Thread: 100 Octane
View Single Post
Old 03-25-2011, 04:53 PM   #28
brantley847
v It bites.
 
brantley847's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 IBM 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff4946 View Post
That is funny, because everytime you bring up a v6 tune, every tuner out there will tell you with a straight face" there are no gains to be had... gm did an excellent job of getting everything out of this engine", and yet this just proves that wrong.


I have never heard anything about V6 tunes or their results, I never mentioned anything about tunes. I figured were speaking specifically in reference to STOCK V6 vehicles and their difference between higher grade comparision for 87 and 93. I assumed that was only way to make a fair comparision for the OP.

What I mentioned was, we don't know which vehicles have been tuned or which vehicles have been modified when other members continue to reference dyno results etc...
__________________
2011 2SS/RS
Performance: 439 RWHP: 226/236 Comp Cam, Kooks 1-7/8, CAInc, Borla S type, Vmax TB, Rx Catch Can, Trans cooler, SLP 160 termo, Melling high volume, Eibach Springs/Sways 1" drop, Whiteline complete bushing kit.
brantley847 is offline   Reply With Quote