Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010-1SS-IBM
No, that's it. I can tell by your string of excuses that you don't agree with it. Run your own comprehensive comparison if you wish, but don't lecture us on facts until you do.
The facts don't support you.
|
Right. So your basis for comparison of a '11 mustang and '11 camaro is a single lap race between two cars, one being a
2010 mustang, with roll cages, coilovers, a 100rwhp deficit and different drivers? Do you not think the mustang would have won with an extra 100rwhp, or even 50rwhp? They're not excuses if they make your argument irrelevant. If the IRS is always better than SRA then why was the mustang three tenths slower with over 100rwhp less?
Sorry, I just fail to see how that supports your position or how it's even relevant to reference this "comprehensive comparison" regarding stock 2011 mustang vs stock camaro ss. The mustang has a completely different drivetrain and the cars are far from stock.
If I'm not mistaken, pedders ran a privately owned 5.0 vs a privately owned ss and the 5.0 laid down the faster lap. I believe it was an L99, but if you want facts, that is a much more relevant comparison than two built track cars.
The weight is what will make the biggest difference.