Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt TuneTime
Ted the unfortunate reality is this community is spell bound buy numbers and we have a good amount of vendors taking advantage of that .
The community as a whole needs to know whats real ... I applaud you for trying to help them but some will not listen ... One of the main reasons I not very active on this board
Owning a mustang dyno and tuning on it [super-flow is only 7% higher then my mustang unit ... we have SLP down the street and have ran cars back to back on them dyno jet in my parking lot a mobile 224x is 13.5% higher ]
Yes there are knobs on all of them [ even yours or the superflow's i have dealt with]
But at some point you have to ask your self as a consumer is this real or a sham wow
While I'm sure the car made 39X whp I highly doubt it gained 32whp ...
Food for though
Chuck mentioned they swapped tach leads and I believe that is why there base line is so low. Looks Like the tach lead dropped out or had an issue. There is no way that Kr would drop that much on the graph even at max 10-12 degrees [ Yes I have had g8's ask for dyno tunes then after 1/2 pull realize they had 87 octane in the tank ] . You will usually see a V in the graph or a couple of steps . But to me the baseline graph [ a lot of base line graphs look like that when vendors are comparing there products ] needs to be redone . I been doing this for almost 10yrs and have never ever seen a stock graph look that bad on any dyno that was working properly.
Rant over
Thanks
Matt
|
My Point Exactly, If you know you had a problem with the dyno or the car and the numbers just don't add up
Please Don't Post them!
The Reason I Use a Lazer Optical sensor for engine speed, you can't mess that up!
Ted.