Originally Posted by SixGracing (Post 6913288)

Here's a video of my 21 year old daughter taking this 2012 Mustang GT at the midnight drags. She's only driven the car one other time, get's a slow start but still takes him. :clap2:

Just a note: This is filmed in Utah at Rocky Mountain Raceways. DA this night was 6800'. Terrible air, especially for an NA car. We've ran mid 11's in Vegas.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIC4b-NHDPE

Originally Posted by 2013 RaceRed 5.0 (Post 6955089)

I don't get it.

Why do people (whatever the cars involved) put up vids where they race a car with some "bolt on's" ... against their car which they stated has "$6K in the motor, $13K overall in upgrades"?

Is that really a "win", and if so ...

What kind of a measurable win is it?

P.S. This has nothing to do with "Camaro vs. Mustang", as I would be asking the same question if the roles were reversed.

Originally Posted by Sugarfree135 (Post 6958003)

I agree man like when guys talk about how they beat a stock mustang and then say "ALL I have is cai, lt headers, catback, and tune" like they only have 70 extra hp over stock lol

Originally Posted by bowtieguyvegas (Post 6963128)

Or they say how they beat your stock ss with a stock mustang that has the stock trackpak option gears FPR CAI and Exhaust like that is not an upgrade in stock performance :facepalm:

Originally Posted by bowtieguyvegas (Post 6963128)

Or they say how they beat your stock ss with a stock mustang that has the stock trackpak option gears FPR CAI and Exhaust like that is not an upgrade in stock performance :facepalm:

Originally Posted by bowtieguyvegas (Post 6963128)

Or they say how they beat your stock ss with a stock mustang that has the stock trackpak option gears FPR CAI and Exhaust like that is not an upgrade in stock performance :facepalm:

Originally Posted by Cody6.2 (Post 6965874)

That is one of the dumbest things I've ever read on here.