![]() |
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Forced Induction - V6 V6 Supercharger, turbo, nitrous discussions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#51 |
|
Not a M.O.D.
|
Bore the block to 4.0, replace the pistons, cam, and tune.
- Xanthos P.S. - By the way, I suppose I'm not being completely serious. While these are all possible ways to boost power output, I highly doubt any will be remotely cost effective. I might consider a vortech kit if they come out with one though. I wouldn't every buy one from somewhere like D3 - I would want my kit designed and produced by somebody who solely does superchargers.
__________________
14.031 @ 101.54 - 3631 DA Last edited by Xanthos; 01-08-2009 at 08:28 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
34.134025, -118.321644
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
"Keep the faith." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
34.134025, -118.321644
|
Oh! That was the specific words used.
I couldn't think of it.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Not a M.O.D.
|
So... did they have a heat issue or something then?
- Xanthos
__________________
14.031 @ 101.54 - 3631 DA |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Moderator
|
There's no "official" story...but apparently, they attempted a twin turbo setup, and the engine bay was just too cramped -and hot -- resulting in the car catching fire.
__________________
"Keep the faith." |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: over there.
Posts: 15,317
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Not a M.O.D.
|
I can see it now...
"Well, it was producing roughly the heat output of a small star..." - Xanthos P.S. - Right now, if I do end up going forced induction, it'll either be an STS turbo kit or a Vortech kit. I don't really trust the D3 kit. Let the car dealer sell cars.
__________________
14.031 @ 101.54 - 3631 DA |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Enlightened
Drives: Nothing Currently Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
__________________
If you believe it is your right to speak freely no matter the content, relevance, or intelligence of statement, then it is my duty to the powers that be to set you straight.
People have to talk about something just to keep their voice boxes in working order. So they'll have good voice boxes in case there's ever anything really meaningful to say. Kurt Vonnegut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Moderator
|
Remotely mounted...unless you shove the turbo down the manifold, they're all technically external.
![]() And those little guys put out some impressive numbers. It's just...different.
__________________
"Keep the faith." |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
|
Not a M.O.D.
|
Quote:
- Xanthos P.S. - And because its not going to happen, I'd be going STS if I do end up doing F.I.
__________________
14.031 @ 101.54 - 3631 DA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Enlightened
Drives: Nothing Currently Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,307
|
Semantics. Technically they are external of the engine bay area. They have made big power, but they aren't very streetable (IMO) because of all the things that can go wrong with that mounting location.
__________________
If you believe it is your right to speak freely no matter the content, relevance, or intelligence of statement, then it is my duty to the powers that be to set you straight.
People have to talk about something just to keep their voice boxes in working order. So they'll have good voice boxes in case there's ever anything really meaningful to say. Kurt Vonnegut |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
![]() Curious...like what?
__________________
"Keep the faith." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Not a M.O.D.
|
Once again - I agree that we're arguing semantics.
Plus, there really isn't anything that could convince me to go F.I. unless it was able to guarantee that I wouldn't have to modify my current intake/exhaust plans. As it stands, once cams are out (I think more lift would REALLY wake this engine up and give it a ton more torque) I think 400 or even 425-450 flywheel horses will be easily attainable on this engine with no boost. And keeping it emissions legal at that. - Xanthos
__________________
14.031 @ 101.54 - 3631 DA |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | ||
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: over there.
Posts: 15,317
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
thats normally only true on custom setups. most people who will be going f/i will be going with aftermarket kits designed specifically for this motor. then again, with a remote mount turbo, you can pick whatever size you want.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
resident truck enthusiast
|
^^ as impressive as that engine is supposed to be, all i can say is 'thank God i ain't gotta work on it!'
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: over there.
Posts: 15,317
|
I would love to play with one.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Enlightened
Drives: Nothing Currently Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,307
|
Street trash (paper, rocks, dirt) getting trapped around the turbo, maybe getting jammed in the impeller, driving through a puddle of water that splashes on the housing (cool water+super heated metal=no bueno), going over a bump or steepish incline (especially if you lower the vehicle which is common) and tearing off an oil line or hose, vandalism/thievery etc. There's just too many variables you expose it to when its just sitting under the car.
Since we were talking about STS turbos, that is a fully custom setup. A true kit for the car I wouldn't be too concerned with.
__________________
If you believe it is your right to speak freely no matter the content, relevance, or intelligence of statement, then it is my duty to the powers that be to set you straight.
People have to talk about something just to keep their voice boxes in working order. So they'll have good voice boxes in case there's ever anything really meaningful to say. Kurt Vonnegut |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Enlightened
Drives: Nothing Currently Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
I kid, I kid.
__________________
If you believe it is your right to speak freely no matter the content, relevance, or intelligence of statement, then it is my duty to the powers that be to set you straight.
People have to talk about something just to keep their voice boxes in working order. So they'll have good voice boxes in case there's ever anything really meaningful to say. Kurt Vonnegut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 ABM Camaro 2SS LS3 w/RS Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 588
|
Quote:
__________________
Roto Fab CAI, Magnacharger MP2300, Kooks HO SS 1-7/8" LT's, Kook's Catted Connectors, Corsa SS Dual Rear Exit Cat-Back for A6 with Lasered Livernois Signature 4" Dual Wall Exit Pipes, Barton Short Throw. 546 RWHP 517 RWT
This Car Rocks !! "Bring It On" GT-500 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 ABM Camaro 2SS LS3 w/RS Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 588
|
Who puts kits out there with the cold air, intake, SC(4-6 psi), exhaust, and tune ?? Thas what I'm talkin about.....should be more cost effective for a kit like that ! no?
__________________
Roto Fab CAI, Magnacharger MP2300, Kooks HO SS 1-7/8" LT's, Kook's Catted Connectors, Corsa SS Dual Rear Exit Cat-Back for A6 with Lasered Livernois Signature 4" Dual Wall Exit Pipes, Barton Short Throw. 546 RWHP 517 RWT
This Car Rocks !! "Bring It On" GT-500 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
AwesomeBillDawesonville
Drives: Corolla =( Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 671
|
What would be the cost difference between a S/C vs TT?
Im sure the S/C would be less expensive and easier to install, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
When I think of turbos, I think of Grand Nationals that run 1/4's in the low 12 second range. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Does not have a Camaro
Drives: 99 silverado Z71/66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 475
|
When I think of turbos, I think of win.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Master of the V6
|
Modern turbo charging applications far exceed traditional supercharger applications. The biggest problem most folks shy away from is packaging constraints. The camaro engine bay isn't nearly as tight as folks make it out to be.
From an engineering standpoint, the 3.6 DI actually sounds like quite the little stormer. DI is still a new concept to most US turners, but anyone who's been in the german arena knows that DI and turbo's fit very well together. I personally am mulling around a TT concept in my head. I'm far more worried about the 6L50's torque imput ratings than how much power the engine can make. The Asin 6spd isn't exactly a high HP box either. What this chasiss needs is a responsive turbo setup (400bhp should be a no brainer), a health 300lb weight reduction and a pedders suspension :lol: |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro Laws | ChevyNut | Off-topic Discussions | 93 | 03-23-2010 09:29 PM |
| GM memo to dealers | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 02-04-2010 08:33 PM |
| CNN: Camaro: From sketchpad to street - The rebirth of a muscle car ... | Gatecrasher | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 49 | 10-05-2009 04:33 PM |
| 4 SEMA CAMAROS finally unveiled by GM! (hi-res images & details) | FenwickHockey65 | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 237 | 11-03-2008 11:39 PM |
| A Message to all Fbody Enthusiasts | TAG UR IT | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 9 | 10-25-2006 02:55 PM |