (F-150), but I can't for the life of me see how Ford can put the Coyote in the Mustang withot raising the price to be at least EQUAL to the Camaro's. And that just goes against their business model for that car... as far as the Mustang is concerned Ford's always made 'em cheap and left it to their buyers to make 'em fast. Maybe Ford is spooked enough to finally drop the knife and bring a gun to the gunfight but, man, I just don't see it... not for a few years at least.
__________________
BLACK CAR + FLAT BLACK STRIPES + BLACK WHEELS = BLK PW3R!!
![]() ![]() ****Thanks to Silver Streak for the pic I used to make this sig**** |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() Drives: BLACK ON BLACK 2012 CAMARO SS Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LOS ANGELES, CA
Posts: 743
|
Hmmm... this seems to be a bit more credible
http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-for...re-50l-v8.html Aww well... faster Mustangs just means more mods for my Camaro... yipee!!!
__________________
BLACK CAR + FLAT BLACK STRIPES + BLACK WHEELS = BLK PW3R!!
![]() ![]() ****Thanks to Silver Streak for the pic I used to make this sig**** |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,759
|
By announcing so early a new engine that is more powerful, it will hurt the sales of this years GT.
__________________
Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Camaro➎ moderator
|
Quote:
The article is for the 2011 Mustang. We already know what will be in the 2010. I don't know about GM putting a "better" engine but maybe adding more horsepower to the LS3. Either way I doubt GM will let the Camaro go down without a fight. I doubt it. The Mustang is a big seller no matter what.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
![]() Drives: 07 Mustang Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() Drives: had a goat Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,398
|
Quote:
This might be just what we need, thanks Ford for potentially waking the Z28 from its slumber.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
how could a v6 make 400 hp there is no way it could make 400 hp and absoultly no way it will have 400 pounds of torque
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,398
|
The GTR has a V6 that makes 480+hp. its not impossible.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
![]() Drives: The Larkvillemobile Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver Suburbs
Posts: 188
|
These engines would be going into the newest body style Mustangs, correct? This isn't about some 2015 MY or anything...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,398
|
2011
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
![]() Drives: the passenger seat Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: awesometown,tn
Posts: 371
|
Not at all. Ford will never win a hp war with gm, mainly because of the reason that there are 3 more motors that are not going ( or haven't ) been put in the camaro, which are alot more powerful then the regular LS3 or L99. ( LS7, LSA, LS9 ). 505, 556, 638. But hey, the camaro deserves a little competition! ![]() oh yeah almost forgot, the cts-v is priced in the low 60's and is a cadillac. that tell you anything about how much a camaro that would match the gt500's (45-$60,000) performance would cost?
__________________
Ponycrusher 21 ![]() Last edited by ponycrusher21; 01-20-2009 at 05:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
![]() Drives: the passenger seat Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: awesometown,tn
Posts: 371
|
the GTR'S motor is hand built and comes wrapped up in an $80,000 package.
anyways, here is what i think about ford putting a 400 hp/400 tq V6 in the mustang: reality
__________________
Ponycrusher 21 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | ||
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 Join Date: May 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,237
|
Quote:
I'm looking forward to this interesting development. It looks like Ford doesn't want to give the top spot to the Camaro after all. As I've said many times, competition benefits all of us no matter what your brand preference is. Quote:
__________________
All statements made in this post are undoubtedly correct and are eligible neither for debate nor discussion. If any comment is made that seemingly contradicts a comment made earlier, it simply means I was correct before and am even more correct now.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
![]() Drives: the passenger seat Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: awesometown,tn
Posts: 371
|
Quote:
You see, comparing a car that starts at 43 grand with one that starts at around 31 makes no sense to me. GM doesn't have the money right now. That doesn't mean they aren't capable. its kind of like kick boxing against a guy with a peg leg that's missing his arm and is in a wheelchair.
__________________
Ponycrusher 21 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread | Beau Tie | Chevy Camaro vs... | 3644 | 03-09-2012 07:45 PM |
| Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? | 5thGenOwner | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 111 | 12-06-2011 10:06 AM |
| Official 2011 Mustang GT info released | nester7929 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 81 | 12-28-2009 03:13 PM |