Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com

Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/index.php)
-   Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   How Much can it handle? (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10593)

TJ91 12-14-2008 11:31 AM

How Much can it handle?
 
Hey guys, ive been hearing that Direct Injection makes tuning more difficult, and that the high compression ratio makes FI a little dangerous, how much do you think you can gain without going FI on the 3.6 DI, besides the cold air intake and exhausts?

djsnoflake 12-14-2008 01:05 PM

If by FI you mean fuel injected, you would pretty much have to reprogram the ECU, wouldn't you? And like mod the engine and stuff so it goes back to old fashioned fuel injection, which ruins the point of the engine.
Last I heard, nobody has cracked the ECU on that engine yet. So then you would have to heavily retrofit the engine with a bunch of old gear that might not get you the HP that the engine had before you started mucking about. And I imagine that could end up getting close to costing you as much as it would to get an SS.
Of course I am only a computer desk mechanic, so everything i typed may be wrong.

TJ91 12-14-2008 01:25 PM

oh sorry i meant, forced induction, like supershargers or turbos, i wanted to know what other things i could do to bump up my numbers

Shadowsong 12-14-2008 03:10 PM

Well, You've got some people saying that the DI makes no difference in how the motor handles boost, and others saying that the high comp. isn't as big of an issue because of the DI.

Honestly, I don't think anyone knows for sure.

I'm just going to sit back and watch

Xanthos 12-14-2008 03:17 PM

1 Horsepower...

In all seriousness, I'm shooting for naturally aspirated 380 flywheel horses for under 2500 on my 3.6 DI - at least, the one I will be getting - and have a solid plan for getting there. 400 wouldn't take much more, but I don't want to sacrifice the fuel economy to get there.
- Xanthos

P.S. - In case you're interested, I'm going with a custom spectre modular air intake, ported throttle body for venturi effect, semi-full exhaust (shorty headers once somebody makes them, high flow cats, mufflers), higher ratio rocker arms, and custom tune. I'm reasonably confident this will get me to at least 380 flywheel horses, if not more, seeing how a cold air intake and cat-back with no tune netted 340 flywheel horses on the CTS with this engine. IF somebody makes a set of mild cams for the right price, and they don't seriously effect fuel economy, I might hook myself up with a set as well to hit that 400 flywheel horsepower mark. I might also advance the ignition timing a few (2-3) degrees and see where that gets me.

P.P.S - As far as DI and boost - in some ways it will help, in others it won't. You still have to worry about blowing gaskets and whatnot from the sheer pressure, but the DI has a cooling effect on the air/fuel mixture - not to mention that the droplets are smaller so will provide a more even mixture - that will burn more evenly with less chance of knock. Its like having an inherent intercooler. At least, on paper. We won't know for sure till somebody straps a turbo/super up to one.

Shadowsong 12-14-2008 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XanthosV6 (Post 216808)
1 Horsepower...

In all seriousness, I'm shooting for naturally aspirated 380 flywheel horses for under 2500 on my 3.6 DI - at least, the one I will be getting - and have a solid plan for getting there. 400 wouldn't take much more, but I don't want to sacrifice the fuel economy to get there.
- Xanthos

P.S. - In case you're interested, I'm going with a custom spectre modular air intake, ported throttle body for venturi effect, semi-full exhaust (shorty headers once somebody makes them, high flow cats, mufflers), higher ratio rocker arms, and custom tune. I'm reasonably confident this will get me to at least 380 flywheel horses, if not more, seeing how a cold air intake and cat-back with no tune netted 340 flywheel horses on the CTS with this engine. IF somebody makes a set of mild cams for the right price, and they don't seriously effect fuel economy, I might hook myself up with a set as well to hit that 400 flywheel horsepower mark. I might also advance the ignition timing a few (2-3) degrees and see where that gets me.

P.P.S - As far as DI and boost - in some ways it will help, in others it won't. You still have to worry about blowing gaskets and whatnot from the sheer pressure, but the DI has a cooling effect on the air/fuel mixture - not to mention that the droplets are smaller so will provide a more even mixture - that will burn more evenly with less chance of knock. Its like having an inherent intercooler. At least, on paper. We won't know for sure till somebody straps a turbo/super up to one.

Doesn't D3 have a cts with a supercharger on it?

