Quote:
Originally Posted by Stovall-SS
Hey I just noticed what whipple is claiming and wanted to share. Didnt know if anyone has checked this out or not.
http://www.whipplesuperchargers.com/...sp?ProdID=1243
Either way great build! Whipple has made some great products in the years. When I was growing up my dad had a twin whipple on his 28' Comander boat. It was pulling over 800HP, the boat was almost to fast.
Im still debating on weather I should go with Twin Turbos, or go ahead and throw down on a whipple.
I know this may be a stupid question, but for someone who dosent know "ME" If I had an LSX 427 would this whipple fit? |
I really don't like forum dyno racing, because it can be misleading. Whipple has a great product and we don't want to pass bad info. Whipple on their website claims 538 rwhp 510 rw torque on a dynojet. We used a superflo inertial loaded dyno, because frankly it has the most professional and best tuner in the area. We feel that our numbers (516 rwhp, 478 rwtq)once compensated for the superflo exceed whipple's claim. We were on the phone with whipple during the tune, there was a lot tuning we could have done to get more but decided to stop there. Namely, because I the customer, was happy there.
Realize that Tim, as a service to this forum is paying for the extra dyno time. I believe he may take it to a dynojet in the area just to prove the difference. For those of you unfamiliar with dynos, there can be a lot of variation. There is a compensation factor used for environmentals that if changed will skew results. As many members have stated it is not an absolute scale, it is more of a reference factor in determining increase from a starting point.