Quote:
Originally Posted by StoutFiles
As opposed to no information by someone "official". It's time we just start preparing for the worst as these topics are now months old. We'll slowly push the negative information out of them and then GM will deny all wrongdoing for keeping it a secret and letting people stay with a higher level of car that only stayed there for ABL.
You think I'm annoyed? Try the people who don't come to this site, saw the Camaro online and the ABL picture that's still there, and ordered it based around that picture. You think they're going to be pleased? This website is a big "GM group hug" everyday, where we all try to ignore shortcomings and faults by the General and focus on the positives. GM doesn't need to please us, 90% of you would buy anything they slap the Chevy Camaro name on.
However, the people outside the group hug? They aren't going to put up with crap, especially any from a company that needed and still needs loans to survive. GM, you have to do ABL right...one failure anywhere on this and other cars and you WILL be pounced on.
|
It's not that bad here. You'll find that many guys do bring up the negatives within GM on a regular basis. I am one of those guys and I never get my posts deleted by the moderators. Many moderators have also openly expressed their concern about some things GM does. Read some of Tags posts regarding ambient lighting. This would not happen at CamaroZ28.com as the owners there have specifically stated that they will not tolerate any negative discussion about GM products or processes even if they are warranted.