CamaroSpike23 12-14-2008 03:52 PM

wow... why do I feel a sense of deja vu?


oh thats right....

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...rect+injection

5 lbs non intercooled, 6+ intercool or run against the clock.

direct injection should make tuning easier. as well as FI as you dont have to worry about the air/fuel mixture preigniting as much as you used to.

and there is a s/c alread for the v-6


Quote:

D3's latest project is a supercharger for the direct-injected 3.6L V-6 powering the 2009 Cadillac CTS that should make around 400 hp and will slot neatly between the stock 300-hp engine and the 556-hp 6.2L V-8 of the CTS-V.

SS4EVER 12-14-2008 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadowsong (Post 216806)
Honestly, I don't think anyone knows for sure.

I'm just going to sit back and watch

Yeah, until the Camaro comes out and the aftermarket vendors get their hands on it all we can do is speculate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by XanthosV6 (Post 216808)
1 Horsepower...

In all seriousness, I'm shooting for naturally aspirated 380 flywheel horses for under 2500 on my 3.6 DI - at least, the one I will be getting - and have a solid plan for getting there. 400 wouldn't take much more, but I don't want to sacrifice the fuel economy to get there.
- Xanthos

P.S. - In case you're interested, I'm going with a custom spectre modular air intake, ported throttle body for venturi effect, semi-full exhaust (shorty headers once somebody makes them, high flow cats, mufflers), higher ratio rocker arms, and custom tune. I'm reasonably confident this will get me to at least 380 flywheel horses, if not more, seeing how a cold air intake and cat-back with no tune netted 340 flywheel horses on the CTS with this engine. IF somebody makes a set of mild cams for the right price, and they don't seriously effect fuel economy, I might hook myself up with a set as well to hit that 400 flywheel horsepower mark. I might also advance the ignition timing a few (2-3) degrees and see where that gets me.

Reasonably with all of the mods you mentioned you probably could get 70-80hp out of the V6 w out going F.I. but I would predict that to be at most.

But with what you just mentioned, that's probably easily 3-4k in mods, if not more. I guess doing it over a period of time may not be soo bad, but for around the same price you may be able to just convert to F.I. and get better power... Maybe, Maybe not....

With just full bolt-ons probably a 30-40hp increase.

Again there's no way of really telling until the Camaro is out....

theholycow 12-14-2008 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XanthosV6 (Post 216808)
the DI has a cooling effect on the air/fuel mixture - not to mention that the droplets are smaller so will provide a more even mixture - that will burn more evenly with less chance of knock. Its like having an inherent intercooler. At least, on paper. We won't know for sure till somebody straps a turbo/super up to one.

Volkswagen's latest 2.0 turbo engine is DI, I'm pretty sure. IIRC, the great thing about DI is that you can change when the fuel is injected, so you don't have to worry about knock; DI should be better than SFI for FI.

Sorry about the vagueness. I'd apologize for the heavy use of acronyms too, but that was necessary. You know, I could type a couple dozen more characters to spell out "forced induction", "direct injection", and "sequential fuel injection"...or I could type out this long-winded explanation instead. I mean, really, what would you do? :D

Xanthos 12-16-2008 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SS4EVER (Post 216848)
Yeah, until the Camaro comes out and the aftermarket vendors get their hands on it all we can do is speculate.



Reasonably with all of the mods you mentioned you probably could get 70-80hp out of the V6 w out going F.I. but I would predict that to be at most.

But with what you just mentioned, that's probably easily 3-4k in mods, if not more. I guess doing it over a period of time may not be soo bad, but for around the same price you may be able to just convert to F.I. and get better power... Maybe, Maybe not....

With just full bolt-ons probably a 30-40hp increase.

Again there's no way of really telling until the Camaro is out....

Well, We already know that the LLT nets just about 40 flywheel horses from intake and catback alone, with no tune. My intake will be quite a bit more sophisticated than the one D3 used, so I expect to net about 5 more horses on top of that from the intake. Drop 5 horses because I'm not changing out the pipes, just the mufflers, as far has "cat-back" goes. At about 3 horses per high flow cat, we're looking at 10 for that. It seems pretty much the common conclusion that a tune would net 15 horses or so. That means that headers AND rocker arm swaps would need to net me 15 horses, with the tune, for me to hit my 380 mark. Doesn't seem unreasonable at all to me, and thats not even including the cam swap.

