Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com - View Single Post

stovt001 · 07-26-2008, 11:08 PM

Even with less power the auto-equipped SS is supposedly quicker than the manual SS. GM's automatics are generally very good.

I'm not saying there's no point to driving manual. It certainly has its advantages. But I think the intro to this poll is definitely biased and misleading. The performance of the auto SS is not exactly limited, and there shouldn't be much difficulty modifying the L99, given that any modification to a modern engine needs to consider the computer anyway.

07-26-2008, 11:08 PM	#13
stovt001 Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: California Posts: 3,810	Even with less power the auto-equipped SS is supposedly quicker than the manual SS. GM's automatics are generally very good. I'm not saying there's no point to driving manual. It certainly has its advantages. But I think the intro to this poll is definitely biased and misleading. The performance of the auto SS is not exactly limited, and there shouldn't be much difficulty modifying the L99, given that any modification to a modern engine needs to consider the computer anyway. __________________ "It's kind of fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney There's a great big beautiful tomorrow shining at the end of every day There's a great big beautiful tomorrow Just a dream away