Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom
GM tries to cut too many corners. They love to completely abandon and ignore the V6 after market crowd. Just make the engine the only difference. Just like it was in the 4th gens. They are forcing me to either look elsewhere or consider a 1y used SS(will probably drop $8k in the first year).
|
the transmissions were slightly different in the 4th gens between v-6 and v-8 and 93-97 and 98-02
Quote:
Originally Posted by l008com
Here's a better question. Why would you buy an automatic sports car? I mean unless one of your arms and/or legs are crippled and/or missing?
|
because you dont give into that bullisht high school mentality that its not a real car if it isnt a manual. just like the "die-hard v-8" people saying they were going to get the v-8 no matter what the price, then the price came out and "oh, well I guess Ill get the v-6..... cus its still pretty badass"
does it matter in the end what someone else buys for their personal needs and preferences if it is different than you? no. and just so you know, a friend of mine is a parapelegic and drives stick. he runs 10s in his trans am. lol
heres the best question. why the hell do you care if someone wants to buy an auto over a manual? i mean, unless that would make you less of a man to not drive stick?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanys
Yeah good point, a LT/RS auto with no LSD would probably not be able to make agressive/abrupt maneuvers as fast.
|
that all depends on the driver's skill. i think i might start a tally of the number of Camaro related accidents after the car is released.