Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com

Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/index.php)
-   Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Camaro 2010 SS First 1/4 Mile Test (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19663)

theshadow1234 04-23-2009 10:39 AM

Camaro 2010 SS First 1/4 Mile Test
 
Sorry guys...Im not sure if this is a repost but just ran into this video on the the tube...

Hennessey Performance tests their bone stock 2010 Camaro SS at Lonestar Motorsports Park and runs 13.6 @ 108 mph with a 2.3 60 ft.


UCF w00t 04-23-2009 10:40 AM



(click video to go to youtube as they have it in HD)

theshadow1234 04-23-2009 10:40 AM

Ah Thanks!

BackinBlackSS/RS 04-23-2009 10:42 AM

2.3 60ft :barf: no wonder time stunk. Got anyone else that can drive? :)

dodson914 04-23-2009 10:43 AM

That's pretty disappointing. Can't wait until we see members start posting times. :D

UCF w00t 04-23-2009 10:45 AM

Yea, that 0-60 was crap. Even the mags got better times. I bet he went a lil slow on purpose. Think about it... they're trying to sell upgrades. It benefits them to have a bigger "increase".

BackinBlackSS/RS 04-23-2009 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UCF w00t (Post 427195)
Yea, that 0-60 was crap. Even the mags got better times. I bet he went a lil slow on purpose. Think about it... they're trying to sell upgrades. It benefits them to have a bigger "increase".

Oh dude, I did not think of that. You nailed it. :thumbup:

Captain Awesome 04-23-2009 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BackinBlackSS/RS (Post 427189)
2.3 60ft :barf: no wonder time stunk. Got anyone else that can drive? :)

I don't know this guy? Is he independent? Or is he a tuner who's going to "dog it" in the stock runs so when he starts modding it that the performance increase is made much better when he drives it well?

theshadow1234 04-23-2009 10:48 AM

What were the times that the other MAGS had @ Stock?

Thanks.

Crowley 04-23-2009 10:48 AM

It will be interesting to see what real people can do with this .. I'm not to worried about the 13.6 as w/ the 2.3 60' time as usually 1 on the little end is worth 2 on the top end .. so a 2.0 would come in around 13.0 .. I'm more worried about the 108mph .. seems very low for the manual ..

Crowley

Captain Awesome 04-23-2009 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UCF w00t (Post 427195)
Yea, that 0-60 was crap. Even the mags got better times. I bet he went a lil slow on purpose. Think about it... they're trying to sell upgrades. It benefits them to have a bigger "increase".

Nevermind what I just asked.

Thanks.

2010 2-Tone 04-23-2009 10:50 AM

I agree that the car is quite a bit quicker than that. That is the slowest time that I have yet by anyone.:mad0260::mad0260:

BackinBlackSS/RS 04-23-2009 10:55 AM

He really looked like he was out for a Sunday drive. :)

fdjizm 04-23-2009 10:59 AM

yet when you guys post crap slow mustang runs everyone claps and swears thats what they really run lol..."waving at pot calling the kettle black" gotta love it


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.