Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com - View Single Post

SLT223 · 11-03-2009, 06:54 PM

Back in the day (1969), the Z/28 was a lot of rev's, but not a lot of muscle. You got a solid cam 302 with 11:1 compression. It was a stout motor, but pretty small for the day. If you wanted more muscle, specifically a big block V8, you had to get the SS. The SS was king of the hill. They don't seem to care too much about how they badge their engine options these days. As long as they release this Camaro with one of the two superchaged 6.2liter motors, I really don't care what they call it. I'll buy it regardless.

11-03-2009, 06:54 PM	#27
SLT223 Drives: 1971 Chevelle SS Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: CT Posts: 13	Back in the day (1969), the Z/28 was a lot of rev's, but not a lot of muscle. You got a solid cam 302 with 11:1 compression. It was a stout motor, but pretty small for the day. If you wanted more muscle, specifically a big block V8, you had to get the SS. The SS was king of the hill. They don't seem to care too much about how they badge their engine options these days. As long as they release this Camaro with one of the two superchaged 6.2liter motors, I really don't care what they call it. I'll buy it regardless.