View Single Post
Old 03-03-2010, 03:03 PM   #458
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N View Post
that's not entirely true. there are other variables that can/would even out the discrepency of the lack of torque (gear ratios). And as for fuel mileage, again, there are too many variables.


In general, an engine under higher load will run more efficiently. I do agree that there is a balance to be struck.
Sure, you can go with more aggressive gearing, but high sustained revs eventually kill engines, or at the very least wear them out prematurely. And gearing also has a negative impact on fuel economy. Practically all performance cars that make peak power at high rpm get poor fuel economy. Some of this is internal engine friction, some of it is gearing, some of it is simply not caring. But when a 2.2L I4 in a sub 3000 lb car gets nearly about the same fuel economy of a 6.2L Corvette, there is something seriously wrong.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline