Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Jason 98 TA
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-06-2007, 10:44 PM   #18
cannondalerider
LSWEE
 
cannondalerider's Avatar
 
Drives: CGM LS3 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 85
Concept With Windows Down (One Up)

Very nice! How much?
cannondalerider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 05:00 AM   #19
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,556
Ok. I take back what I said about not at all liking the pic of the back window up. I does not look bad. BUT... I agree about it not helping the lines. The coupe was shown with windows down.

One of the reasons I had heard why GM might make the rear window fixed is because they had a lot of wear on the rubber material at the edge of the window from regular up and down usage. I was told they wanted it to roll down, but couldn't figure out how to prevent the damage to the rubber material. I'm sure w/ a few guys putting their brains together, they could figure it out. And, weight is not increased that much by adding either a motor or handle and the window track. This Camaro is MUCH more appealing w/ the complete open sides.
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 09:48 AM   #20
Al Robinson
RACKM
 
Drives: 2001 Mazda MilleniaS
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 160
Didn't mean to start anything, I was just curious. I personally would like to see them down. We have the means. We have the technology. I see the mercedez CLK and the CL and it look great as a true coupe.
Al Robinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 11:11 AM   #21
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 26,450
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Robinson View Post
Didn't mean to start anything, I was just curious. I personally would like to see them down. We have the means. We have the technology. I see the mercedez CLK and the CL and it look great as a true coupe.
Either way, it's a true coupe. It's just a difference in presentation
__________________
"Keep the faith." - - Read Before You Post.

Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 11:21 AM   #22
cantseeme
fireman
 
cantseeme's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 monte carlo SS
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: miami, fl
Posts: 17
i highly doubt that happening not enough room more price value and weight difficulties
__________________
cantseeme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 12:25 PM   #23
Bart
 
Bart's Avatar
 
Drives: 1997 Trans Am
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 97
I want a true coupe, and to me that means they need to roll down. And lets say they are fixed. What in the world are they going to do with the convertible? Will the rear seat passengers have no window at all? Given the lines of this car, I think the convertible needs to have the rear windows as well, and if thats the case, they have to go down. I think a closer inspection of the convertible might help in answering this question.
__________________
-Bart
1997 Pontiac Trans Am
2004 Harley Davidson Softail Deuce
2009 Chevrolet Corvette Z06
Bart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 01:10 PM   #24
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,556
Anyone think about the B pillar when it comes to crash tests and ratings? In order to have a 5 star crash rating, it has to be built right from the beginning. GM doesn't want to have to have that pillar either, but if it means getting less than a 5 star crash rating, many insurance companies won't insure the Camaro. Yes, unfortunately weight plays an issue as well. Apparently, Dodge is dealing with these very issues right now.

And check this out..... "There IS a way to have a B-pillar that isn't recognizable from the outside of the car." ... notice the quotes...
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 03:20 PM   #25
c00l usmc
 
c00l usmc's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Camaro, 1985 Z28 Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hawaii & Maryland
Posts: 37
I hope the rear windows roll down, that would suck for the guy sitting in the back.
c00l usmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 03:34 PM   #26
EllwynX


 
EllwynX's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 2,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAG UR IT View Post
Ok. I take back what I said about not at all liking the pic of the back window up. I does not look bad. BUT... I agree about it not helping the lines. The coupe was shown with windows down.

One of the reasons I had heard why GM might make the rear window fixed is because they had a lot of wear on the rubber material at the edge of the window from regular up and down usage. I was told they wanted it to roll down, but couldn't figure out how to prevent the damage to the rubber material. I'm sure w/ a few guys putting their brains together, they could figure it out. And, weight is not increased that much by adding either a motor or handle and the window track. This Camaro is MUCH more appealing w/ the complete open sides.
I actually noticed the extreme wear on the rubber on the back window while at the Philly Auto Show. If they can't reduce that wear, I can see them being fixed.