As far as prices being 3-4k? I don't know where you did your math, but let me show you mine:

Custom Intake - $150 - Made/Installed by me.
Mufflers - $200 - Installed at local exhaust shop
High Flow Cats - $400 - Installed at local exhaust shop
Headers - $300 - Installed at local exhaust shop
Throttle Body Port - Free - Done by me.
Rocker Arms - $500 - Installed by me/my step-dad.
Tune - $500

Total - 2050 before you talk labor at the exhaust shop, and my exhaust shop is really fair on they're labor prices. How you got 3-4k is beyond me.
- Xanthos

P.S. - D3's supercharged caddy was still in prototype phases, last I checked. I haven't been following it avidly though, because I'm more of a turbo or naturally aspirated guy.

Vash 12-16-2008 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadowsong (Post 216806)
Well, You've got some people saying that the DI makes no difference in how the motor handles boost, and others saying that the high comp. isn't as big of an issue because of the DI.

Honestly, I don't think anyone knows for sure.

I'm just going to sit back and watch

Aye all this inspector gadget stuff is lolerz...

Some of these people.... it's like inspector gadget...

If your gonna spend big bucks go v8. Half the fun is at the stoplight when it's rumbling. No offense to the V6 and V6 modders but it's like

"omg can it accept noobian hyperdrive motovators??"... etc. etc.. overkill.:thumbup:

Mr. Wyndham 12-16-2008 01:45 PM

hmpf. There's more to life than 8 cylinders. ;)

j.k., of course :bellyroll:

ZYAL8R 12-17-2008 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vash (Post 218201)
Aye all this inspector gadget stuff is lolerz...

Some of these people.... it's like inspector gadget...

If your gonna spend big bucks go v8. Half the fun is at the stoplight when it's rumbling. No offense to the V6 and V6 modders but it's like

"omg can it accept noobian hyperdrive motovators??"... etc. etc.. overkill.:thumbup:

HUH?!:character0182:

Xanthos 12-17-2008 01:32 AM

Quote:

If your gonna spend big bucks go v8. Half the fun is at the stoplight when it's rumbling. No offense to the V6 and V6 modders but it's like

"omg can it accept noobian hyperdrive motovators??"... etc. etc.. overkill. :thumbup:
First off, I've driven V8 cars before - plenty of them. And I don't think I'm going to miss out on the rumble at the stoplight thing just because I'm buying a V6. My car will rumble too - in fact, once its done I would be surprised if most people would mistake it FOR a V8.

If I wanted the horsepower potential to be higher, then yes, I'd be getting the V8 instead of the V6. But I don't. The V6 will easily get to the amount of power that I want and I don't want any more than that. Plus, insurance will be loads cheaper, payments will be cheaper, gas mileage will be better, and I can honestly say I would enjoy the car more. With the V8 I would be tempted to line it up at the stop light. This way I won't.

And, I'm eventually going to turn my car into a road race car - maybe some autocross too. So, I'll be getting the V6 for its lighter weight and superior weight distribution. Also, if I can get my car to 380 horses and pull the 100 lbs I would like to drop, I'll have a 9.6 to one power to weight ratio, compared to the V8's 9.3 to one - close enough for what I want, seeing how I'm shooting for a 13 second 1/4. Plus, fuel economy will be better, and the price will be cheaper overall. Total price for the way I want my car is going to come up to just under 26,000 - thats 5,000 worth of mods and its still 5,000 less than the V8's MSRP. And it'll be close enough in speed to be able to take an average driver. Maybe even more because I'll be swapping the suspension too, which should make up for that .3 to one power to weight difference.

I understand that all of this probably means absolutely nothing to you V8 guys, but what it means to me is that I don't give a rats a$$ what you think my car should be. I know how I want my car to be - run, sound, look - and I will have it just like that. And I will be happy with it just the way it is.

So, don't come over here to the V6 forum tooting your own horn about how the V8 is so much better than the V6. Go to the V8 forum for that. Those of us over here know what we want just like you know what you want and you don't have to be a dick just because they aren't the same thing.
- Xanthos

Grape Ape 12-17-2008 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XanthosV6 (Post 216808)
1 Horsepower...

