View Single Post
Old 06-19-2010, 01:16 PM   #53
LOWDOWN
Downright Upright
 
Drives: Daily
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milk 1027 View Post
I agree with part of this. I honestly don't think Trifecta has fully cracked the Bosch.

Like I said, I find it a bit hard to believe someone has fully cracked this ECU yet.

The car has been out for a year. But the engine and ECU have been out for a while and it has taken tuners this long to partially break the code.


As much as we would love to see more V6 mods, everyone is still trying to catch up with LS3 and L99 demands.

Let's be honest. The V8 camaro market is much larger than the V6 market.

I honestly don't see the reason for Tuners to break their back over this when there is much more to gain in the V8 market.

I'm sure they are working hard on this, but they need more time.
Milk, the simple fact is, the V6's lagging sales are EXACTLY the reason "support" is required. Camaro's "business case" was predicated on V6=60%, V8=40%. The numbers are reversed. And to properly readjust these, for CAFE and Supplier commitments, V6 rebates may be necessary...unless a credible, compelling case can be made for increasing V6 sales NOW. And how better than to have the V6 "enthusiast-friendly"?

V6 Mustang is about to eat the V6 Camaro's lunch...through "neglect"...

N/A, with a few "common" bolt-ons, it was "suggested" before Launch that 350+ Net Horsepower was "possible"...375+ with 91-octane...from "internal" GM sources...

HELP!

GTAHVIT: To clarify MY comments, they are in NO WAY intended as a put-down of Ken, or Graham, or Jason, or anyone associated with LPE. They are "friends" of ours. But this thread was "convenient"...ergo, what I posted, above...with ZERO reference to LPE...
LOWDOWN is offline   Reply With Quote