Quote:
Originally Posted by greenrail
I guess that is true if you are stuck back in the '60s and '70s.
Which I am not. I grew up "back in the day." Saw the rise and fall of performance and the long recovery process when technology caught up.
I would consider many of today's performance cars equally as much a "Muscle Car" as any of those from way back then.
If you don't accept that, it is your choice. I just happen to not accept the premiss that today's cars aren't considered "Muscle Cars" because they aren't as tempermental or bare-bones as back then. 
What Muscle Car from way back then could equal the overall performance we have now?
I have been able to get all the horsepower I need, decent fuel economy (up to 25.6 verified MPG on the highway for some trips) and the safety we have built in now. 
Regardless of whether it is a Ford, Chevy, Pontiac, Dodge or Chrysler.
Honestly, I love 'em all. New or old. |
I was, of course, kidding. And ultimately, I don't care what label you put on them - this car is freakin' awesome.
How about "freakin' awesome?" Can freakin' awesome be a label?