In all seriousness, I'm shooting for naturally aspirated 380 flywheel horses for under 2500 on my 3.6 DI - at least, the one I will be getting - and have a solid plan for getting there. 400 wouldn't take much more, but I don't want to sacrifice the fuel economy to get there.
- Xanthos

P.S. - In case you're interested, I'm going with a custom spectre modular air intake, ported throttle body for venturi effect, semi-full exhaust (shorty headers once somebody makes them, high flow cats, mufflers), higher ratio rocker arms, and custom tune. I'm reasonably confident this will get me to at least 380 flywheel horses, if not more, seeing how a cold air intake and cat-back with no tune netted 340 flywheel horses on the CTS with this engine. IF somebody makes a set of mild cams for the right price, and they don't seriously effect fuel economy, I might hook myself up with a set as well to hit that 400 flywheel horsepower mark. I might also advance the ignition timing a few (2-3) degrees and see where that gets me.

P.P.S - As far as DI and boost - in some ways it will help, in others it won't. You still have to worry about blowing gaskets and whatnot from the sheer pressure, but the DI has a cooling effect on the air/fuel mixture - not to mention that the droplets are smaller so will provide a more even mixture - that will burn more evenly with less chance of knock. Its like having an inherent intercooler. At least, on paper. We won't know for sure till somebody straps a turbo/super up to one.

Does the LLT have rocker arms? I thought that the cams acted directly on the valves like most (all?) DOHC engines.

Mr. Wyndham 12-17-2008 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grape Ape (Post 219181)
Does the LLT have rocker arms? I thought that the cams acted directly on the valves like most (all?) DOHC engines.

The cams push down on rocker arms which pivot, and push down the valves. It looks similar to an OHV engine's setup, except the rockers are ancored at one end, touch the valve on the other end, and get pushed by the cam in the middle. I don't think any OHC engines act directly on the valve stems...I could be totally wrong, though.

Flighttester 12-17-2008 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJ91 (Post 216709)
Hey guys, ive been hearing that Direct Injection makes tuning more difficult, and that the high compression ratio makes FI a little dangerous, how much do you think you can gain without going FI on the 3.6 DI, besides the cold air intake and exhausts?

The only reason direct injection might make tuning more difficult would be because it just might already be wound as tight as practical. Other than that, direct injection has no negative effects except that it is costly to offer. The fact that the engine apparently runs well on regular fuel tells me that Forced induction (turbocharging or supercharging) is well within the limits of the stock engine if Premium fuel is used and room for such hardware is available in the engine compartment. If it is, I wouldn't be too amazed if a blown Northstar couldn't make more HP and torque than a pushrod Chevy V-8.

I wouldn't want it, even if it becomes available but, I would never dis direct injection.

It is certainly the state-of-the art and probably the future for all cars, except perhaps the most price sensative models.

Flighttester 12-17-2008 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragoneye (Post 219207)
The cams push down on rocker arms which pivot, and push down the valves. It looks similar to an OHV engine's setup, except the rockers are ancored at one end, touch the valve on the other end, and get pushed by the cam in the middle. I don't think any OHC engines act directly on the valve stems...I could be totally wrong, though.

Indeed, you are wrong.

My '00 DOHC Mazda Miata has solid, direct acting bucket cam followers that are mounted directly above the valve and the cam lobe is directly above that. The valve lash is set by measuring the clearance and replacing removeable shims till the lash is within limits.

Many high-reving engines are made like that and many european race engines incorporate that design since it is about as low-mass as it is possible to get. It does make setting the lash more difficult but it is also possible to have hydraulic (self adjusting) cam followers with that design. Early Miata's did just that. The mechanical type was better and actually more reliable long-term though.

But, because of the difficulty setting lash, many OHC engines do use rocker arms, just for the ease of setting lash. I don't like it but it does make for more simple maintenance, even if it does increase the mass of the reciprocating parts.

I wouldn't even want the push rod V-8, even if it was cheaper, just because the V-6 has a better induction system and a much better valve train. You really can beat cubic inches. It just takes technology.

CamaroSpike23 12-18-2008 06:54 PM

wow....

some of the arguments posted make me want to :suicide:

TheClassicCarKid 12-18-2008 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flighttester (Post 219291)
Indeed, you are wrong.

My '00 DOHC Mazda Miata has solid, direct acting bucket cam followers that are mounted directly above the valve and the cam lobe is directly above that. The valve lash is set by measuring the clearance and replacing removeable shims till the lash is within limits.

Many high-reving engines are made like that and many european race engines incorporate that design since it is about as low-mass as it is possible to get. It does make setting the lash more difficult but it is also possible to have hydraulic (self adjusting) cam followers with that design. Early Miata's did just that. The mechanical type was better and actually more reliable long-term though.

But, because of the difficulty setting lash, many OHC engines do use rocker arms, just for the ease of setting lash. I don't like it but it does make for more simple maintenance, even if it does increase the mass of the reciprocating parts.

I wouldn't even want the push rod V-8, even if it was cheaper, just because the V-6 has a better induction system and a much better valve train. You really can beat cubic inches. It just takes technology.

6.2>3.6
The bigger V8 will always have more potential

Mr Twisty 12-18-2008 09:06 PM

Never under-estimate a man with a 6cyl and something to prove :)
(Deep pockets help too)
This thread reminds me of when the LS1 first came out, it was so new no one knew what to do with it. I followed the musings of a man that thought he could always improve just about anything, and he usually did. His name was John Lingenfelter, RIP dude.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it was a wicked fast 4-banger that started his downhill slide, among other unfortunate circumstances.

Unrelated video, but don't discount the 6, cuz it might just bite ya in the buttocks.


Grape Ape 12-18-2008 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragoneye (Post 219207)
The cams push down on rocker arms which pivot, and push down the valves. It looks similar to an OHV engine's setup, except the rockers are ancored at one end, touch the valve on the other end, and get pushed by the cam in the middle. I don't think any OHC engines act directly on the valve stems...I could be totally wrong, though.

I'd always heard it called a finger lifter. Is anyone curently offering a higher ratio part? It seems to me that you'd need some sort of adapter to move the pivot. And between the high compression ratio and the VVT, it doesn't seem like you could add too much lift before the valves start interfacing with the pistons.

I am also curious about the porting you want to do to the TB. The only venturi effect I know of is the one that makes carbs work, but I can't figure out how it could help the LLT make more power.

I'm asking because I'm trying to decide which engine to get.

BryGo 12-18-2008 11:12 PM

"omg can it accept noobian hyperdrive motovators??"... etc. etc.. overkill.:thumbup:[/QUOTE]



Will noobian overdrive motovators make my Camaro go faster?

That was funny. +1 to you! As funny as "transduction modificator port."

Heres one: The Eludium Pew Thirty Six Explosive Space Modulator----Marvin the Martian

:respekt:

Xanthos 12-19-2008 02:27 AM

The venturi effect is used in carburetors, yes, but its a general term used to describe the increase in velocity that a fluid (such as air) experiences when passing through a tube that is decreasing in area. Basically I would leave the area by the throttle blades the same width, and then port it out till I get to the outer edge. This would cause a slight increase in air velocity, which will help keep the engine from starving in the upper RPMs. Won't make a big difference in the total air flow, but it should help noticably reduce pumping loses, in the way that a short ram intake reduces pumping loses in order to make power.
- Xanthos

SS4EVER 01-05-2009 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flighttester (Post 219291)
I wouldn't even want the push rod V-8, even if it was cheaper, just because the V-6 has a better induction system and a much better valve train. You really can beat cubic inches. It just takes technology.

Sorry but a better induction system and a "much better valvetrain" doesn't = more potential.

A V8 will always have more potential than a V6.

For performance the V8 will be better than the V6. Now there's some exceptions like the Supra, which back in it's day the tt 2JZ, was taking on the C4 ZR1.

But sorry guys. If you buy the V6 Camaro, nothing against it but if you're buying it with any bit of performance in mind (exception being light mods for sound or a little better performance over stock) let me tell you right now you're better of spending the extra few k for the SS.

Mr. Wyndham 01-05-2009 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SS4EVER (Post 235543)
But sorry guys. If you buy the V6 Camaro, nothing against it but if you're buying it with any bit of performance in mind (exception being light mods for sound or a little better performance over stock) let me tell you right now you're better of spending the extra few k for the SS.

You don't think the credentials of the V6 don't qualify it as having a "bit of performance"?

imo, there's performance (V6 Camaro and it's equals), and then there's straight-up crazy-a$$ performance (SS and it's cohorts). Different levels, but I'd still consider them all performance.

