11-12-2008, 05:10 PM
|
#96
|
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KatarHol
Oh,you test drove a GT,nevermind me,you're the expert  I was laughing at your "prioritize" performance statement,which Dodge has done the bare mininimal of with the Challenger. These Civics that the Mustang can beat,barely by your standards,must be pretty badass because the Mustang beats all Challengers at every trim level,so these "Civics" must have a field day with the porky Challenger. Dodge had 5 years to come up with a Mustang-beater and they couldn't even match the outgoing model,talk about "prioritized" performance......ohhhh,it's a nicer car,it has a nicer ride,go put on a dress. That's a wussy argument,ohhhh,a Accord is a nicer car than a SS,it rides better 
Keep this to real cars,like the Camaro and Mustang. I know you're not clear on what makes a real car,being the owner of a Impreza,but try to keep up.oops,i didn't mean to be cruel  I'll say it again,the Challenger is dead in 2 years,it's the new Mercury Marauder.
|
fanboy alert fanboy alert.....
definition=thinks his dream is a reality.
take a stock RT manny vs a gt manny....or auto vs auto RT wins...go research and check out the timeslips.
|
|
|