View Single Post
Old 10-14-2009, 05:43 AM   #49
chevy454
 
chevy454's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by chappy48 View Post
Wasn't saying it was a myth, just put it out there that a reputable car mag was saying it was a myth, and touting Ford engineers as the ones to say so. Maybe it's just something particular to the GT500...I don't know Just curious if anyone has actually done some serious testing on this ie. compared equivalent rear suspension setups for the quickest down the track.
The extra joints of the IRS system are gonna add resistance...I know from our older Corvette stuff that geometry is super critical an IRS setup. A minute amount of drag/friction doesn't sound like much in a daily driver setup, but I know in our race stuff we've picked up just by paying attention to brake/bearing drag, axle/housing runout, etc. I'm sure the drivetrain engineers @ the Big 3 could tell you in a second which setup is more efficient...and for my own curiosity, from a simple static weight standpoint, I wonder which setup would come out on top? Anyone have any poundage numbers on the 5th gen IRS setup vs. say a 4th gen solid axle, or even 12 bolt replacement?
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter
chevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote