Quote:
Originally Posted by a_Username
That whole post just said you don't believe the 12.6 because you haven't seen it. Then I'm sure the Mustang didn't run a 13.2 stock, you didn't see it. The GT500 didn't run a 12.0 stock, you didn't see it. The list goes on and on...
|
I went out of my way to make clear that my problem with the 12.6 second run is a lack of evidence and credibility given the lone ranger nature of these runs. And I said exactly the same thing about the claimed 13.2 second Mustang GT's, I personally have not seen enough info and/or evidence for me to sign onto either set of times as being completely legit.
I buy into the 11.95 second GT500 run because the driver is well known, extremely credible, and they explained in great detail how the times were garnered and what they did and did not do. Somebody at the Fest may back up that 12.6 run and, given the right circumstances I'll buy it, but then again they may not. If you don't like my criteria you certainly don't have to agree with it, but I apply it universally.