Mindz 01-05-2009 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flighttester (Post 219291)
I wouldn't even want the push rod V-8, even if it was cheaper, just because the V-6 has a better induction system and a much better valve train. You really can beat cubic inches. It just takes technology.

And if you put that same technology and put it on the bigger displacement engine...?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SS4EVER (Post 235543)
But sorry guys. If you buy the V6 Camaro, nothing against it but if you're buying it with any bit of performance in mind (exception being light mods for sound or a little better performance over stock) let me tell you right now you're better of spending the extra few k for the SS.

The v6 with minor mods will be giving the Mustang GT's a run for their money with the 315 hp that the GT is putting out. Not everyone can afford an SS and to trick it out. I'm sure that with the same money I'll be paying for my SS, I could have a more-powerful-better-performing-warranty-voided-v6.

V8 gives more potential but it's a high price to start out. If you had 38 grand and could never put another dime towards it aside from scheduled maintenance/tires/etc. a modded v6 would probably be better than a 2SS/RS with a bolt on or two...

Xanthos 01-05-2009 11:45 PM

All this talk of the V6 being worthless just makes me want to buy mine, put on my custom intake and full exhaust - then once cams come out for it and the box is cracked, we'll see what the performance is. I expect it to be as high, if not higher, than a stock SS.
- Xanthos

P.S. -

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mindz (Post 235558)
And if you put that same technology and put it on the bigger displacement engine...?



The v6 with minor mods will be giving the Mustang GT's a run for their money with the 315 hp that the GT is putting out. Not everyone can afford an SS and to trick it out. I'm sure that with the same money I'll be paying for my SS, I could have a more-powerful-better-performing-warranty-voided-v6.

V8 gives more potential but it's a high price to start out. If you had 38 grand and could never put another dime towards it aside from scheduled maintenance/tires/etc. a modded v6 would probably be better than a 2SS/RS with a bolt on or two...

:word: Or an almost as good one, with the warranty still intact.

Camaro_Corvette 01-05-2009 11:46 PM

After you do that xanthos, you keep in contact with me because I am probably gonna do the same thing.:thumbsup:

Mindz 01-05-2009 11:48 PM

Xanthos, if I could pass up the v8 being my first car with real power I'd be in the same boat. I've set my goals and as tempting as the v6 is, I feel that I need the v8. The v6 would be much easier on my pocketbook though. =P

Xanthos 01-05-2009 11:55 PM

I had a V8 - not a crazy fast one, but a decent one.

There are a number of reasons why I don't want a V8 in my new camaro. Insurance costs is one. Price is another.

The biggest one? If I bought the LS3, I would do this to it and probably hurt myself, or worse, wreck my baby (the camaro).

I know it seems weird, but I want about 400 HP, and not much more. I don't trust myself with more. 400 will make the car fast enough to really enjoy driving, even when I take it to the track, but not fast enough to where I'll be tempted to do something really stupid on public roads.

With the V6, I'll be able to do all the mods I want to do, and have the kind of power I want, and I think it'll sound good enough to where more people than I can count will say "thats a V6?"

And to scare the crap out of more than a few mustangs.
- Xanthos

Mindz 01-06-2009 12:05 AM

400 hp in a v6 is more than respectable. I might end up with a 6 cylinder later on in life, but I'm going to enjoy what I feel might be the last of the big displacement years while I can. You've had that experience so you're fine with a v6 and I probably would feel the same way had I experienced it too.

Xanthos 01-06-2009 12:11 AM

True. I never would have sold my 86 had I not blown the tranny. Just couldn't afford to replace it on top of everything else.

I guess I'm sitting in the same croud with the people who want the V8 but are going to keep it stock, except that I wouldn't keep it stock.

This way I can mod to my hearts content and still be about the same level as a stock V8.
- Xanthos

P.S. - And I have a feeling it will sound just as good (as stock) too.

stovt001 01-06-2009 01:14 AM

I'm leaning towards the V6 now. The majority of fun I'll be having with this car is the abundance of mountain roads in my backyard, including the infamous GMR. The lighter weight and better balance of the V6 favors that, and being young insurance costs are on my mind too (better gas mileage helps too). A few mods for a bit more power (like the 340 already mentioned) plus a few suspension mods should make the V6 model a fine canyon carver. I only wish we could get the brembos on the V6 models.

