View Single Post
Old 08-05-2008, 01:49 PM   #13
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emher View Post
an engine that has more power at low revs, say an LS3, would logically give at least a good a fuel economy as a turbo 4 that has to build up a bit to the power?
Given really tall gears, the big engine could get close.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmliptak View Post
More friction with more cylinders and the individual pistons and all the goodies they attach too are generally heavier and larger, so it takes more energy to move them, but I am not an engine expert.
Nor am I, but I do know that engine friction goes up as a square of RPM...making a high-revving smaller engine lose lots of its advantage when the big engine turns a really tall gear.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote