Quote:
Originally Posted by mondain
If it makes you feel better I'll say $43k MSRP, which is what I just priced the Camaro I want on chevy.com (not including tax+title+delivery/prep etc). Considering many dealers were at one point selling Camaros for $5000 over MSRP around here, someone spending $45k on a 2010 Camaro is not unheard of.
But I digress. My point on the interior is that nearly every professional review of the car stated its interior was cheap, plastic-y, etc. And that the cheaper Mustang had a much more refined interior.
I never said the Camaro interior was "not a muscle car interior" or that I wanted it to be plush like a Caddilac. I said that engineering today can produce a quality interior higher than that of the current Camaro for less money than before (as evident by the cheaper Mustang with arguably better interior, or the $40k 385hp Hyundai Genesis). Thus I stated that there's no reason to accept a less-quality interior these days when it's been proven for less $ we can have a better one.I'm not saying raise the price of the Camaro so it has a better interior; I'm saying we should be able to have a better interior without the price ever going up because other car companies can do it for less, why not Chevy.
Relax everyone  |
what you dont understand is that we asked GM to NOT water down the concept,
Simply buy touching the interior or looking at you cant call it cheap nor under par, try living with an older 325 (2005) i have, the DASH has wrinkels in it from UV RAYS i would called that ****ing cheap some of you need to live with a crapy interior as supposed to fuc*&* one and at auto show or dealership
