View Single Post
Old 03-22-2011, 02:32 PM   #68
Blade


 
Blade's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS BVM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,689
Send a message via AIM to Blade
So everyone is looking to get a cheaper option in this thread right? I wanted to point out the fact that there will be no gains in the ECM. Which we all know about.

So if you are trying to create competitive pricing.......go for it. I won't critique that, but I really hope that you guys aren't expecting a breakthrough on the 3.6l engine thats all.

And the reason I hope that is because I respect almost everyone who has posted in this thread, and their efforts in modifying their cars.

BTW.....Diablo, SLP, HP Tuners etc never claimed before that there wasn't enough demand. Their claim was that they DIDN'T THINK v6 owners cared to mod when the Camaro was released, so they geared all their mods to the SS model. Then they also claimed that they didn't bother creating a tune for the v6, because they didn't see the point of advertising 0HP gain tune.

All I am saying is buyer beware if you are expecting something more in return. If you are expecting a cheaper solution than go for it, they are most likely going to hook you up with a TCM & A/F ratio tune for maybe $100 - $200 difference. Which I agree is a big deal in value and performance.

Again I am just posting in this thread out of respect and just looking out for you guys & girls. Not trying to be a debbie downer and look I didn't even use the T-word in this post
__________________
Formerly owner of:

2012 2SS/RS Build Thread - Totaled by red light runner

2010 LT/RS Build Thread - Traded in for 2012 2SS

2007 Acura TSX

1992 Oldsmobile Achieva V6

1992 Mercury Sable
Blade is offline   Reply With Quote