View Single Post
Old 12-20-2009, 01:39 PM   #58
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoleCat2SSRS2010 View Post
Ted,

Thank you for all that you have contributed. Please keep up the great work.

In regards to the use of meth (and I come from the old days, sorry for my misunderstanding of the new ways).

I understand the whole benefit in the chamber and timing advance effects.

My question is based the moleculer gravity of meth and water and uniform distribution.

Have there been problems with distribution uniformity with meth/water injection in either NA or FI (both being in the fuel injected environment. Seems like this could be diagnosed with a tear down of the engine and a comparison of the cumbustion chamers).

An answer to this would resolve a port injection version instead of a before the TB version design discussion (that is if uniformity is an issue)
None that I have seen and no more than Carburation.

We need the distance for time to absorb heat energy, the closer to the port the more chance of injesting liquid rather than gas.

The reason Fuel injection pressures are on the rise.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote