Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Haddad Motorsports
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8

Forced Induction - V8 V8 Supercharger, turbo, nitrous discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2010, 09:34 PM   #1
coolhand5599
 
Drives: CTS
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tampa
Posts: 38
Turbo Vs. Supercharger

Lets start some trouble. What is better Turbo or Supercharger?
And why? I have to admit I have driver a TAFC but I have never had a turbo or blown street car. I will be doing one or the other but i would to see some debate. What would be the hardest on the car?
coolhand5599 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:03 PM   #2
MileMAN402
RIP JoePa
 
MileMAN402's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS & 2001 Audi S4
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central PA
Posts: 636
put this thread in the Super/turbo forum...

but anyways...

a turbo or TT setup will make more boost at lower rpms which will put more strain on the engine there but they will typically make more hp/tq with an overall lower amount of boost

i would want a TT setup on my car but they are usually a lot more $$ too
__________________
MileMAN402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:09 PM   #3
speedster
SST...
 
speedster's Avatar
 
Drives: SST Camaro 2010
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 6,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhand5599 View Post
Lets start some trouble. What is better Turbo or Supercharger?
And why? I have to admit I have driver a TAFC but I have never had a turbo or blown street car. I will be doing one or the other but i would to see some debate. What would be the hardest on the car?
Please use the search function. There are tons of threads on this topic...
__________________
speedster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:12 PM   #4
PQ
Drives a Maro
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: Hybrid SS Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 35,539
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
What is boost?















PQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:18 PM   #5
KungFuHamster
 
KungFuHamster's Avatar
 
Drives: Grabber Blue Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhand5599 View Post
Lets start some trouble. What is better Turbo or Supercharger?
And why? I have to admit I have driver a TAFC but I have never had a turbo or blown street car. I will be doing one or the other but i would to see some debate. What would be the hardest on the car?
both will be hard on the car.


the simplest and best answer is...it depends. but a turbo is the best power adder. its free horsepower and it makes the most hp per lb of boost.

a turbo is exhaust driven. a blower is belt driven. the turbo will require more plumbing, thus is usually more difficult to install. tuning can (not always) be a little more troublesome as well.

a good positive displacement blower like a kenne bell or whipple would be a good thing on these cars due to the weight...that being said, a properly sized turbo can easily meet or exceed the torque production of a PD blower too.

so how much do you want to spend...thats the real question.
KungFuHamster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:21 PM   #6
LittleMT
user bann'd
 
LittleMT's Avatar
 
Drives: Chevy SS
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hepcat City
Posts: 1,442
I can't say one is better then the other, but I am a turbo person.....
__________________

Chantilly Lace, the 2011 Rockabilly Jukebox..ADM built..617rwhp, geared A6.
LittleMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:26 PM   #7
axis


 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 4,516
Go into the proper forum section and READ.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech Yellowjacket fed
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
JRE tuned

Aint nobody got time for that
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:40 PM   #8
coolhand5599
 
Drives: CTS
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tampa
Posts: 38
I would like to spend no more than 10k. Will that get it done?
coolhand5599 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:42 PM   #9
KungFuHamster
 
KungFuHamster's Avatar
 
Drives: Grabber Blue Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhand5599 View Post
I would like to spend no more than 10k. Will that get it done?
id advise looking into the forced induction section. as a mustang guy, i dont have a clue to how much parts are for these cars...though what little ive seen its expensive.

remember when you go forced induction its a good idea to get colder plugs, bigger injectors/fuel pump and a QUALITY custom tune.
KungFuHamster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 11:12 PM   #10
blake-b

 
blake-b's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2010 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhand5599 View Post
I would like to spend no more than 10k. Will that get it done?
The latest twin turbo systems out all come out to around 10k, give a take a few hundred, when you add in the upgrades. There are numerous vendors in the vendor marketplace with their TT setups for sale...
blake-b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 02:17 AM   #11
mikeSS


 
mikeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,291
i would like a supercharger set to a low psi for safer on engine and .. a nice everyday driving car... and superchargers are easier all around.. but turbos are for big numbers
mikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 02:14 PM   #12
MaroSS
VIN - 7314
 
MaroSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Harbor City, CA
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhand5599 View Post
I would like to spend no more than 10k. Will that get it done?
Maggie is 6-7k depending on install
Vortech is 6-8k depending on type and install
Kenne Bell is 6-10k depending on IC or LC (Intercooler or Liquid Cool)
T/TT setups cost around 8-10k depending on setup and install. Goodluck!
__________________
MaroSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 03:56 PM   #13
axis


 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 4,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeSS View Post
i would like a supercharger set to a low psi for safer on engine and .. a nice everyday driving car... and superchargers are easier all around.. but turbos are for big numbers
That would be a false statement. PD SC's are harder on the engine than a turbo or Procharger. Insta-tq is nice for roasting tires but it's harder on the engine and drivetrain. This is assuming similar HP outputs. The good thing about turbo's is that you can change boost pressure with a turn of a knob or button on a EBC.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech Yellowjacket fed
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
JRE tuned

Aint nobody got time for that
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 04:02 PM   #14
BADNESS
 