Xanthos 01-06-2009 01:19 AM

I'm sure a brembo kit will come out for it.
- Xanthos

P.S. - I may get bigger brakes for mine some day, but I'll probably just settle with braided steel brake lines.

Never2LowChevy 01-06-2009 01:19 AM

Sorry, No disrespect, but a V6 will NEVER sound as good as a V8. Ive had a V6 that wasnt a slouch by any means but never did it measure up to a V8 sound or fun factor wise. Saying that you want people to say "thats a V6?" is the same as people seeing and hearing a STOCK V8 and saying "wow, thats stock?". Its kinda like a Harley Davidson, if somthing sounds "mean" it should BE mean. If your V6 SOUNDS mean but cant beat a V8 with an exhaust, your still gonna get laughed at and asked "that thing is modified?" Now if your runnin against other V6s then yeah, go for it. If your REALLY worried about insurance and gas milage, buy an aveo... you could always put an exhaust on it and have people ask "thats a 4 cylinder?"

Xanthos 01-06-2009 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Never2LowChevy (Post 235630)
Sorry, No disrespect, but a V6 will NEVER sound as good as a V8. Ive had a V6 that wasnt a slouch by any means but never did it measure up to a V8 sound or fun factor wise. Saying that you want people to say "thats a V6?" is the same as people seeing and hearing a STOCK V8 and saying "wow, thats stock?". Its kinda like a Harley Davidson, if somthing sounds "mean" it should BE mean. If your V6 SOUNDS mean but cant beat a V8 with an exhaust, your still gonna get laughed at and asked "that thing is modified?" Now if your runnin against other V6s then yeah, go for it. If your REALLY worried about insurance and gas milage, buy an aveo... you could always put an exhaust on it and have people ask "thats a 4 cylinder?"

For saying you meant no disrespect, you certainly sounded like you were trying to be disrespectful.

Since you only joined a month ago, let me fill you in. A little while back a video came out of a prototype, and it included exhaust sound. There was a LOT of debate about which engine it was. It was the V6. That people can even debate that the stock V6 exhaust is really the V8 speaks wonders. With the aftermarket it'll sound that much better.

So how about you hold off on your "no disrespect" until after the car is out, and you can hear for yourself how it sounds with some nice, mean flowmasters on it.
- Xanthos

Mindz 01-06-2009 01:32 AM

Sounds is the same as looks, each is different to everyone. I love the sound of a high revving Ferrari v8 (F355), and some people could argue that they love the sound of a 2JZ-GTE from the Supra. You might like the sound of the big displacement mucle car engine. Xanthos may like the sound of the v8 but can't afford/doesn't want to spend the money for the car/insurance/gas bundle.

The post about people guessing if that red v6 was really a v8 or not is a GREAT POINT. 95% of the people posting in that thread were on the fence because hardly anyone could tell...

headpunter 01-06-2009 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mindz (Post 235640)
Sounds is the same as looks, each is different to everyone. I love the sound of a high revving Ferrari v8 (F355), and some people could argue that they love the sound of a 2JZ-GTE from the Supra. You might like the sound of the big displacement mucle car engine. Xanthos may like the sound of the v8 but can't afford/doesn't want to spend the money for the car/insurance/gas bundle.

The post about people guessing if that red v6 was really a v8 or not is a GREAT POINT. 95% of the people posting in that thread were on the fence because hardly anyone could tell...

it was a v8, it started as a v8 and was visually converted to look like a v6 since they are wanting to push the v6. there were pictures of it from the anniversary show at the Buffalo plant, were some one opened the hood. Fbodfather confirmed it aswell.

Xanthos 01-06-2009 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by headpunter (Post 235641)
it was a v8, it started as a v8 and was visually converted to look like a v6 since they are wanting to push the v6. there were pictures of it from the anniversary show at the Buffalo plant, were some one opened the hood. Fbodfather confirmed it aswell.

Are we thinking of the same one?

I'll be the first to concede if I'm wrong, but I seem to remember it was confirmed by the higher ups as being a V6, not a V8 - because it was Jalopnik claiming it was a V8.

Of course, if anybody would know how the story really ended up, it would be headpunter. :bow:
- Xanthos


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.