Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur
It doesn't matter who was there. It matters that the court ruled on the OEM tail lamps and no other tail lamps during the case. Inasmuch, the court made no decision on aftermarket tail lamps. The court ruled that OEM tail lamps for the G8 GT are not legal in the state of Maryland. I don't have to be there to read about the court decision.
Did your question imply that you have something constructive to add, or where you just needlessly stirring the pot?
|
But the guys
tail lamps were not
OEM. Seriously dude thats what he was trying to say. That guy had a tinted out set of tails that were posted, and the 'stock' set he supposedly replaced them with
weren't stock. He had cracked open the lamps, swapped out the lens, put in some LEDs, and painted part of the inside a different color than factory.
He did not get ticketed for a set of factory tail lamps. He had modified the set on his vehicle when ticketed. Once he changed one thing that DOT # don't mean crap and he's sol.
Lol the only evidence that MD ruled factory tails are illegal is from a post on the
internet by some dude who admitted he had modified his taillights, got caught in a lie, and then proceeded to delete all the evidence he could. What source of information is claiming the judge ruled factory g8gt tails illegal?
The dude who admitted to modifying his tails and is whining about being ticketed for it? Typing in bold is fun.