Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com

Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/index.php)
-   Forced Induction - V8 (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=74)
-   -   21CMC Camaro 667 RWHP 629 RWTQ pump gas (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=54770)

21STCENTURY 12-02-2009 01:49 PM

21CMC Camaro 667 RWHP 629 RWTQ pump gas
 
Just finished tuning another TVS 2300 Cyber Gray 2010 2SS Camaro
Stock internal LS3/stock heads
21CMC Blower Camshaft
LT Headers w. Cats
Borla Exhaust
Roto-Fab CAI
Smaller Pulley
Custom Fuel System
8.9 PSI
93 Octane Pump Gas

Over 600 RWTQ at 2500 RPMs!!

[IMG]http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...S/DSC_1977.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...O_2C_horiz.jpg[/IMG]

Best Regards,
John Page
Twenty First Century Muscle Cars

navyblueSS 12-02-2009 01:58 PM

Wow, nice numbers!!

1320junkie 12-02-2009 01:59 PM

Love that torque curve

21STCENTURY 12-02-2009 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by navyblueSS (Post 1238585)
Wow, nice numbers!!

Yes,
look how it compares under the curve to the Pro Charger,
especially the TORQUE!

Best Regards,
John Page
Twenty First Century Muscle Cars

old motorhead 12-02-2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 21STCENTURYMUSCLECARS (Post 1238613)
Yes,
look how it compares under the curve to the Pro Charger,
especially the TORQUE!

Best Regards,
John Page
Twenty First Century Muscle Cars

Now John....you know these heat soakers are only good for heavy trucks. They don't belong on sports cars. You're supposed to pro charge them and wait for 4000 rpm to see any power increase. You, of all people, should know this.:D

Good job. Bet the owner is one happy camper.

Z_Rocks 12-02-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by old motorhead (Post 1238796)
Now John....you know these heat soakers are only good for heavy trucks. They don't belong on sports cars.

You are mean man... I'm gonne tell D***:laughabove:

Z_Rocks 12-02-2009 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 21STCENTURYMUSCLECARS (Post 1238546)
Just finished tuning another TVS 2300 Cyber Gray 2010 2SS Camaro
Stock internal LS3/stock heads
21CMC Blower Camshaft
LT Headers w. Cats
Borla Exhaust
Roto-Fab CAI
Smaller Pulley
Custom Fuel System
8.9 PSI
93 Octane Pump Gas

Over 600 RWTQ at 2500 RPMs!!

Best Regards,
John Page
Twenty First Century Muscle Cars

John, in your professional opinion, don't you think over 600RWTQ is too much load on the stock rods and/or pistons at such a low RPM?

DarkNight 12-02-2009 03:34 PM

Very nice #s.......gotta love that torque curve!!!

What, a Custom Fuel System? What did ya do to upgrade the fuel system?

Great job!!!

old motorhead 12-02-2009 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z_Rocks (Post 1238965)
John, in your professional opinion, don't you think over 600RWTQ is too much load on the stock rods and/or pistons at such a low RPM?

Just becuz you have it available at such a low rpm doesn't mean you have to use all of it. If you want to do some serious a$$ hauling, you're going to downshift. What makes these TVS units so sweet, is the power increase down low where you do 99% of your driving. A few psi of boost in around town driving is sweet. Full boost at low rpm isn't advisable, but a little boost in your day to day driving is all good. It's like have 650 cubic inches of displacement at your disposal, but not having to pay the price unless you use it.

Z_Rocks 12-02-2009 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by old motorhead (Post 1239578)
Just becuz you have it available at such a low rpm doesn't mean you have to use all of it. If you want to do some serious a$$ hauling, you're going to downshift. What makes these TVS units so sweet, is the power increase down low where you do 99% of your driving. A few psi of boost in around town driving is sweet. Full boost at low rpm isn't advisable, but a little boost in your day to day driving is all good. It's like have 650 cubic inches of displacement at your disposal, but not having to pay the price unless you use it.

I agree 100% of having low end TQ, no doubt about it to get up and go. My main point (if you noticed) I was pointing at high boost in low RPM, where $hit hits the fan :facepalm:

old motorhead 12-02-2009 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z_Rocks (Post 1239631)
I agree 100% of having low end TQ, no doubt about it to get up and go. My main point (if you noticed) I was pointing at high boost in low RPM, where $hit hits the fan :facepalm:

Most folks that ask that question are usually trying to turn a positive into a negative. Their f/i system of choice can't make the power quickly so, in their mind, boost at a low rpm can't be good. Not at all saying that your post is leading in that direction. I agree that full boost at 2500 rpm is not a good program. It's just that full boost at low rpm isn't necessary. You won't have it with an auto tranny (it will downshift and rpm will go up as soon as you hit the go pedal), and you shouldn't use it with a manual gear box.

onechuck 12-03-2009 07:53 AM

So you guys did this with no head work? What would happen with a little head massage. Give us a price if we just drop off our car and you guys handle it.

east TX Muscle cars 12-03-2009 09:43 AM

:w00t:

21STCENTURY 12-03-2009 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z_Rocks (Post 1238965)
John, in your professional opinion, don't you think over 600RWTQ is too much load on the stock rods and/or pistons at such a low RPM?

We have done quite a few 600+ rwhp forced induction cars over the past 8 1/2 years, including several LS6 stock bottom end cars that are still living.

I usually suggest at least getting forged pistons and/or lowering the compression for the larger psi boosted cars on anything over 550-ish
RWHP although the tuning, fuel system, octane, temps and how hard the car is beat on make more difference in how the engine handles the power than the actual power # itself.

Best Regards,
John Page


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.