BADNESS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 98
Depends what you want out of your car. Twin screw blowers offer nearly instant boost at any rpm the second u mash the throttle. And single turbo set ups usually build power up higher in the rpm range. Twin turbo set ups though offer strong boost from low rpm ranges and then some.
BADNESS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 04:39 PM   #15
CAI Inc
1
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 121
Superchargers take 30-40% of power to turn. A supercharged car producing 500 rwhp is putting roughly the same load on the bottom end as a turbo making 675 rwhp.
CAI Inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 04:40 PM   #16
toehead93

 
Drives: 2010 SS, 1993 Z28
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: wpb fl
Posts: 2,025
The torque curve of a twin screw supercharger is pretty flat and make lots of torque down low. Procharger types make less low end power but equal top end power. As posted abve a single turbo has less lowend compared to a twin turbo setup. However I'm not familiar enough to compare a twin turbo's bottom end power to a twin screw supdercharger. It does appear that the TT will make more power per pound of boost.
__________________
2SS A6 Black
360 RWHP/382 FTLBS - tune only
Mods on: Dynatech LTs, Vararam Intake, Pedders Xa's, DiabloSport tuned
toehead93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 04:51 PM   #17
maxpower5
 
maxpower5's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: peoria, il
Posts: 425
as stated in a couple of responses - i would go with a procharger - around $7200 for the kit. you'd add 175 hp at the crank i believe.

ive researched kenne belle and whipple twin screw - although both are top of the line, you'll pay for it too. procharger still adds more hp an torque than any supercharger or single turbo.

good luck!
maxpower5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 10:30 PM   #18
axis


 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 4,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxpower5 View Post
procharger still adds more hp an torque than any supercharger or single turbo.

good luck!
Are you sure about that? You might want to do a little more research on this statement.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech Yellowjacket fed
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
JRE tuned

Aint nobody got time for that
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 10:32 PM   #19
mikeSS


 
mikeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis View Post
That would be a false statement. PD SC's are harder on the engine than a turbo or Procharger. Insta-tq is nice for roasting tires but it's harder on the engine and drivetrain. This is assuming similar HP outputs. The good thing about turbo's is that you can change boost pressure with a turn of a knob or button on a EBC.
when i said over all easier. i meant installation and maintenances. but ya turbos are better for the engine.
mikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 02:14 AM   #20
phenixdragon

 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 781
One thing to also look at is a lot of supercharges now don't push out very much PSI when you aren't stomping on the gas. Such as the new Whipple I think is rated at only 5% power when you are just cruising.
phenixdragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 05:42 AM   #21
maxpower5
 
maxpower5's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: peoria, il
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis View Post
Are you sure about that? You might want to do a little more research on this statement.
i dont post unless im sure
maxpower5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 09:08 AM   #22
robertway

 
robertway's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Challenger SRT8 Auto
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAI Inc View Post
Superchargers take 30-40% of power to turn. A supercharged car producing 500 rwhp is putting roughly the same load on the bottom end as a turbo making 675 rwhp.
This statement has got me thinking. My main concern with introducing Forced Induction is a setup that gives me the most power at the same time the best chance the engine will last a really long time. I had kinda settled on a Centri with Meth Injection but have been researching Twin Turbos more and more and a statement like that seems to speak to the efficiency advantages Turbos apparently have.

Too many choices and just one car......
__________________

"When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." - Benjamin Franklin




LS3 Camshaft Swap Do-It-Yourself Instructions - 2010 LS3 gone but not forgotten!!!
robertway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 09:53 AM   #23
thekid96
 
Drives: Z06, 69 Camaro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Orange County
Posts: 198
You must be referring to peak HP. Twin screw and turbos at equal boost will make more power under the curve than a centri every time, and always more torque.
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxpower5 View Post
as stated in a couple of responses - i would go with a procharger - around $7200 for the kit. you'd add 175 hp at the crank i believe.

ive researched kenne belle and whipple twin screw - although both are top of the line, you'll pay for it too. procharger still adds more hp an torque than any supercharger or single turbo.

good luck!
thekid96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 10:12 AM   #24
IPSjeff

 
Drives: 2009 ZR1
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAI Inc View Post
Superchargers take 30-40% of power to turn. A supercharged car producing 500 rwhp is putting roughly the same load on the bottom end as a turbo making 675 rwhp.
This.
IPSjeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 10:18 AM   #25
GTAHVIT
One Lucky Guy.
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: #22 Tom Henry Racing 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhand5599 View Post
Lets start some trouble. What is better Turbo or Supercharger?
And why? I have to admit I have driver a TAFC but I have never had a turbo or blown street car. I will be doing one or the other but i would to see some debate. What would be the hardest on the car?
Daily Driver?

will you take it to the track?

do you have plans to make big power (1000 hp) down the road?

are you going to keep the stock drive train?

How much power do you want now... how much boost.

Help us by answering these questions and we can give you better information.

GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supercharger / Turbocharger Results (INFO) Thread radz28 Forced Induction - V8 205 05-15-2013 09:30 PM
Stock L99 A6 Supercharger options, opinions, & experiences 2010 Bumblebee Forced Induction - V8 103 03-24-2013 06:24 PM
STS Twin Turbos SupremacyCustoms Forced Induction - V8 0 02-16-2010 01:35 PM
STS Twin Turbo Kits Coming Soon!!! tbyrne Forced Induction 18 10-19-2009 10:06 AM
ULTIMATE PERFORMANCE* TURBO Camaro SS -- 750hp Custom Single Turbo Kit (T04Z) Ultimate Performance Forced Induction - V8 496 10-11-2009 01:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.