radz28 |
07-19-2011 01:31 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShnOmac
(Post 3490896)
305's vs 285's though...... :drool:
|
True, true, true. I see myself moving into some 315s or 325s though :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RLHMARINES
(Post 3490996)
I think that all we need to do is look at the numbers from SLP's ZL585 test by motorweek for an indication of what's in store for the ZL1 from chevy.
|
:word: That's a good proxy, I think. Except for it maybe weighing a little less, and I'm not sure what the aerodynamic differences would make between the two in only 1320', but I think that's a fair comparison. That car probably makes a little more power and weighs a little less, but won't have the traction of ZL1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarrzz
(Post 3491156)
.
Have you ever heard the phrase, "built for speed, not comfort" ?
What wheels was the CTS V using, and do we have any weight savings there? Any savings on the wheels will produce a more substantial difference than the pound for pound weight comparison between the vehicles.
I'm guessing the weight savings and wider rubber will correspond to a good tenth of a second improvement, so 11.85 - 11.9 would be my expectation.
Maybe even a touch better with everything designed to work together as a total package. I'm open to being astounded.
.
|
Does CTS-V have PTM?... That might help, too. Getting more power, too :D
|