View Single Post
Old 01-08-2009, 08:22 PM   #100
UCF w00t
Geek
 
UCF w00t's Avatar
 
Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 4,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcAngel View Post
Yes but it should have had more so these comparisons would have been valid the V6 should have pulled at least a 5 sec 0-60
What should have had more what?

If you're going to only compare engines, do that as I've done. I've shown that the v6 in the Camaro is a BETTER v6 than the one in teh 370z based on engine performance.

Now if you want to talk about things like 0-60 times, you have to compare the whole car, including PRICE. The v6 Camaro cannot be compared to the 370z as it is a completely different car.

When GM was designing the v6 Camaro, their primary goal was not performance; it was price and fuel efficiency.

The 370z was designed with performance first, as was the Camaro SS.

You're trying to compare apples to watermelons.
UCF w00t is offline   Reply With Quote