I'm not against rolldown windows. I actually prefer they roll down. But TTops AND rolldown windows would be even better. LOL
EllwynX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 03:37 AM   #27
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by EllwynX View Post
I actually noticed the extreme wear on the rubber on the back window while at the Philly Auto Show. If they can't reduce that wear, I can see them being fixed.

I'm not against rolldown windows. I actually prefer they roll down. But TTops AND rolldown windows would be even better. LOL
I saw the wear too. It was pretty bad. They didn't want to roll down the windows because it was getting so bad that they didn't want to damage it more. Why not make it a metal edge on front to protect the rubber side which would house the front window track? That way, they metal would house the rubber which is being damaged. Metal might not look so great, but it could be pained black...or even made of a hard plastic material. It would not be damaged at all if it was made of a hard plastic material like on the wifes Kia.

I would love to see electric rear windows. Basically, you roll down the front windows completely and then by continuing to hold down the button, the rear windows begin to roll down. That would work fine by me. Hell...if I have to, I'll pay extra.

HOWEVER, I would not be opposed ONE SINGLE BIT to having a manual roll down rear window.
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 08:23 AM   #28
Moose
Moderator
 
Moose's Avatar
 
Drives: '99 Camaro SS #1392
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Newtown, Pa.
Posts: 3,982
Giving it more thought, if I had a choice, I'd prefer that the rear window be functional.

But, if it isn't, it's not really a "big deal" to me. I'm more excited over having an AWESOME looking car, and that that car is a Camaro, which not too long ago, was a "thing of the past".

From where I'll be sitting, which is in the drivers seat, I'll be too busy enjoying the car with a HUGE GRIN on my face to be concerned about the rear window.

What's the saying, "Outta sight, outta mind"
Moose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 08:27 AM   #29
35th02ss

 
35th02ss's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 SS
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wallops Island, VA
Posts: 758
Well here is a thought everyone. You forgot about the vert. The rear windows in the vert are going to have to roll down. No question about it.
35th02ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 08:34 AM   #30
Moose
Moderator
 
Moose's Avatar
 
Drives: '99 Camaro SS #1392
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Newtown, Pa.
Posts: 3,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by 35th02ss View Post
Well here is a thought everyone. You forgot about the vert. The rear windows in the vert are going to have to roll down. No question about it.
GREAT point! hmm..........
Moose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 10:34 AM   #31
2001ragtop

 
2001ragtop's Avatar
 
Drives: V8 american car
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,417
Quote:
Originally Posted by 35th02ss View Post
Well here is a thought everyone. You forgot about the vert. The rear windows in the vert are going to have to roll down. No question about it.
I was going to say the same thing.

Also, I am sure people would revolt that for the high price tag, the window doesn't come down.

Last edited by 2001ragtop; 05-08-2007 at 10:47 AM.
2001ragtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 03:02 PM   #32
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,556
The rear windows on the convertable will roll down. Convertibles receive a waiver in the crash testing scores. There won't be a problem w/ that. But, the coupe is another story...they want a B-pillar for the crash test rating (which makes absolutely no freaking sense to me seeing as though the vert does not need a rating......it can just crumple like a tin can). This is just kind of a let down for me. I want the full "open air" experience.
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 06:27 PM   #33
ChevyNut
 
ChevyNut's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Black on Black
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 314
you could take a hammer and bust it out, however it may be hard to roll it up later. jk I dont care either way i just want one now!!
ChevyNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 08:47 PM   #34
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,556
Yeah........thinkin about it.

That back window will most likely be fixed. This SUCKS. I wonder how difficult it would be to fix them to roll down....seriously. Shoot...probably cost a cool grand in body work, fabricating parts, etc.

TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Exclusive: Q&A with the Fbodfather (from 8/8/06) KILLER74Z28 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 19 03-27-2009 12:08 PM
windows vista!!!! jbynum69 Off-topic Discussions 13 02-22-2007 08:14 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.