View Single Post
Old 06-07-2011, 04:03 PM   #91
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Here's one from 2004 where Bill Ford proposed a tax increase.

http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f...tax-hike-4734/
Are we really going to compare proposed tax increases and vehicle rebate incentives from under $2/gal 7 years ago during the SUV mega-craze to proposed tax increases at $4/gal in a far less stable economy when fuel-efficient vehicles are selling well? I don't really see that as a valid comparison.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
The most logical explanation probably is that GM (and everyone else) is worried about the next CAFE increase. The more fuel-efficient cars an automaker sells, they less they have to worry about CAFE. For example, if GM sells a bunch of Volts, Cruze Ecos, Malibu Ecos, LaCrosse/Regal eAssist, etc, those can offset the lower fuel economy of vehicles like trucks/SUVs. It's also why you see BMW and Mercedes working their butts off to get A/B segment cars to market soon.

That being said, I highly doubt the next CAFE target will be 62 MPG. Every automaker is on the verge of rioting about that.
I understand that and if sales of compacts and efficient vehicles in general were suffering or gas prices were low I believe it would hold more water. However, fuel efficient vehicles are selling better than ever and gas prices are near as high as they have ever been
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote