View Single Post
Old 02-26-2009, 06:34 PM   #25
UCF w00t
Geek
 
UCF w00t's Avatar
 
Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 4,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodrunner View Post
To believe him about what??....that they're building V6's & V8's....like we didn't already know that. Or, that they want us "collectively" behind the wheels of our cars ASAP....just exactly what does that mean? Oh, but only additional dealer V6's are constrained. So, how many U.S. V6's have moved beyond 1100? NONE!

And then there's his definitive answer to the ABL....they won't do it if they can't do it right. Now there's some detailed info. for all of us to digest.

Sorry, I'm just a whole lot disappointed right now.
People jumped on me for sticking to the idea that LS/LT customer orders would be pushed (for the most part) behind the one-car-per-dealer cars but from all accounts, thats exactly what is happening; at least in the US. Surely not every first order in the country was a SS.

Fbodfather told us they would do ABL right or not at all and only on the doors is not "right" by most peoples' definitions. And he posted that in response to a question about it being on the doors only so one could surmise that he would agree with it not being "right" only on the doors.
UCF w00t is offline   Reply With Quote