Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com

Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/index.php)
-   Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=85)
-   -   Camaro ZL1 Quarter mile E.T.s 11.?? (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=159610)

nhra stocker 07-19-2011 10:00 AM

Camaro ZL1 Quarter mile E.T.s 11.??
 
I was looking at the CTS-V Quarter mile records from the Cadillac Owners forum and was wondering how comparable these numbers will be to the ZL-1? So many things play into this weight, actual horsepower numbers, traction.... ect. Bone stock its ran a 11.99 @ 118 mph. How much will The Z improve on that???

http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums...ions-list.html

BackinBlackSS/RS 07-19-2011 10:08 AM

I'm not sure anyone can answer that until we know the final specs on the car. :iono:

SS-screamer 07-19-2011 10:11 AM

Stiffer suspension, more power and lighter.

My guess: 11.89

BLACK10 07-19-2011 10:20 AM

12.10

toehead93 07-19-2011 11:41 AM

Well, the current CTS-V weighs more and has less HP than the 2012 ZL1. I assume the new CTS-V will have the same upgraded LSA for 2012. So I expect teh ZL1 to run 11.5s

Bay Area SS 07-19-2011 11:58 AM

Low 12s

RLHMARINES 07-19-2011 12:00 PM

11.5 e.t. with 1 foot rollout like they do at the at the track.

radz28 07-19-2011 12:06 PM

I think the rags', minus the likes of GMHTP, Super Chevy, and CHP, will get 12.0s and someone like you would get 11.7-11.8. Lighter, more weight, but tires that I'm not as confident in as those PS2s...

ShnOmac 07-19-2011 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by radz28 (Post 3490860)
but tires that I'm not as confident in as those PS2s...

305's vs 285's though...... :drool:

RLHMARINES 07-19-2011 12:29 PM

I think that all we need to do is look at the numbers from SLP's ZL585 test by motorweek for an indication of what's in store for the ZL1 from chevy.

Scarrzz 07-19-2011 01:01 PM

.

Have you ever heard the phrase, "built for speed, not comfort" ?

What wheels was the CTS V using, and do we have any weight savings there? Any savings on the wheels will produce a more substantial difference than the pound for pound weight comparison between the vehicles.


I'm guessing the weight savings and wider rubber will correspond to a good tenth of a second improvement, so 11.85 - 11.9 would be my expectation.

Maybe even a touch better with everything designed to work together as a total package. I'm open to being astounded.


.

radz28 07-19-2011 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShnOmac (Post 3490896)
305's vs 285's though...... :drool:

True, true, true. I see myself moving into some 315s or 325s though :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by RLHMARINES (Post 3490996)
I think that all we need to do is look at the numbers from SLP's ZL585 test by motorweek for an indication of what's in store for the ZL1 from chevy.

:word: That's a good proxy, I think. Except for it maybe weighing a little less, and I'm not sure what the aerodynamic differences would make between the two in only 1320', but I think that's a fair comparison. That car probably makes a little more power and weighs a little less, but won't have the traction of ZL1.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scarrzz (Post 3491156)
.

Have you ever heard the phrase, "built for speed, not comfort" ?

What wheels was the CTS V using, and do we have any weight savings there? Any savings on the wheels will produce a more substantial difference than the pound for pound weight comparison between the vehicles.


I'm guessing the weight savings and wider rubber will correspond to a good tenth of a second improvement, so 11.85 - 11.9 would be my expectation.

Maybe even a touch better with everything designed to work together as a total package. I'm open to being astounded.


.

Does CTS-V have PTM?... That might help, too. Getting more power, too :D

blufin 07-19-2011 02:41 PM

I'm itching to find the answer to that question firsthand. Time seems to be standing still waiting for this thing. :mad0259:

nhra stocker 07-19-2011 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by radz28 (Post 3490860)
I think the rags', minus the likes of GMHTP, Super Chevy, and CHP, will get 12.0s and someone like you would get 11.7-11.8. Lighter, more weight, but tires that I'm not as confident in as those PS2s...

I was thinking the same as far as numbers with perfect conditions I think a low 11.8 high 11.7 could be possible. The mph is there for for that E.T. or better. Its going to come done to a great 60' to run it though.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.