View Single Post
Old 11-18-2010, 02:50 PM   #44
Total_Perf_Eng
 
Total_Perf_Eng's Avatar
 
Drives: Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 509
Send a message via AIM to Total_Perf_Eng
. This statement proves that you have absolutely nothing to provide on this topic, and have mearly resorted to childish tactics.
Being that I openly said I didnt even approve of KB's IAT's, shows, that unlike you, I only side with a company when it has merit, and factual data. I dont just attack in the hope of getting in the good graces of a company. But if you choose to continue, its fine by us. Fortunately, the Camaro guys tend to lean more on the technically inclined side.

Obviously, based on the previous statement from GMRULZ, Whipple has decided that THEY TO feel that having all of the proper data for their customers is the best way to go. Hats off to them, as it will help their customers immensly. It will also, without question, result in higher overall power; Because it will allow more timing to be run in their main table.

Regardless of what the IAT's are, ALL competent tuners can tune accordingly. So its really a mute point.
As a car enthusiest first, I am excited to see the results of their kit. Contrary to your belief, I think it is an EXCELLENT design, and has its place among the very best blowers on the market.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarricSS View Post
Everyone reading the thread for a Discussion on Whipple and Edelbrock...thanks for once again turning the thread into a:


For KB $$
Total_Perf_Eng is offline   Reply With Quote