View Single Post
Old 10-15-2008, 09:25 PM   #8
littlecammi
 
littlecammi's Avatar
 
Drives: '87 Pontiac Fiero GT
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 594
Some of our requests don't seem too complicated or unreasonable.

GM should be able to correct something in order entry to allow ordering the RS option package and then adding the polished 20s on top of that. This just really shouldn't be a big problem to overcome.

The two blue colors are available on the V6 but not the SS? GM either has to make them available on the SS or else just give us a reasonable explanation of why they can't. We'll accept it if there is a genuine reason behind it.

Some of us really want the HUD option on our Camaros. That's not GM's problem - that's our own. They said it would be available later on but not at the start of production. If it is that important, quit complaining and wait for it.

Some of us really want an SS badge in the center of the grille instead of the bowtie emblem. Leave GM out of that and wait for it from the aftermarket.

Some people want to order options individually instead of in package groups. If you want leather front seating surfaces, then buy the 2LT or 2SS trim package. Options have been bundled together in packages for years now. It makes planning for and purchasing the package components much easier for the car manufacturers.

And stop asking GM to add new things to the 2010 model year Camaro, like jetstream blue paint. It only diminishes our requests for them to paint the SS model in the 2 blue colors already scheduled for the Camaro V6s. We need to stop asking for every thing we think of and focus on a couple of our requests that should be the easiest for GM to accommodate.

Last edited by littlecammi; 10-16-2008 at 12:00 AM.
littlecammi is offline   Reply With Quote